Podlings needing copyright sign-off

Here's a list of the projects in the Incubator who need to sign off their copyright item; namely: "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the package, the core code, and any new code produced by the project

Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

Hi, Last time we checked activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar were covered by CDDL [1]. CDDL components can be bundled as binaries [2]. Florian [1] http://www.opensource.org/licenses/CDDL-1.0 [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Flo

Re: [PROPOSAL] Deft for incubation

It would be nice, very nice indeed, if this happened. It is not a MUST. :) Regards, Alan On Jul 7, 2011, at 4:42 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > Very good idea, such syncing among diff apache projects is highly > welcome and I can say it is a MUST. > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Juli

Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Ioannis Canellos wrote: > There is no conflict. I just told you that Geronimo provides its own specs, > which are definitely safe to use. I don't know how safe it is to use the > original ones, but I would trust Dan FWIW, Dan's saying that CDDL is ok comes from

Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:32:37 AM Karl Wright wrote: > OK - so now I'm getting conflicting advice. Somebody went through a > fair bit of effort to implement the geronimo versions of all these > packages, including saaj-impl. Are you saying that Sun/Oracle > recently changed the licensing term

Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

Thanks - that's sufficient as far as I am concerned. ;-) Karl On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Ioannis Canellos wrote: > There is no conflict. I just told you that Geronimo provides its own specs, > which are definitely safe to use. I don't know how safe it is to use the > original ones, but I wou

Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

There is no conflict. I just told you that Geronimo provides its own specs, which are definitely safe to use. I don't know how safe it is to use the original ones, but I would trust Dan. -- *Ioannis Canellos* * http://iocanel.blogspot.com Apache Karaf Committer & PMC

Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

OK - so now I'm getting conflicting advice. Somebody went through a fair bit of effort to implement the geronimo versions of all these packages, including saaj-impl. Are you saying that Sun/Oracle recently changed the licensing terms sufficiently that substituting the geronimo jars is no longer n

Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:23:21 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:08:52 AM Karl Wright wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache > > Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include > > activation-1.1.jar and saa

Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:08:52 AM Karl Wright wrote: > Hi all, > > The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache > Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include > activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be > from Sun, and are (I belie

Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

Geronimo provides artifacts for all java specs. You can have a look here: http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ -- *Ioannis Canellos* * http://iocanel.blogspot.com Apache Karaf Committer & PMC Apache ServiceMix Comm

Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

Yes, of course, I asked the contributor to post on your list. ;-) But it looks like that's not necessary now. Karl On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Florent Guillaume wrote: > Yes, you should Cc the chemistry list to tell us about it :) > Maybe legal@ also? > > Florent > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at

Re: Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

Yes, you should Cc the chemistry list to tell us about it :) Maybe legal@ also? Florent On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Karl Wright wrote: > Hi all, > > The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache > Chemistry.  The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include > activation-

Anybody know legality of saaj-impl-1.3.jar?

Hi all, The ManifoldCF has had a connector contributed that is based on Apache Chemistry. The dependencies of Apache Chemistry include activation-1.1.jar and saaj-impl-1.3.jar, both of which seem to be from Sun, and are (I believe) covered by the Sun/Oracle license. I was told a while back that

Re: [PROPOSAL] Deft for incubation

Very good idea, such syncing among diff apache projects is highly welcome and I can say it is a MUST. On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Julien Vermillard wrote: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Roger Schildmeijer > wrote: >> Hi again, >> >> Been examining the asyncweb project in more details (at

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire Bluesky Podling

Oh, my bad, didn't notice that part. In that case your suggestion to go to Google code is better and more appropriate. On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > It still exists: > http://apache-extras.org/ > > Please see: > http://community.apache.org/apache-extras/faq.html >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire Bluesky Podling

It still exists: http://apache-extras.org/ Please see: http://community.apache.org/apache-extras/faq.html "Apache Extras has been established for projects that don't want to, or are unable to be a formal part of the Apache Software Foundation but still wish to demonstrate their affinity to one or

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire Bluesky Podling

Can they upload it to Apache-Extras if it still exists ? On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> If bluesky project was rejected by ASF? >> would we continue to use SVN to upload our codes? > > Not the ASF SVN server. > > But you can use for example google code to host blue

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire Bluesky Podling

> If bluesky project was rejected by ASF? > would we continue to use SVN to upload our codes? Not the ASF SVN server. But you can use for example google code to host bluesky and upload to there svn servers: http://code.google.com/hosting/ > > 2011/7/6 Bernd Fondermann > >> Hi everyone, >> >>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire Bluesky Podling

hi, all, If bluesky project was rejected by ASF? would we continue to use SVN to upload our codes? 2011/7/6 Bernd Fondermann > Hi everyone, > > The vote to retire Bluesky succeeds with only +1 votes from > Martijn, Emmanuel, Bernd, Niklas, Tommaso, Bertrand, Chris, Ralph, > Christian, Noel, Luci