On 24/08/2010 22:55, Upayavira wrote:
But people aren't going to be thinking about governing TLPs when making
assumptions about a name.
Does this project actually relate to Lucene or not? Apache Connectors
Framework tells me it is either a generic connectors framework for
connecting
+1 (Not binding)
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Dan Haywood dkhayw...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to formally propose a new project for the incubator, Apache Isis.
If accepted, Isis will combine the existing open source Naked Objects
framework with a collection of sister projects, providing
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
sanj...@opensource.lk wrote:
...It is of course fine to trim the list at the point of
graduation by looking at those who actually contributed during the
incubation phase vs. just adding their name as oh yes I'll contribute
I agree that
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Pid p...@pidster.com wrote:
On 24/08/2010 22:55, Upayavira wrote:
But people aren't going to be thinking about governing TLPs when making
assumptions about a name.
Does this project actually relate to Lucene or not? Apache Connectors
Framework tells me it
Sure would have been nice if these objections (other than David's) would have
been brought up last week before we went and changed everything (after waiting
several days for feedback) b/c we were working under the assumption that no one
thought it was a problem.
At any rate, we'll go discuss.
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 06:49 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Sure would have been nice if these objections (other than David's) would have
been brought up last week before we went and changed everything (after
waiting several days for feedback) b/c we were working under the assumption
that no
So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the IPMC? I
rather like the name, but (somewhat) understand the objections. That being
said, I'm not all that clever at naming, so...
On Aug 25, 2010, at 7:42 AM, Upayavira wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 06:49 -0400, Grant
