Re: [DISCUSS] real-time communications

2010-11-25 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi folks, could you stop believing in a conspiracy taking place at the Apache Isis incubator project where a bunch of Isis member plus a few obscure mentors are trying to subvert the Apache Software Foundation by having a Skype session?! Get real - some of the concerns are justified and well

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accept Wave for incubation

2010-11-25 Thread Ian Boston
Yes, might even be able to persuade my employer to let me slice out some time, but even it I cant help actively, very interested. Ian On 24 Nov 2010, at 18:15, Dan Peterson wrote: > Ian, > > Cool -- I imagine this project could be rather useful for some of your > education projects. > > -Dan >

Re: [DISCUSS] real-time communications

2010-11-25 Thread Bernd Fondermann
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 22:34, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi folks, > > could you stop believing in a conspiracy taking place at the Apache Isis > incubator project where a bunch of Isis member plus a few obscure > mentors are trying to subvert the Apache Software Foundation by having a > Skype se

Re: [DISCUSS] real-time communications

2010-11-25 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > On 11/24/2010 3:58 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> >> But this is like if you are working in an office in front of a collegue : >> most of the time, you don't chit-chat, you work. And when it comes to make a >> decision impacting the whole p

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accept Wave for incubation

2010-11-25 Thread Andrus Adamchik
Sounds good :-) On Nov 24, 2010, at 8:09 PM, Dan Peterson wrote: > Hi Andrus, > > Thanks for your support. I think this'll be a good home for Wave to grow and > mature. > > I've taken the liberty of adding you on the mentor list. :) > > Cheers, > -Dan > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Andr

Re: [DISCUSS] real-time communications

2010-11-25 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
+1 @ Bertrand On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jeremy Carroll > wrote: >> On 11/24/2010 3:58 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >>> >>> But this is like if you are working in an office in front of a collegue : >>> most of the time, you do

Re: [DISCUSS] real-time communications

2010-11-25 Thread Andy Seaborne
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: On 11/24/2010 3:58 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: But this is like if you are working in an office in front of a collegue : most of the time, you don't chit-chat, you work. And

[VOTE][RESULT] Aries Graduation to TLP

2010-11-25 Thread Jeremy Hughes
72 hours have passed. The VOTE has passed with the following tallies: +1: 14 IPMC binding & 4 other non-binding Niclas Hedhman (binding) Daniel Haischt Guillaume Nodet (binding) Bertrand Delacretaz (binding) Jean-Baptiste Onofré Marcel Offermans (binding) Martijn Dashorst (binding) Mark Struberg

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accept Wave for incubation

2010-11-25 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Simple review: the original email was sent by Dan Peterson from his > google.com address. I imagine that if Google had a problem with it, > then he wouldn't be working there tomorrow :-D ... or if this was some > kind of spurious one-guy-goes-b

Re: [DISCUSS] real-time communications

2010-11-25 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Decisions are not made except on the mailing lists. Unless it is the Apache Board, which makes decisions in real-time and communicates back the result. Different standards for different folks. ;-) Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Dev

Re: [DISCUSS] real-time communications

2010-11-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Andy Seaborne wrote on Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:10:14 +: > In the past, I can remember stepping away from my desk for a few minutes > for coffee to come back to 10's of messages (bounced of a US server of > course) of Jena discussions between people a few feet apart. As long as "dozens of m