Hi sebb,
we have thoroughly investigated and discussed this issue and since everything
but the timestamp in the manifest is equal and there is no easy solution for
having only one Maven build, we (and our mentors) considered it a minor and not
blocking issue.
We're still relying on your vote
+1
Welcome Adam
Cheers,
Jeremy
2009/9/22 Alan D. Cabrera a...@toolazydogs.com:
Rock on. Add yourself to the wiki proposal.
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 21, 2009, at 2:11 PM, adam wojtuniak wrote:
Hi
I would like to be involved in Apache Aries project.
Currently Iam working on OSGI based
On 22/09/2009, Rainer Döbele doeb...@esteam.de wrote:
Hi sebb,
we have thoroughly investigated and discussed this issue and since
everything but the timestamp in the manifest is equal and there is no easy
solution for having only one Maven build, we (and our mentors) considered it
a
Hi,
I am a developer with specific interests in OSGi and JEE. I am currently
working on a common OSGi based platform for Ericsson. The Aries proposal
looks very interesting and I would like to contribute.
Regards,
Alan Keane
As we don't use the maven generated site for now I don't see it as a
problem. I used to publish the snapshot site over there. We might set
this up correctly in the future for reports like code coverage. On
the other hand we might as well be doing this using the apache hudson
instance...
I hope
On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org
wrote:
If it IS a goal to become a large component registry for anything
OSGI enterprisey then my -1 vote will stand.
Really it isn't. I mentioned earlier in this thread
Hi,
Results of the vote: 13 binding +1 votes, 2 binding -1 votes, 8
non-binding +1 votes.
Davanum Srinivas(*)+1
Craig L Russell(*) +1
Ant Elder(*) +1
Daniel Kulp+1
Matthias Wessendorf+1
Kevan Miller(*)+1
James Strachan(*)
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
If it IS a goal to become a large component registry for anything
OSGI enterprisey then my
Hi Alan...
Thanks a lot for you desire to contribute :). You should follow the
progress of Aries incubation on this list and Aries should have a site
which you can follow at this location http://incubator.apache.org/ .
There the dev mailing list and another useful info will be found. You
send a
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 10:15 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Jeremy Hughes hugh...@apache.org wrote:
If it IS a goal to become a
On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Upayavira wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 10:15 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
I'd be interested in what people thought they voted for. The list of
participants seems to have been constantly changing throughout the
vote, but we can only be voting on one proposal, so
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 21:40, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Upayavira wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 10:15 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
I'd be interested in what people thought they voted for. The list of
participants seems to have been constantly
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2242
I've already addressed those I could (i.e. confluence and svn)
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 22:03, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 21:40, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:47 PM,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:26 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
On 22/09/2009, Rainer Döbele doeb...@esteam.de wrote:
Hi sebb,
we have thoroughly investigated and discussed this issue and since
everything but the timestamp in the
14 matches
Mail list logo
