[RESULTS] [VOTE] Release NPanday-1.4.0-incubating

2011-05-16 Thread Adelita Padilla
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Adelita Padilla wrote: > > > Hi, > > The Apache NPanday community has approved the 1.4.0-incubating release > and we are now looking for the approval of the IPMC to publish the release. > > > These are the major changes included in this release: > >

Re: [Vote]: Libcloud to become a TLP

2011-05-16 Thread Upayavira
+1 On Mon, 16 May 2011 06:42 +0100, "Tomaz Muraus" wrote: > OK, sorry for the confusion, but apparently I need to open a separate > voting > thread so here it is. > > Here is also a list of people who have already voted +1 in the proposal > thread which can be found at > http://mail-archives.apa

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.2-incubating RC4

2011-05-16 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Hi, we need one more vote to release this. On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > here is also the link to the vote thread on Hama ML: > http://markmail.org/thread/qhs2s2f2fckemyje > +1 > Tommaso > > 2011/4/30 Eric Charles > >> +1 >> Eric >> >> >> On 29/04/2011 13:48, Edward J

Re: [Vote]: Libcloud to become a TLP

2011-05-16 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 (binding) Dan On Monday, May 16, 2011 1:42:25 AM Tomaz Muraus wrote: > OK, sorry for the confusion, but apparently I need to open a separate > voting thread so here it is. > > Here is also a list of people who have already voted +1 in the proposal > thread which can be found at > http://m

Re: [Vote]: Libcloud to become a TLP

2011-05-16 Thread Leif Hedstrom
+1 (non-binding). Well done! -- leif - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [Vote]: Libcloud to become a TLP

2011-05-16 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
+1 (binding) On May 16, 2011, at 1:42 AM, Tomaz Muraus wrote: > OK, sorry for the confusion, but apparently I need to open a separate voting > thread so here it is. > > Here is also a list of people who have already voted +1 in the proposal > thread which can be found at > http://mail-archives.

Board Reports Due -- and missing

2011-05-16 Thread Noel J. Bergman
I will be doing it tonight for Thursday's meeting. Missing: Bluesky, Celix, Delta Cloud, HCatalog, HISE, LibCloud (up for a TLP vote, but we still need a report), and SIS. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-uns

Re: Board Reports Due -- and missing

2011-05-16 Thread Alexander Broekhuis
Hello Noel, Celix is due in July according to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule Is the automated system supposed to email every month? Or does it follow the schedule and is there something wrong? On 16 May 2011 21:56, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > I will be doing it tonight for Thur

Re: Board Reports Due -- and missing

2011-05-16 Thread Tomaz Muraus
Sorry for the delay. I have just added a Libcloud report. Will also ping our mentors to check & sign it off. On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > I will be doing it tonight for Thursday's meeting. > > Missing: Bluesky, Celix, Delta Cloud, HCatalog, HISE, LibCloud (up for a

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating, RC2

2011-05-16 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On May 9, 2011, at 4:34 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > Hi - just to clarify, we did not include the HTTPD extension in the > release, but it remains available in source control for backwards > compatibility. Most people use the Active Directory Authority at the > moment. But thank you for compiling i

Re: Board Reports Due -- and missing

2011-05-16 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Noel, SIS should be on there...added it today. Thanks! Cheers, Chris On May 16, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > I will be doing it tonight for Thursday's meeting. > > Missing: Bluesky, Celix, Delta Cloud, HCatalog, HISE, LibCloud (up for a TLP > vote, but we still need a report)

Re: [VOTE] Release ManifoldCF 0.2-incubating, RC2

2011-05-16 Thread Tommaso Teofili
+1 Tommaso 2011/5/17 Grant Ingersoll > > On May 9, 2011, at 4:34 AM, Karl Wright wrote: > > > Hi - just to clarify, we did not include the HTTPD extension in the > > release, but it remains available in source control for backwards > > compatibility. Most people use the Active Directory Authori