On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 13:51 -0500, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 6/28/2011 12:49 AM, berndf wrote:
Hi everyone,
this is a vote to retire the Bluesky podling.
3.5 years into incubation, the podling has not made progress in terms of
becoming an Apache project. Dev
Hi folks!
Just a dumb question: is Deft based on MINA?
And if not: would that make sense?
The thing is that I'm not sure if it would make sense to implement such a piece
solely on it's own when there are existing Apache TLPs which cover 70% of the
basics already.
If it technically makes sense
Hi Mark...
As they stated in Relationships with Other Apache Products that
they would consider such reuse of some of Apache Mina components. But
IMHO, this is not the a blocking issue to go forward with the proposal
as such technical detail can be changed while being in Incubator phase
if it
On 7/4/11 12:29 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi Mark...
As they stated in Relationships with Other Apache Products that
they would consider such reuse of some of Apache Mina components. But
IMHO, this is not the a blocking issue to go forward with the proposal
as such technical detail
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
If it technically makes sense the way it is, then I could volunteer as 3rd
mentor a bit - but I'm pretty busted with work atm, so I may not have enough
time to go all the way with you.
That's of course just fine,
Hi Mark,
This is absolutely not a dumb question. Deft is not based on Apache MINA.
Instead it's using raw Java NIO (without any level of
indirection/abstractions). The reason for this is basically to cut down the
overhead and to keep it as simple as possible, but still offer a flexible
api.
yup Niklas, please sign me up.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 7/4/11, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
From: Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Deft for incubation
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Monday, July 4, 2011, 11:28 AM
On Mon,
Thanks Mark!
To continue the discussion regarding if it make sense to implement such a
piece, like Deft, solely on it's own:
Things that justifies Deft's existence (In my very humble opinion):
* The simplicity
* The learning curve (e.g compared to Apache Mina)
* Small code base (manageable to
On 7/4/11 6:04 PM, Roger Schildmeijer wrote:
Thanks Mark!
To continue the discussion regarding if it make sense to implement such a
piece, like Deft, solely on it's own:
Things that justifies Deft's existence (In my very humble opinion):
* The simplicity
* The learning curve (e.g compared
On 7/4/11 4:36 PM, Roger Schildmeijer wrote:
Hi Mark,
This is absolutely not a dumb question. Deft is not based on Apache MINA.
Instead it's using raw Java NIO (without any level of
indirection/abstractions). The reason for this is basically to cut down the
overhead and to keep it as simple as
I have not looked at Deft a lot, but only from a 10.000 feet point ;)
It is just that such things like Filters, etc which are available for Mina
already used to be very helpful for lots of projects.
Do such things exist in Deft too?
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 7/4/11, Emmanuel Lecharny
On 4 jul 2011, at 18.31em, Mark Struberg wrote:
I have not looked at Deft a lot, but only from a 10.000 feet point ;)
It is just that such things like Filters, etc which are available for Mina
already used to be very helpful for lots of projects.
Do such things exist in Deft too?
There
On 7/4/11 6:38 PM, Roger Schildmeijer wrote:
On 4 jul 2011, at 18.31em, Mark Struberg wrote:
I have not looked at Deft a lot, but only from a 10.000 feet point ;)
It is just that such things like Filters, etc which are available for Mina
already used to be very helpful for lots of projects.
Yes, should be figured out while podling.
It is really just convenient if the same stuff (like Spring and CDI
integration) can get re-used without having to introduce a new mechanism.
But of course, there are eventually also cons with this approach ...
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 7/4/11,
Hi again,
Been examining the asyncweb project in more details (atleast the
asyncweb.client and asyncwebserver components). Below is my notes (simple
draft).
asyncweb notes
-client module
* https support for Deft's AHC (AsynchronousHttpClient) could borrow some
details from asyncweb
Please review this release candidate!
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
The Apache Hama community voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Hama 0.3-incubating (RC2). This release contains performance
improvements and new features
Hi, Everyone,
The 72 hour lazy consensus period has elapsed and the vote has passed.
By my tally, we have:
* 9 +1's from IPMC Members
* 9 +1's from other folks
* no -1 votes, and no 0 votes.
Binding votes (9):
Chris Mattmann
Nigel Daley
Alan D. Cabrera
Mohammad Nour El-Din
Chris Douglas
17 matches
Mail list logo
