On 02/23/2010 04:57 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our
> champion to get moving :-), I'll assume lazy consensus and call a vote.
>
> I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be
> sponsored by the Incubator PMC for a new Va
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> Incubator PMC,
>
> On reading this month's report to the Board from the Incubator, the Board
> was concerned about the inactivity in WSRP4J. Has this project been
> abandoned, or is there some other explanation for the lack of any activity
>
+1 to accept Validation into the Incubator
afterwards we still can see where it actually ends up
however I for sure want to see this at Apache.
If you guys need a champion or mentor, count me in !!
-M
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> We're leaving the TLP/sub-project d
Noel J. Bergman asked:
> > Would there be interest in a project to develop Android-based apps?
> > I know that it sounds like an umbrella, and perhaps it would be until we
> > developed some critical mass, but it would provide us with a place to
> > collaborate.
And here's my follow up on the di
We're leaving the TLP/sub-project decision till graduation...
-Donald
On 2/23/10 5:36 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> As I understand it from the proposal, they intend to be Apache Commons
> Validation.
>
> On 24/02/2010, at 4:19 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:57:33 -0500
>> Donald
As I understand it from the proposal, they intend to be Apache Commons
Validation.
On 24/02/2010, at 4:19 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:57:33 -0500
> Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our
>> champion to get moving :-), I'll ass
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> [X] +1 to recommend UIMA's graduation
> [ ] 0 don't care
> [ ] -1 no, don't recommend yet, (because...)
a good job done by all :-)
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our
> champion to get moving :-), I'll assume lazy consensus and call a vote.
>
> I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be
> sponsored by the Incubator PMC for
On Feb 23, 2010, at 9:27 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
No objection under a changed name. I'd suggest adding an
adjective to indicate what is being validated.
Apache BeanValidation?
What's an Apache Bean? ;-)
Craig
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 22, 2010, at 6:24 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
Greetings,
As no issues have been raised in our previous post to discuss
graduation,
the Apache UIMA community requests that the IPMC vote on recommending
this resolution to the ASF Board.
All of our mentors have agreed
I'm open to suggestions BeanValidation, OpenValidation, Validera, ...
-Donald
On 2/23/10 12:27 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 02/23/2010 06:19 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:57:33 -0500
>> Donald Woods wrote:
>>
>>> Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push
On Feb 23, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:57:33 -0500
Donald Woods wrote:
Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our
champion to get moving :-), I'll assume lazy consensus and call a
vote.
I would like to present for a vote the following pr
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 23, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our
champion to get moving :-), I'll assume lazy consensus and call a
vote.
I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be
sponsored by the Incub
On 02/23/2010 06:19 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:57:33 -0500
> Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our
>> champion to get moving :-), I'll assume lazy consensus and call a vote.
>>
>> I would like to present for a vote the followin
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:57:33 -0500
Donald Woods wrote:
> Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our
> champion to get moving :-), I'll assume lazy consensus and call a vote.
>
> I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be
> sponsored by the Incubator PMC
+1
Go for it.
Craig
On Feb 23, 2010, at 7:57 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our
champion to get moving :-), I'll assume lazy consensus and call a
vote.
I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be
sponsored by the In
> [x] +1 to accept Validation into the Incubator
(non-binding)
> [] 0 don't care
> [] -1 object and reason why.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Donald Woods
>
>
> Proposal text from the wiki
>
> Validation
>
> Abstract
>
> The Validation project will deliver an implementation of the Bean
> Validati
Given the lack of response on the proposal and the push from our
champion to get moving :-), I'll assume lazy consensus and call a vote.
I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be
sponsored by the Incubator PMC for a new Validation podling. The goal
is to build a community ar
No problem. I've updated the Required Resources and Sponsoring Entity
sections and will start the vote on another thread. Thanks.
-Donald
On 2/23/10 10:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Thanks. I'll get with Kevan to update the proposal b
On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Thanks. I'll get with Kevan to update the proposal before we finally
> submit it for a vote.
Oops. Donald, we never synced up. My fault. Let's get this moving along.
IMO, we should structure the project as a normal incubator project, use
inc
On 2/22/10 12:26 PM, Greg Reddin wrote:
I thought I had the needed karma to update the site for the SIS
podling, but apparently I don't. I checked in the changes. Could
someone do the update for me (or tell me what I did wrong)?
Thanks,
Greg
looks like it is fixed up now.
Thanks Greg.
---
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 20:51, Doug Cutting wrote:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>>
>> The initial code was based on Apache Nutch so all the IP were cleared
>> there. The modification that have been done by myself are all done as
>> ASF committer. There have been code adopted from Henri Yandell patch
22 matches
Mail list logo
