Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

2010-12-02 Thread Charles Goddard
+1 On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Dan Peterson wrote: Hi everyone, Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator. The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal (for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below) The earlier discussion thread c

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

2010-12-02 Thread Alex North
+1 On 2 December 2010 16:48, Soren Lassen wrote: > +1 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to wave-proto...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > wave-protocol

Re: [VOTE] Release PhotArk M3-incubating (RC1)

2010-12-02 Thread Luciano Resende
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > The PhotArk community has completed a vote on it's third milestone > release (PhotArk M3-Incubating) and  is now looking for IPMC approval > to publish the release. > > Please review and vote on approving the M3-incubating release > artifac

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accept Wave for incubation

2010-12-02 Thread Davide Carnovale
+1 2010/12/2 William A. Rowe Jr. > On 11/23/2010 8:11 PM, James Purser wrote: > > While Google owns the Google Wave trademark, they don't own the very > generic > > "Wave". > > > > Apache Wave will be a separate thing and unaffected by any trademark that > > Google owns. > > Wrong. The ASF is a

[VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.7-incubating (rc2)

2010-12-02 Thread Francis De Brabandere
Hi, The Apache Empire-db community has approved the 2.0.7-incubating release and we are now looking for approval of the IPMC to publish the release. *As we only have two mentors left we will need at least one extra vote.* These are the major changes from our previous 2.0.6-incubating release: *

Re: [PROPOSAL] Accept Wave for incubation

2010-12-02 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 11/23/2010 8:11 PM, James Purser wrote: > While Google owns the Google Wave trademark, they don't own the very generic > "Wave". > > Apache Wave will be a separate thing and unaffected by any trademark that > Google owns. Wrong. The ASF is always affected by other's Trademarks, which is why w

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

2010-12-02 Thread Ian Roughley
+1 On 11/30/2010 01:52 AM, Dan Peterson wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator. > > The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal > (for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below) > > The earlier discussio

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

2010-12-02 Thread Soren Lassen
+1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

2010-12-02 Thread Doug Cutting
+1 Doug On 11/29/2010 10:52 PM, Dan Peterson wrote: Hi everyone, Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator. The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal (for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below) The earlier discussion thread

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

2010-12-02 Thread Michael MacFadden
Phew, I wasn't sure which way you were going to go on this one... ~Michael On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Dan Peterson wrote: > +1 > > Realized I should vote as well! > > -Dan > > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Santiago Gala wrote: > >> I'm of course +1. >> >> Regards >> Santiago >> >> On

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

2010-12-02 Thread Dan Peterson
+1 Realized I should vote as well! -Dan On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Santiago Gala wrote: > I'm of course +1. > > Regards > Santiago > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Dan Peterson > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator. > > > >

Re: November 2010 Incubator Status Report

2010-12-02 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Thanks a lot Joe :) On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Apologies for the collective ball drop Mohammad.  Yes we > elected you to the IPMC, and yes someone should have sent > you an invitation letter to that effect long ago. > > In any case just write a note to priv...@incubator

Re: November 2010 Incubator Status Report

2010-12-02 Thread Joe Schaefer
Apologies for the collective ball drop Mohammad. Yes we elected you to the IPMC, and yes someone should have sent you an invitation letter to that effect long ago. In any case just write a note to priv...@incubator (along with a subscription request) saying you've accepted the nomination and I wi

Re: November 2010 Incubator Status Report

2010-12-02 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Hi all... First of all sorry for spreading this on both general@ and board@ cause I didn't know in advance to which ML I should send this e-mail. I was so excited when I saw my name nominated to be an IPMC member not the for the IPMC thing itself but for what it indicates that I have more trust

Re: Setting up the Jena podling

2010-12-02 Thread Leo Simons
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I'm a bit up to my eyes in OpenNLP. Can one of you get the initial > status page going? On it. - Leo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

Please add me on the IPMC

2010-12-02 Thread Vincent Siveton
Hi I am a member and a mentor of wave, so please add me on the IPMC Thanks, Vincent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

CCLA question from the new Jena podling

2010-12-02 Thread Benson Margulies
... Just a quick update on this: UoB finally got back to me and -- good news -- it's Ray Crispin (ex-labs, ex-appliance studio), which saves me some explanation. He was broadly positive, although they've raised one concern at [1] para 5: they don't generally provide representations, guarantees o

Re: I think individuals need SGAs

2010-12-02 Thread Benson Margulies
To my pleasant surprise, Sam replied on legal-discuss that an icla is just fine -- though it's better if the person signing it actually reads it first. I plan to make some more tweaks to the web site to places that seem to say the opposite. On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:

Re: Setting up the Jena podling

2010-12-02 Thread Benson Margulies
I'm a bit up to my eyes in OpenNLP. Can one of you get the initial status page going? On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Yay!! Thank you. I've been absolutely rammed with only phone access for the > vast majority of time. Thank you for  taking the job on (I really should have

Re: I think individuals need SGAs

2010-12-02 Thread Benson Margulies
I don't even know which mailing list gets commit notifies of infra web site edits. On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > Hi Benson, > > I didn't see your edit. I might not be subscribed to the right list (yet). > > You are right. A pre-existing code base is not covered by an I

Re: I think individuals need SGAs

2010-12-02 Thread Leo Simons
Hey hey, I definitely understand the reasoning. Hmm. I think the way to look at it is, "it depends, but do whatever is needed to allow apache liberal rights to sublicense all the IP to it's users". The second way to look at it is that logic and legal stuff are not always as closely connected a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

2010-12-02 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote: >> +1 >> >> Lahiru >> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Bertine van Hövell wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > edwardy...@ap

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

2010-12-02 Thread Edward J. Yoon
+1 On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Lahiru Gunathilake wrote: > +1 > > Lahiru > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Bertine van Hövell wrote: > >> +1 >> > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org http://blog.udanax.org ---

Re: Setting up the Jena podling

2010-12-02 Thread Ross Gardler
Yay!! Thank you. I've been absolutely rammed with only phone access for the vast majority of time. Thank you for taking the job on (I really should have said something). Ross Sent from my mobile device. On 2 Dec 2010, at 04:30, Dave wrote: > Ross, > > I hope I didn't jump the gun, but I'v

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

2010-12-02 Thread Lahiru Gunathilake
+1 Lahiru On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Bertine van Hövell wrote: > +1 >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Wave into the incubator

2010-12-02 Thread Bertine van Hövell
+1

wave

2010-12-02 Thread Thomas Wrobel
+1 ~~ Reviews of anything, by anyone; www.rateoholic.co.uk Please try out my new site and give feedback :)

+1 vote for the Wave Incubator Proposal

2010-12-02 Thread Tish Shute
+1 vote for the Wave Incubator Proposal -- Tish Shute Founder Ugotrade http://www.ugotrade.com @tishshute skype tish.shute +1 646 753 0539

Re: Accept Wave into the incubator

2010-12-02 Thread MiCHiLU/Takanao Endoh
+1 -- Takanao ENDOH http://www.MiCHiLU.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org