Re: Name change from "Lucene Connectors Framework" to "Apache Connectors Framework"

On Aug 26, 2010, at 12:09 PM, David Jencks wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2010, at 3:41 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > >> >> On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Upayavira wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:50 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for

RE: [PROPOSAL] Apache Isis

> I'm not actually putting this to a vote, yet I'm glad that you said that; votes would be marked as such. :-) --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail

Re: [VOTE] ALOIS to enter the incubator

+1 On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din < nour.moham...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 notbinding > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Benson Margulies > wrote: > > OK, I read the syntax of this sideways. > > > > +1, binding, from me. > > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Urs Lerch

Re: [VOTE] ALOIS to enter the incubator

+1 notbinding On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > OK, I read the syntax of this sideways. > > +1, binding, from me. > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Urs Lerch wrote: >> Hi >> >> There is, at least in my opinion, a very clear statement regarding the >> licencing: >> >>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Isis

Thanks for that, Siegfried. I'm not actually putting this to a vote, yet, because we still need to find more mentors and a champion. If haven't yet done any "cold calling" of possible would-be mentors, but if you have any suggestions of anyone who might have the bandwidth for either role, I'

Re: [VOTE] ALOIS to enter the incubator

OK, I read the syntax of this sideways. +1, binding, from me. On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Urs Lerch wrote: > Hi > > There is, at least in my opinion, a very clear statement regarding the > licencing: > >  = Source and Intellectual Property Submission Plan = > >  ALOIS is currently under a

Re: [VOTE] ALOIS to enter the incubator

Hi There is, at least in my opinion, a very clear statement regarding the licencing: = Source and Intellectual Property Submission Plan = ALOIS is currently under a GPL licence. Since there are only two contributors so far, both from the same company, there is no problem to re-licence th

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Isis

+1 (binding) On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > +1, binding. > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Siegfried Goeschl > wrote: >> Hi Dan, >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> Siegfried Goeschl >> >> On 24.08.10 19:12, Dan Haywood wrote: >>> >>> I'd like to formall

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Isis

+1, binding. On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi Dan, > > +1 (non-binding) > > Cheers, > > > Siegfried Goeschl > > On 24.08.10 19:12, Dan Haywood wrote: >> >> I'd like to formally propose a new project for the incubator, Apache >> Isis. If accepted, Isis will combine t

Re: [VOTE] ALOIS to enter the incubator

I don't see anything explicit in here about relicensing from GPL to ASL. Perhaps that was hashed out before I joined the PMC? I'm +0 tending toward -1 without an explicit statement that the copyright owners are known and on board with the license change. On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Urs Lerc

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Isis

Hi Dan, +1 (non-binding) Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl On 24.08.10 19:12, Dan Haywood wrote: I'd like to formally propose a new project for the incubator, Apache Isis. If accepted, Isis will combine the existing open source Naked Objects framework with a collection of sister projects, providing

[VOTE] ALOIS to enter the incubator

Hi, I would like to call a vote for accepting "ALOIS" for incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below and on the proposal wiki page (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AloisProposal). We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with Scott Deboy volunteering as Champion and

Re: Name change from "Lucene Connectors Framework" to "Apache Connectors Framework"

On Aug 26, 2010, at 3:41 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Upayavira wrote: > >> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:50 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >>> So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the >>> IPMC? I rather like the name, but (somewhat) understan

Re: Name change from "Lucene Connectors Framework" to "Apache Connectors Framework"

On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 06:41 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Upayavira wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:50 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > >> So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the > >> IPMC? I rather like the name, but (somewhat) unde

Re: Name change from "Lucene Connectors Framework" to "Apache Connectors Framework"

On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Upayavira wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 09:50 -0400, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> So, how does this get resolved? Shall I call a formal vote for the >> IPMC? I rather like the name, but (somewhat) understand the >> objections. That being said, I'm not all that clever a