Re: OGNL Infrastructure questions

2011-04-28 Thread Christian Grobmeier
> we could share MLs and also SVN (Sandbox > would be nice, not?) MLs are fine, b/c one would need to change address later, and searching for pre-graduation threads is more easily. For SVN I don't see a benefit. The repos can be moved with less effort once component is graduated. I would like to

Re: OGNL Infrastructure questions

2011-04-28 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Henri! thanks for following up the conversation! I agree that joining the existing Commons infra would simplify the process to graduate OGNL as a proper Commons component, we could share MLs and also SVN (Sandbox would be nice, not?) What Incubator PMCs think about it? Simo http://people.apache

OGNL Infrastructure questions

2011-04-28 Thread Henri Yandell
Below is a thread from the Commons Dev list in which I'm recommending that OGNL use the commons dev mailing list and that the svn permissions allow the ognl committers and the commons committers to have read write access. http://commons.markmail.org/thread/ku3ouuilpiicb5is Is this a concern f

Re: [PROPOSAL] Airavata for the incubator

2011-04-28 Thread Milinda Pathirage
+1 for the proposal. I would like to contribute to this project. Thanks Milinda On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > I would like to propose Airavata for entry into the Apache Incubator. > > The full proposal can be found at [1] and is copied at the end of this > mail. For tho

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Bean Validation 0.3-incubating Released

2011-04-28 Thread Donald Woods
The Apache Bean Validation [1] community is proud to announce our 0.3-incubating release, which is our third release as an Apache Incubator project. This release includes a few minor bug fixes and passes the Bean Validation 1.0.3 TCK. Please visit the Downloads [2], Documentation [3] and Samples [4

Re: [PROPOSAL] Airavata for the incubator

2011-04-28 Thread Chathura Herath
Hi, I think this would be a good move going forward.In addition to points Glen and Srinath raised also Airavata has a significant stake in So going forWS-Messenger in terms of monitoring of long workflows across resource boundaries as well as the components being orchestrated. Going forward it wil

Re: [PROPOSAL] Airavata for the incubator

2011-04-28 Thread Deepal Jayasinghe
+1 for the proposal. Deepal On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > I would like to propose Airavata for entry into the Apache Incubator. > > The full proposal can be found at [1] and is copied at the end of this mail. > For those in a hurry here's a quick summary: > > Airavata is

Re: [PROPOSAL] Airavata for the incubator

2011-04-28 Thread Srinath Perera
Hi Glen, There is a slight difference between Savan and messenger as one let you subscribe to event generated by services whereas other is a broker. Still I agree that messenger is best placed inside Savan. I would like to propose that we bring in ws-messenger into Airavata and move it off before

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Deltacloud 0.3.0 (incubating)

2011-04-28 Thread David Lutterkort
I am pleased to announce the availability of Apache Deltacloud 0.3.0. Apache Deltacloud is a RESTful cloud abstraction API. The release consists both of the API server and a Ruby client. The release can be found at http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/deltacloud/0.3.0/ Gems and RPM's for Fedora w

Re: [PROPOSAL] Airavata for the incubator

2011-04-28 Thread Ross Gardler
On 28/04/2011 23:21, Glen Daniels wrote: Hi Ross, all, I think in general this looks great and I'd definitely +1 bringing Airavata to the Incubator. The only point I'd explore a bit is the WS-Messenger component, in particular whether this bit might (either now or eventually) want to end up in

Re: [PROPOSAL] Airavata for the incubator

2011-04-28 Thread Ross Gardler
On 28/04/2011 23:23, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: I'd be +1 to mentor and help see that outcome through. Please feel free to add yourself to the mentor list Chris. Great to have you on board. Ross Cheers, Chris Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2011, at 1:10 PM, "Ross Gardler" wrote:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Airavata for the incubator

2011-04-28 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
I'd be +1 to mentor and help see that outcome through. Cheers, Chris Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28, 2011, at 1:10 PM, "Ross Gardler" wrote: > On 23 Apr 2011, at 23:16, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" > wrote: > >> Hi Guys, >> >> Looks great and sounds very complimentary to OODT. Happy that you gu

Re: [PROPOSAL] Airavata for the incubator

2011-04-28 Thread Glen Daniels
Hi Ross, all, I think in general this looks great and I'd definitely +1 bringing Airavata to the Incubator. The only point I'd explore a bit is the WS-Messenger component, in particular whether this bit might (either now or eventually) want to end up in the Axis project, since it seems like

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release deltacloud 0.3.0 rc3

2011-04-28 Thread David Lutterkort
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 13:49 +0200, Michal Fojtik wrote: > On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:20 PM, David Lutterkort wrote: > > > The vote resulted in 8 +1, no 0's or -1's; two +1 votes were cast by > > mentors (Carl and Jim) > > > > With that, the release of Deltacloud 0.3.0 RC3 is approved and I'll move > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Airavata for the incubator

2011-04-28 Thread Suresh Marru
Hi Chris, Justin Erenkrantz previously (almost a year ago) pointed us to OODT and found it very complementary. Very Excited that Ross is involved with both projects and hoping for a good alignment. I tried the OODT 0.1 release but haven't looked at the 0.2 release yet. Briefly skimming though t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Airavata for the incubator

2011-04-28 Thread Ross Gardler
On 28 Apr 2011, at 20:45, Sagara Gunathunga wrote: > Hi Ross, > > +1 and I would like to contribute for this project. Excellent. We look forward to working with you. Ross > > Thanks ! > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: >> I would like to propose Airavata for entry

Re: [PROPOSAL] Airavata for the incubator

2011-04-28 Thread Ross Gardler
On 23 Apr 2011, at 23:16, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Looks great and sounds very complimentary to OODT. Happy that you guys > mention alignment -- might be nice to expose data from an OODT file > management+workflow management+resource management system as a Airavata >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Airavata for the incubator

2011-04-28 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
Hi Ross, +1 and I would like to contribute for this project. Thanks ! On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > I would like to propose Airavata for entry into the Apache Incubator. > > The full proposal can be found at [1] and is copied at the end of this mail. > For those in a h

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release deltacloud 0.3.0 rc3

2011-04-28 Thread Michal Fojtik
On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:20 PM, David Lutterkort wrote: > The vote resulted in 8 +1, no 0's or -1's; two +1 votes were cast by > mentors (Carl and Jim) > > With that, the release of Deltacloud 0.3.0 RC3 is approved and I'll move > the artifacts to the proper place to make them the GA. Excellent new

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-28 Thread Mark Struberg
hi just a sidenote: it's always a good idea to use the apache written versions of JSR APIs. You can find them in http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ LieGrue, strub --- On Thu, 4/28/11, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > From: Edward J. Yoon > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Hama ver

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-28 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Then, should I open new vote thread? On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your review. I am writing down all advices you gave me on > our project wiki. > > I'll fix that issue and make RC4 soon. > > Thanks. > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Stefan Seelman

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-28 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Hi, Thanks for your review. I am writing down all advices you gave me on our project wiki. I'll fix that issue and make RC4 soon. Thanks. On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > Hi Edward, > > first sorry for the late response. > > - checksums and signature are ok > - rat-che

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-28 Thread Stefan Seelmann
Hi Edward, first sorry for the late response. - checksums and signature are ok - rat-check looks ok (CHANGES.txt and conf/groomservers are not approved, you should add the apache-rat-plugin to your pom.xml) - Ant and Maven builds worked - license and notice file looks ok except for the servlet.ja