As can be seen elsewhere, I'm on a self-given mission to clean up the
history of podlings by getting them to sign off on the following
checklist item:
"Check and make sure that the papers that transfer rights to the ASF
been received. It is only necessary to transfer rights for the
package, the co
rfrovarp@ is going to take care of Droids.
I've pinged rgass@ and stroucki@ as recent Tashi committers to get it
sorted, and fitzner@ as the recent Etch committer.
Olio sounds like a subject of its own to discuss.
Hen
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Noting that vcl hav
Complete action items:
* Moved to retired table on Incubator project page.
* JIRA now read-only.
* SVN now read-only. To be deleted.
* Project page indicates retirement.
* Dropped from Incubator website RHS nav.
* Removed from reporting schedule.
To do:
* Make wiki read-only.
* Close mailing lis
This one is because the Libcloud project has not tidied
up after graduating from the Incubator.
See some tips at http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#h-Graduate
-David
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 02:00:07PM +, no-re...@apache.org wrote:
> Dear Libcloud Developers,
>
> This email was sent by
There are two kind of jar files. One which HCatalog is adding itself
and others we are
inheriting from Hive project. Since Hive is TLP and has multiple
releases I am going to assume
I need not to worry about any of those jars and sources. I have
verified all the HCatalog dependencies are ASL.
./li
Perfect. Thanks,
Craig
On Aug 1, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
% $svn info | grep URL
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/tools
% $svn di
Index: account-pmc.ezt
===
--- account-pmc.ezt (revis
> [ ] +1 Accept Giraph for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to Giraph incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject Giraph for incubation
>
> This vote will close 72 hours from now.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Avery
Voting is now closed. The vote passes with the following details:
+1 binding votes (4)
+1 non-binding vote
On Aug 1, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> Sendingasf-authorization-template
>> svn: Commit failed (details follow):
>> svn: access to
>> '/repos/infra/!svn/ver/793489/infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authorization-temp
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>>
>>> As the discussions on the ODF Toolkit threads seem to be winding down,
>>> I would like to initiate the vote to accept the ODF Toolkit as an
>>>
% $svn info | grep URL
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/tools
% $svn di
Index: account-pmc.ezt
===
--- account-pmc.ezt (revision 793364)
+++ account-pmc.ezt (working copy)
@@ -13,5 +13,10 @@
Please
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, Craig L Russell wrote:
On Aug 1, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
There are 30 PMC chairs on the Incubator PMC, which is more than enough
to sort its own authz needs without bugging infra every time.
It would be nice if this fact were better known, so
mentors-who-ar
Hi Daniel,
On Aug 1, 2011, at 10:52 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
There are 30 PMC chairs on the Incubator PMC, which is more than
enough
to sort its own authz needs without bugging infra every time.
It would be nice if this fact were better known, so mentors-who-are-
not-pmc-chairs would know
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Sendingasf-authorization-template
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: access to
'/repos/infra/!svn/ver/793489/infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authorization-template'
forbidden
If you could post the diff, then one of us
There are 30 PMC chairs on the Incubator PMC, which is more than enough
to sort its own authz needs without bugging infra every time.
Craig L Russell wrote on Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 10:44:55 -0700:
> This appears to be by design. The only folks who have rw access to
> the file are:
> [/infrastructur
This appears to be by design. The only folks who have rw access to the
file are:
[/infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization]
@pmc-chairs = rw
@svnadmins = rw
@board = rw
@secretary = rw
svn = r
# apsite needs access to asf-authorization-template
apsiteread = r
So at the moment, it appears
Same request that Alan : I'm part of the IPMC, and I don't have access
to this file.
Could someone grant me the needed karma ? Thanks !
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands
As an Incubator PMC member and an mentor for a fair number of podlings I think
I should have karma to this file. Is that possible? How do I get it?
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache
Sendingasf-authorization-template
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: access to
'/repos/infra/!svn/ver/793489/infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authorization-template'
forbidden
On Aug 1, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> You add the
Hi Alan,
You add them to this file:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/subversion/authorization/asf-authorization-template
Cheers,
Chris
On Aug 1, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> My podling's svn accounts have been created. How do I give them access to
> their
My podling's svn accounts have been created. How do I give them access to
their svn project?
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incub
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 15:16 +0100, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, drew wrote:
> > Wondering if it is still appropriate, acceptable, to add myself to the
> > list of initial Committers
>
> Alas not,
Not a problem.
> now the proposal has been accepted, that initial list is final
>
> The
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, drew wrote:
Wondering if it is still appropriate, acceptable, to add myself to the
list of initial Committers
Alas not, now the proposal has been accepted, that initial list is final
The good news is that as soon as the lists are set up, the podling would
be able to vote y
Hi,
Wondering if it is still appropriate, acceptable, to add myself to the
list of initial Committers at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODFToolkitProposal
Thanks much,
Drew Jensen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr
Dear ODFToolkit Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 August 2011, 10 am Pacific. The
report
for your
Dear Libcloud Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 August 2011, 10 am Pacific. The
report
for your p
On 1 August 2011 11:18, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
> the Serlvet Container is Red5 (which is a modified Tomcat Servlet
> Container), you cannot run OpenMeetings without it.
>
> For building the software, OpenMeetings implements some of the API
> Interfaces of the Red5-Server. So you need at leas
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 12:05 +0100, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> >> As the discussions on the ODF Toolkit threads seem to be winding down,
> >> I would like to initiate the vote to accept the ODF Toolkit as an
> >> A
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
As the discussions on the ODF Toolkit threads seem to be winding down,
I would like to initiate the vote to accept the ODF Toolkit as an
Apache Incubator project.
This vote will close 72 hours from now.
Vot
Hi Ross,
the Serlvet Container is Red5 (which is a modified Tomcat Servlet
Container), you cannot run OpenMeetings without it.
For building the software, OpenMeetings implements some of the API
Interfaces of the Red5-Server. So you need at least the red5.jar available
at build time in order to pr
Great to see this proposal coming back again. If I remember correctly
there was some concern about whether the application could reasonably
expect to be made to tun without (L)GPL dependencies.
It's clear that you've already done a fair amount of work to remove
these dependencies, but the main sti
+1 from me too
Mikhail Fursov gmail.com> writes:
>
> Used OpenMeetings yesterday for our local video web conference with 3
> sites online . It worked flawlessly.
>
> +1 from me!
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsub
31 matches
Mail list logo
