On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:26 PM, sebb wrote:
> Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
>
> On 22/09/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote:
> > Hi sebb,
> >
> > we have thoroughly investigated and discussed this issue and since
> everything but the timestamp in the manifest is equal and t
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2242
I've already addressed those I could (i.e. confluence and svn)
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 22:03, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 21:40, Kevan Miller wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2009-0
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 21:40, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 10:15 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd be interested in what people thought they voted for. The list of
>>> participants seems to have been constantly changing
On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Upayavira wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 10:15 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
I'd be interested in what people thought they voted for. The list of
participants seems to have been constantly changing throughout the
vote, but we can only be voting on one proposal, so wh
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 10:15 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> >>
> If it IS a goal to become a large component registr
Hi Alan...
Thanks a lot for you desire to contribute :). You should follow the
progress of Aries incubation on this list and Aries should have a site
which you can follow at this location http://incubator.apache.org/ .
There the dev mailing list and another useful info will be found. You
send a
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>>
If it IS a goal to become a large component registry for "anything
OSGI enterprisey" then my -1 vote will stand.
>>>
Hi,
Results of the vote: 13 binding +1 votes, 2 binding -1 votes, 8
non-binding +1 votes.
Davanum Srinivas(*)+1
Craig L Russell(*) +1
Ant Elder(*) +1
Daniel Kulp+1
Matthias Wessendorf+1
Kevan Miller(*)+1
James Strachan(*)
On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:09 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Jeremy Hughes
wrote:
If it IS a goal to become a large component registry for "anything
OSGI enterprisey" then my -1 vote will stand.
Really it isn't. I mentioned earlier in this thread that Aries will
s
As we don't use the maven generated site for now I don't see it as a
problem. I used to publish the snapshot site over there. We might set
this up correctly in the future for reports like code coverage. On
the other hand we might as well be doing this using the apache hudson
instance...
I hope thi
Hi,
I am a developer with specific interests in OSGi and JEE. I am currently
working on a common OSGi based platform for Ericsson. The Aries proposal
looks very interesting and I would like to contribute.
Regards,
Alan Keane
On 22/09/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote:
> Hi sebb,
>
> we have thoroughly investigated and discussed this issue and since
> everything but the timestamp in the manifest is equal and there is no easy
> solution for having only one Maven build, we (and our mentors) considered it
> a minor and not bl
+1
Welcome Adam
Cheers,
Jeremy
2009/9/22 Alan D. Cabrera :
> Rock on. Add yourself to the wiki proposal.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Sep 21, 2009, at 2:11 PM, adam wojtuniak wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I would like to be involved in Apache Aries project.
>> Currently Iam working on OSGI based platfor
Hi sebb,
we have thoroughly investigated and discussed this issue and since everything
but the timestamp in the manifest is equal and there is no easy solution for
having only one Maven build, we (and our mentors) considered it a minor and not
blocking issue.
We're still relying on your vote a
14 matches
Mail list logo