On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote:
The vote passes, with 4 binding +1 votes (plus an additional two IPMC
votes from the Whirr dev thread [1]), 1 non-binding +1 vote, no 0
votes, and no -1 votes.
The binding +1 votes:
Chris A. Mattmann
Mohammad Nour El-Din
Hi Nick...
I would like to help as well if you still need more mentors :).
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
HI Nick,
If you have been waiting for three volunteers before moving forward then I'll
raise my hand as well.
I'm looking forward to
On 05/08/2011 20:46, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Kalle Korhonen
kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com wrote:
Agree that the scope of Rat alone is limited. You mean if Rat proposed
to graduate as Apache Tools (or even Apache Infrastructure Tools)? Rat
could start as the
+1 for TLP and I could also help out with coding.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 8/9/11, Pid p...@pidster.com wrote:
From: Pid p...@pidster.com
Subject: Re: Apache Rat TLP...?
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, August 9, 2011, 9:52 AM
On 05/08/2011 20:46, Robert Burrell
Donkin
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Dave Fisher wrote:
If you have been waiting for three volunteers before moving forward then
I'll raise my hand as well.
Thanks for the offer. We did hit the required number of moderators last
week, we're now waiting on infra[1] to have the cycles to create the
lists. Once
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
I would like to help as well if you still need more mentors :).
If you've got the spare cycles, please feel free to give us a hand!
Currently we have our minimum of 3 mentors:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/odftoolkit.html
Nick
Congratz!
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote:
The vote passes, with 4 binding +1 votes (plus an additional two IPMC
votes from the Whirr dev thread [1]), 1 non-binding +1 vote, no 0
votes, and no -1 votes.
The binding +1 votes:
Chris A. Mattmann
Mohammad
+1 for TLD
My reason: No suitable TLP exists which is build system and
language agnostic.
And I think RAT is an attractive, little project. With time, it will
become very useful to others.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
Rat is
Devin noticed that we have our first status report due to the Apache
Board tomorrow (Wed). But we don't have an Apache mailing list to
discuss this yet.
So, I've pasted Devin's draft into the wiki. You can review it here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2011Search for
ODFToolkit.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
+1 for TLP and I could also help out with coding.
Great :-)
Hope to see you on the lists sometime soon...
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Ok.
I have patched the site and noticed the lazy consensus note.
But I'm puzzled here as tomcat folks ask an approval from incubator PMC [1].
Thanks,
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend : http://talend.com
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
[1]
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Ok.
I have patched the site and noticed the lazy consensus note.
But I'm puzzled here as tomcat folks ask an approval from incubator PMC [1].
Approval is needed but AIUI the IPMC uses lazy consensus [2] in this case
I see it
2011/8/9 Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Ok.
I have patched the site and noticed the lazy consensus note.
But I'm puzzled here as tomcat folks ask an approval from incubator PMC [1].
Approval is needed
Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com 写于 08/09/2011 06:47:05 PM:
Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com
08/09/2011 06:47 PM
Please respond to
general@incubator.apache.org
To
general@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept ODF Toolkit for Incubation
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011,
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 04:48:19AM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
You might want to use a different extension in the future (.sha512) to
reduce the confusion in particular since most Java projects only provide
sha1 hashes.
That makes sense to me, but it's contrary to the documentation on the
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote:
The vote passes, with 4 binding +1 votes (plus an additional two IPMC
votes from the Whirr dev thread [1]), 1 non-binding +1 vote, no
16 matches
Mail list logo