Re: [PROPOSAL] Bigtop for the Apache Incubator

2011-06-13 Thread Nigel Daley
+1. Looking forward to the vote. On Jun 13, 2011, at 9:26 PM, Tom White wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose Bigtop to be an Apache Incubator project. > Bigtop is a project for the development of packaging and tests of the > Hadoop ecosystem. The goal is to do testing at various levels > (p

Re: *** Monthly reports missing ...

2011-06-13 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Wave is already in the making - seems it has just been forgotten to add to the wiki. I pinged them On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > I know that it is early (as in the earliest that the meeting could possibly > happen), but we're late.  BeanValidation, Bluesky, Isis, and W

*** Monthly reports missing ...

2011-06-13 Thread Noel J. Bergman
I know that it is early (as in the earliest that the meeting could possibly happen), but we're late. BeanValidation, Bluesky, Isis, and Wave are all missing from the Wiki. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-uns

[PROPOSAL] Bigtop for the Apache Incubator

2011-06-13 Thread Tom White
Hi, I would like to propose Bigtop to be an Apache Incubator project. Bigtop is a project for the development of packaging and tests of the Hadoop ecosystem. The goal is to do testing at various levels (packaging, platform, runtime, upgrade, etc...) developed by a community with a focus on the sys

Infrastructure and Data for... End-Users of OpenOffice.org

2011-06-13 Thread Christoph Noack
Hi Robert, thanks for your mail ... one may notice that my reply is a bit late, so I'm glad that I "disclaimer-ed" the available time in advance *g* So, if anybody is still interested in this topic, here we go ... Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 17:03 +0100 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin: > On Mon,

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Schaefer
Correct. 99% of the time the private list is used for voting in new committers/PPMC members. The dev list is the "all other business list" for the project. - Original Message > From: Simon Phipps > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Mon, June 13, 2011 5:41:27 PM > Subject: Re: O

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Simon Phipps
Presumably though the private list is an exception-handling venue and we should just get started on ooo-...@incubator.apache.org for now? Or am I missing key insights here? S.

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Simon Brouwer wrote: > Op 13-6-2011 22:14, Daniel Shahaf schreef: >> >> Sam Ruby wrote on Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:48:37 -0400: >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Greg Stein  wrote: On Jun 13, 2011 11:31 AM, "Joe Schaefer"  wrote: > > The pri

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Simon Brouwer
Op 13-6-2011 22:14, Daniel Shahaf schreef: Sam Ruby wrote on Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:48:37 -0400: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Greg Stein wrote: On Jun 13, 2011 11:31 AM, "Joe Schaefer" wrote: The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already submitted an ICLA and

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Sam Ruby wrote on Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:48:37 -0400: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Jun 13, 2011 11:31 AM, "Joe Schaefer" wrote: > >> > >> > >> The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already > >> submitted an ICLA and account request id to S

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Jun 13, 2011 11:31 AM, "Joe Schaefer" wrote: >> >> >> The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already >> submitted an ICLA and account request id to Sam. > > To clarify: some people already have IDs, such as myself. I

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Schaefer
Send a message to ooo-dev-subscr...@incubator.apache.org and reply to the automated response. That will subscribe you to the dev list, which is where the bulk of the conversations relating to Apache OpenOffice.org belong. If you wish to subscribe to the other lists, simply substitute the name for

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Raphael Bircher
Am 13.06.11 21:07, schrieb Andy Brown: Joe Schaefer wrote: Lists are now available: ooo-{dev,commits,issues,notifications,private}@incubator.apache.org The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already submitted an ICLA and account request id to Sam. Hi Joe, For us ne

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Andy Brown
Damjan Jovanovic wrote: On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Andy Brown wrote: Joe Schaefer wrote: Lists are now available: ooo-{dev,commits,issues,notifications,private}@incubator.apache.org The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already submitted an ICLA and account

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Andy Brown wrote: > Joe Schaefer wrote: >> >> Lists are now available: >> >> ooo-{dev,commits,issues,notifications,private}@incubator.apache.org >> >> >> The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already >> submitted an ICLA and account reques

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Andy Brown
Joe Schaefer wrote: Lists are now available: ooo-{dev,commits,issues,notifications,private}@incubator.apache.org The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already submitted an ICLA and account request id to Sam. Hi Joe, For us new to Apache, where/how do we subscribe?

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread JLCastle
I see this is too late to count but I offer my thoughts anyway. It was already late before it lurked in an outbox for a while. [-1] (non-binding) Vote to reject the OpenOffice.org PROPOSAL I reject the proposal not the community or the project. I am still a bit of an open source newb and d

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Greg Stein
On Jun 13, 2011 11:31 AM, "Joe Schaefer" wrote: > > Lists are now available: > > ooo-{dev,commits,issues,notifications,private}@incubator.apache.org Thanks, Joe! Subscribed. > > > The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already > submitted an ICLA and account request id t

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Schaefer
Lists are now available: ooo-{dev,commits,issues,notifications,private}@incubator.apache.org The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already submitted an ICLA and account request id to Sam. - Original Message > From: Danese Cooper > To: general@incubator.apach

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Danese Cooper
I'll be glad to moderate too. Danese On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > If I can get a few volunteer list moderators I'll go ahead > and create the mailing lists. > > > > - Original Message > > From: Sam Ruby > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Mon, June

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > If I can get a few volunteer list moderators I'll go ahead > and create the mailing lists. I'll be glad to moderate. - Sam Ruby - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr..

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Schaefer
If I can get a few volunteer list moderators I'll go ahead and create the mailing lists. - Original Message > From: Sam Ruby > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Mon, June 13, 2011 1:07:46 PM > Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org next steps > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Sam Ruby

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Andy Brown
Christian Grobmeier wrote: Joanmarie Diggs Peter Korn Jean Hollis Weber What is required to get these approved? http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#Voting+in+a+new+committer The Podling PMC need to vote these people in. If these people are already known to the current team, this sh

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Andy Brown wrote: >> Andrew Brown > > My name seems to be missing.  I forward a copy of the acceptance email. The email addresses didn't match. I'll send you a separate email (using the email address provided on the ICLA) on the process for requesting an id. - S

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Christian Grobmeier
>> Joanmarie Diggs >> Peter Korn >> Jean Hollis Weber > > What is required to get these approved? http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#Voting+in+a+new+committer The Podling PMC need to vote these people in. If these people are already known to the current team, this should be straightfor

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Andy Brown
Hi Sam, Sam Ruby wrote: I've divided up the list of proposed committers into four categories, based on their current status. --- Have IDs: damjan Damjan Jovanovic florentFlorent André grobmeier Christian Grobmeier gstein Greg Stein jimJim Jagielski lrosen Lawrence Rose

Re: [OpenOffice] Status page

2011-06-13 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > I just added the incubator status page. > > Due to the high number of committers, would it be ok to add the > committer names once the (iclas && accounts) are fine? > > Would like to avoid names in the list, who have thought to step up,

[OpenOffice] Status page

2011-06-13 Thread Christian Grobmeier
I just added the incubator status page. Due to the high number of committers, would it be ok to add the committer names once the (iclas && accounts) are fine? Would like to avoid names in the list, who have thought to step up, but then declined for some reason later. I am referring to the projec

Re: OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > --- Have IDs: > > damjan     Damjan Jovanovic > florent    Florent André > grobmeier  Christian Grobmeier > gstein     Greg Stein > jim        Jim Jagielski > lrosen     Lawrence Rosen > rdonkin    Robert Burrell Donkin > wave       David Fishe

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Manfred A. Reiter wrote: >> A (v)olunteer on the committer roster > > me too, if allowed Oversight on my part. One that has no bearing on the process. Next step for you is to send in an ICLA. http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt > M. - Sam Ruby ---

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Manfred A. Reiter
> A (v)olunteer on the committer roster me too, if allowed M. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

OpenOffice.org next steps

2011-06-13 Thread Sam Ruby
I've divided up the list of proposed committers into four categories, based on their current status. --- Have IDs: damjan Damjan Jovanovic florentFlorent André grobmeier Christian Grobmeier gstein Greg Stein jimJim Jagielski lrosen Lawrence Rosen rdonkinRobert Burrell

Re: [DISCUSS] how to add many committers to a new project (was: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation)

2011-06-13 Thread Joe Schaefer
If you read Roy's thread you'd have known that what you're suggesting was put forth by Noel, and Roy responded by basically saying that putting mentors in charge of a codebase they did not work on was a mistake: http://s.apache.org/3h4 - Original Message > From: Leo Simons > To: gener

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 6/13/2011 11:31 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Phillip Rhodes >> >> Mondo rad. But one quick question what does the (v) mean, listed after >> some of the names in the voter list? > > I meant to either explain that or remove it. Oh well. :-) > > That was my own p

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> > >> > Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members.  Quorum >> > is 3 binding +1 yes votes.  Once quorum is met,

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 6/13/2011 11:26 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> >>> Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members. Quorum >>> is 3 binding +1 yes votes. Once quorum is met, if more +1 vot

[DISCUSS] how to add many committers to a new project (was: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation)

2011-06-13 Thread Leo Simons
Hey hey, On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > +1 binding.  Given the sheer number of committers involved in this podling > there will be some work to do trying to gel a coherent development community > out of the group.  While I am optimistic, I am reminded of Roy's cautions > a

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Phillip Rhodes
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > > Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members. Quorum > > is 3 binding +1 yes votes. Once quorum is met, if more +1 votes are > > received than -1, the vote carries. Ot

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Congratulations to all who want this to happen! Now lets do our best to make it a success. For all the new committers: Welcome to the ASF. I wish a good time here with lots of fun. Cheers, Christian On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby wr

[VOTE][RESULT] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Sam Ruby
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members.  Quorum > is 3 binding +1 yes votes.  Once quorum is met, if more +1 votes are > received than -1, the vote carries.  Otherwise, the vote fails. Vote started on Friday, June 10th at

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Brett Porter
+1 (binding) I remain tentative as there are clearly some risks associated with the podling. I'm concerned about its potential to consume disproportionate foundation resources relative to other projects. I also think it'll face a an uphill battle fostering a community that can both work well wi

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Nick Kew
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:02:44 -0400 Sam Ruby wrote: -1 (non-binding) I've agonised long and hard about this. Wouldn't it be fantastic to see Apache take on such a great trophy project? And of course we'll be best-of-friends with TDF despite perhaps a few vocal individuals? And in the worst cas

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi, Sam Ruby wrote (10-06-11 18:02) Please cast your votes: a. - : because of the difficulties ahead, as mentioned on this list, for the OpenOffice.org product in the ASF (that may not be relevant for the AFS, but IMO are for OpenOffice.org), and since TDF for me is a more logical choice;

Re: [VOTE] Release Droids 0.1-incubating RC2

2011-06-13 Thread Thorsten Scherler
+1 (binding) sau2 On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 22:43 -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote: > Please vote on the release cndidate for Apache Droids Incubating, > version 0.1-incubating. I've received one binding IPMC +1 votes and 2 > non-binding +1 votes. > > PPMC release vote thread: > http://mail-archives.a

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Dieter Loeschky
+1 (non-binding) Regards, Dieter Am 10.06.11 18:02, schrieb Sam Ruby: *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE] As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apac

Re: Request: Can "proposed committers" introduce themselves?

2011-06-13 Thread Dieter Loeschky
Hi, I'm with the OpenOffice.org code base since the very first beginning. While still being an Oracle employee, my engagement here will be on an individual base. Here are some aspects of my OOo history in a nutshell: - started at Star Division as lead developer of the Impress application C++

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Tim Williams
-1 As a foundation, we are optimized to support delivery of open source code, it seems to me OOo and its user/community/the public would be best served by an organization built for the delivery of a finished end-user product. OOo would be such an anomaly for us I fear would lead to an embarrassin

ManifoldCF: Another mentor needed?

2011-06-13 Thread Karl Wright
Hi, The ManifoldCF project just lost Grant Ingersoll as a mentor, who resigned last Tuesday. ManifoldCF has been incubating since January 2010 and basically provides a framework and connectors for synchronizing content from a set of repositories to a set of target search engines, with security.

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Raphael Bircher
+1 (non-binding) Greetings Raphael Am 10.06.11 18:02, schrieb Sam Ruby: *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE] As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apac

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-13 Thread Steve Loughran
On 10/06/11 17:02, Sam Ruby wrote: *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE] As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apache Incubator project. At the end of this