On 10/06/11 17:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.
At the end of
+1 (non-binding)
Greetings Raphael
Am 10.06.11 18:02, schrieb Sam Ruby:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be
winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept
OpenOffice.org as an
Hi,
The ManifoldCF project just lost Grant Ingersoll as a mentor, who
resigned last Tuesday. ManifoldCF has been incubating since January
2010 and basically provides a framework and connectors for
synchronizing content from a set of repositories to a set of target
search engines, with security.
-1
As a foundation, we are optimized to support delivery of open source
code, it seems to me OOo and its user/community/the public would be
best served by an organization built for the delivery of a finished
end-user product. OOo would be such an anomaly for us I fear would
lead to an
Hi,
I'm with the OpenOffice.org code base since the very first beginning.
While still being an Oracle employee, my engagement here will be on an
individual base.
Here are some aspects of my OOo history in a nutshell:
- started at Star Division as lead developer of the Impress application
C++
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Dieter
Am 10.06.11 18:02, schrieb Sam Ruby:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be
winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept
OpenOffice.org as an
+1 (binding)
sau2
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 22:43 -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote:
Please vote on the release cndidate for Apache Droids Incubating,
version 0.1-incubating. I've received one binding IPMC +1 votes and 2
non-binding +1 votes.
PPMC release vote thread:
Hi,
Sam Ruby wrote (10-06-11 18:02)
Please cast your votes:
a. - : because of the difficulties ahead, as mentioned on this list, for
the OpenOffice.org product in the ASF (that may not be relevant for the
AFS, but IMO are for OpenOffice.org), and since TDF for me is a more
logical choice;
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:02:44 -0400
Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
-1 (non-binding)
I've agonised long and hard about this. Wouldn't it be fantastic
to see Apache take on such a great trophy project? And of course
we'll be best-of-friends with TDF despite perhaps a few vocal
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members. Quorum
is 3 binding +1 yes votes. Once quorum is met, if more +1 votes are
received than -1, the vote carries. Otherwise, the vote fails.
Vote started on
Congratulations to all who want this to happen! Now lets do our best
to make it a success.
For all the new committers: Welcome to the ASF. I wish a good time
here with lots of fun.
Cheers,
Christian
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members. Quorum
is 3 binding +1 yes votes. Once quorum is met, if more +1 votes are
Hey hey,
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
+1 binding. Given the sheer number of committers involved in this podling
there will be some work to do trying to gel a coherent development community
out of the group. While I am optimistic, I am reminded
On 6/13/2011 11:26 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members. Quorum
is 3 binding +1 yes votes.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Phillip Rhodes
motley.crue@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Binding votes are ones that are cast by Incubator PMC members.
On 6/13/2011 11:31 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Phillip Rhodes
Mondo rad. But one quick question what does the (v) mean, listed after
some of the names in the voter list?
I meant to either explain that or remove it. Oh well. :-)
That was my own personal
If you read Roy's thread you'd have known that what you're
suggesting was put forth by Noel, and Roy responded by basically
saying that putting mentors in charge of a codebase they
did not work on was a mistake:
http://s.apache.org/3h4
- Original Message
From: Leo Simons
I've divided up the list of proposed committers into four categories,
based on their current status.
--- Have IDs:
damjan Damjan Jovanovic
florentFlorent André
grobmeier Christian Grobmeier
gstein Greg Stein
jimJim Jagielski
lrosen Lawrence Rosen
rdonkinRobert
A (v)olunteer on the committer roster
me too, if allowed
M.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
A (v)olunteer on the committer roster
me too, if allowed
Oversight on my part. One that has no bearing on the process. Next
step for you is to send in an ICLA.
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
M.
-
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
--- Have IDs:
damjan Damjan Jovanovic
florent Florent André
grobmeier Christian Grobmeier
gstein Greg Stein
jim Jim Jagielski
lrosen Lawrence Rosen
rdonkin Robert Burrell Donkin
wave
I just added the incubator status page.
Due to the high number of committers, would it be ok to add the
committer names once the (iclas accounts) are fine?
Would like to avoid names in the list, who have thought to step up,
but then declined for some reason later.
I am referring to the project
Hi Sam,
Sam Ruby wrote:
I've divided up the list of proposed committers into four categories,
based on their current status.
--- Have IDs:
damjan Damjan Jovanovic
florentFlorent André
grobmeier Christian Grobmeier
gstein Greg Stein
jimJim Jagielski
lrosen Lawrence
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Andrew Brown
My name seems to be missing. I forward a copy of the acceptance email.
The email addresses didn't match. I'll send you a separate email
(using the email address provided on the ICLA) on the process for
Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Joanmarie Diggs
Peter Korn
Jean Hollis Weber
What is required to get these approved?
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#Voting+in+a+new+committer
The Podling PMC need to vote these people in.
If these people are already known to the current team, this
If I can get a few volunteer list moderators I'll go ahead
and create the mailing lists.
- Original Message
From: Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, June 13, 2011 1:07:46 PM
Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org next steps
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
If I can get a few volunteer list moderators I'll go ahead
and create the mailing lists.
I'll be glad to moderate.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe,
I'll be glad to moderate too.
Danese
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.comwrote:
If I can get a few volunteer list moderators I'll go ahead
and create the mailing lists.
- Original Message
From: Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
To:
Lists are now available:
ooo-{dev,commits,issues,notifications,private}@incubator.apache.org
The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already
submitted an ICLA and account request id to Sam.
- Original Message
From: Danese Cooper dan...@gmail.com
To:
On Jun 13, 2011 11:31 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Lists are now available:
ooo-{dev,commits,issues,notifications,private}@incubator.apache.org
Thanks, Joe! Subscribed.
The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already
submitted an ICLA and account
I see this is too late to count but I offer my thoughts anyway.
It was already late before it lurked in an outbox for a while.
[-1] (non-binding) Vote to reject the OpenOffice.org PROPOSAL
I reject the proposal not the community or the project.
I am still a bit of an open source newb and
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Lists are now available:
ooo-{dev,commits,issues,notifications,private}@incubator.apache.org
The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already
submitted an ICLA and
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Andy Browna...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Lists are now available:
ooo-{dev,commits,issues,notifications,private}@incubator.apache.org
The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already
Am 13.06.11 21:07, schrieb Andy Brown:
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Lists are now available:
ooo-{dev,commits,issues,notifications,private}@incubator.apache.org
The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already
submitted an ICLA and account request id to Sam.
Hi Joe,
For us
Send a message to ooo-dev-subscr...@incubator.apache.org and reply
to the automated response. That will subscribe you to the dev
list, which is where the bulk of the conversations relating to
Apache OpenOffice.org belong.
If you wish to subscribe to the other lists, simply substitute
the name
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 13, 2011 11:31 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already
submitted an ICLA and account request id to Sam.
To clarify: some people already
Sam Ruby wrote on Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:48:37 -0400:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 13, 2011 11:31 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
The private list should only be subscribed to by folks who have already
submitted an ICLA and
Op 13-6-2011 22:14, Daniel Shahaf schreef:
Sam Ruby wrote on Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:48:37 -0400:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 13, 2011 11:31 AM, Joe Schaeferjoe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
The private list should only be subscribed to by folks
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Simon Brouwer simon.o...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Op 13-6-2011 22:14, Daniel Shahaf schreef:
Sam Ruby wrote on Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 15:48:37 -0400:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 13, 2011 11:31 AM, Joe
Presumably though the private list is an exception-handling venue and we
should just get started on ooo-...@incubator.apache.org for now? Or am I
missing key insights here?
S.
Correct. 99% of the time the private list is
used for voting in new committers/PPMC members.
The dev list is the all other business list for
the project.
- Original Message
From: Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, June 13, 2011 5:41:27 PM
Hi Robert,
thanks for your mail ... one may notice that my reply is a bit late, so
I'm glad that I disclaimer-ed the available time in advance *g*
So, if anybody is still interested in this topic, here we go ...
Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 17:03 +0100 schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin:
On Mon,
Hi,
I would like to propose Bigtop to be an Apache Incubator project.
Bigtop is a project for the development of packaging and tests of the
Hadoop ecosystem. The goal is to do testing at various levels
(packaging, platform, runtime, upgrade, etc...) developed by a
community with a focus on the
I know that it is early (as in the earliest that the meeting could possibly
happen), but we're late. BeanValidation, Bluesky, Isis, and Wave are all
missing from the Wiki.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Wave is already in the making - seems it has just been forgotten to
add to the wiki. I pinged them
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
I know that it is early (as in the earliest that the meeting could possibly
happen), but we're late. BeanValidation,
45 matches
Mail list logo
