[RESULT][VOTE] Approve the release of PDFBox 0.8.0-incubating

2009-09-21 Thread Andreas Lehmkühler
Hi, Please vote to approve this release. This IPMC vote is open for the next 72 hours. The vote passes as follows: +1 Niall Pemberton +1 Jeremias Maerki +1 Jukka Zitting Thanks for all your support and reviews! I'll push the release out. BR Andreas Lehmkühler

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

2009-09-21 Thread sebb
Just noticed that the jar files in the zip/tar.gz archives are identical to each other, but are not identical to the jar files in the Maven repository - they have different hashes, for example: tgz/zip: empire-db-2.0.5-incubating.jar:103bed94cfba5efe0d2c3d4e90e4c89a Maven:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

2009-09-21 Thread Francis De Brabandere
This is a known issue, but they are built from the same tag. The only diff is the date in the manifest. Building the dist is done at a different time of building the maven artifacts and as the staging repo has no constant url we can not point to it from within our release script... I suppose

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)

2009-09-21 Thread Martijn Dashorst
This is an issue with how maven builds the artifacts... The timestamps in the MANIFEST.MF files are different, resulting in different hashes. Martijn On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 6:10 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Just noticed that the jar files in the zip/tar.gz archives are identical to each

[VOTE] Release cassandra 0.4.0 (final)

2009-09-21 Thread Eric Evans
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache Cassandra 0.4.0. We would now like to request the approval of the Incubator PMC for this release. Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed, structured key-value store. Podling vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Aries proposal for incubation

2009-09-21 Thread Jeremy Hughes
Hi Niclas, 2009/9/19 Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:  The real goal as it has been said an OSGi Enterprise Programming Model, and the comparison that has been made with Geronimo is not bad. U... No. The aim of

[VOTE RESULT] Release Pivot 1.3

2009-09-21 Thread Todd Volkert
All: The vote to release Pivot 1.3 passed with 4 +1 votes (all binding): Niclas Hedhman +1 Jukka Zitting +1 Martijn Dashorst +1 Kevan Miller +1 Thanks for the support and the reviews! I'll push the release out. Cheers, -T

Apache Aries contribution

2009-09-21 Thread adam wojtuniak
Hi I would like to be involved in Apache Aries project. Currently Iam working on OSGI based platform kernel application for Ericsson's OSS. As a Ericsson employee Iam also a full member of OSGI Alliance. I have quite good experience with OSGI and JEE so I think my help should be useful for that

Re: [VOTE] Accept Aries proposal for incubation

2009-09-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote: If it IS a goal to become a large component registry for anything OSGI enterprisey then my -1 vote will stand. Really it isn't. I mentioned earlier in this thread that Aries will seek to use components from other

Re: Apache Aries contribution

2009-09-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi Adam, that links might be of interest for you: http://www.apache.org/foundation/getinvolved.html http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html Best regards, Christian On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:11 PM, adam wojtuniak adamwojtun...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I would like to be involved in

Re: Apache Aries contribution

2009-09-21 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Rock on. Add yourself to the wiki proposal. Regards, Alan On Sep 21, 2009, at 2:11 PM, adam wojtuniak wrote: Hi I would like to be involved in Apache Aries project. Currently Iam working on OSGI based platform kernel application for Ericsson's OSS. As a Ericsson employee Iam also a full

Re: [VOTE] Accept Aries proposal for incubation

2009-09-21 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Sep 21, 2009, at 9:09 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote: If it IS a goal to become a large component registry for anything OSGI enterprisey then my -1 vote will stand. Really it isn't. I mentioned earlier in this thread