Re: [VOTE] Approve the M1 release of Apache Stonehenge (Second try)

2009-05-23 Thread sebb
On 23/05/2009, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > > > >> > >> the source archive does not have the > >> > documentation source files. The generated site files are included > >> > instead. [The binary archive correctly contains the generate site > >> > files.] > >> > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Approve the M1 release of Apache Stonehenge (Second try)

2009-05-23 Thread Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
Hi Sebb, Thank you very much for the clarifications. Regards, Shankar On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 4:28 PM, sebb wrote: > On 23/05/2009, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar wrote: >> Hi Sebb, >> >> >> >>  >> >>  >>  the source archive does not have the >>  >>  > documentation source files. The generated sit

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Shindig Incubator 1.0

2009-05-23 Thread Leo Simons
On May 21, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Upayavira wrote: I am a mentor for Shindig, but I am aware of a weaknesses of mine as a mentor is that I'm not that knowledgeable or experienced with the release process at Apache, and therefore have not followed this thread in detail, which I really should have. It

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Shindig Incubator 1.0

2009-05-23 Thread Santiago Gala
El sáb, 23-05-2009 a las 21:02 +0200, Leo Simons escribió: > On May 21, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Upayavira wrote: > > I am a mentor for Shindig, but I am aware of a weaknesses of mine as a > > mentor is that I'm not that knowledgeable or experienced with the > > release process at Apache, and therefore ha