Would this be moved to the attic?
On Jul 27, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
What is the procedure for updating the Web site etc.? We need to let
outsiders know that they should not depend on this incubator
project. (There
are tons of really solid incubator projects that others
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Would this be moved to the attic?
Probably not. The Attic is the collection of all released Apache
Projects. Podlings != Projects, and were never accepted as projects.
Do we want to charge the Attic with such additional burdens of then
completing all IP clearances that
Agree with Bill. Attic isn't the place, and Incubator has plenty or
suspended/terminated/dead/inactive/whatever-the-politically-correct-term-is
and I see no point changing this.
-- Niclas
On Jul 28, 2009 4:41 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote: Would this
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
This thread really needs to be put to a conclusion as policy and procedure.
On the table we have:
Suspension would include:
-- disable the mailing lists (no need to moderate)
-- disable commit access (no need to review changes)
-- change the index of
Gang,
The feeling among the members of the Pivot podling is that it is ready
for graduation, incl the mentors.
We are aware of the lagging of STATUS page updates, and I will attend
to it shortly, but otherwise we think that the following issues are in
good order;
- No licensing issues.
-
