Re: October 2011 Incubator Board Report

2011-10-19 Thread Shane Curcuru
Joe is correct: 7-Nov is the Board F2F at an offsite location during the Monday of ApacheCon. The normal November meeting, where we'd expect monthly reports, is on the 16th as normal. The October meeting was indeed moved somewhat late, but I was hoping no-one else would mind having a couple

Re: October 2011 Incubator Board Report

2011-10-19 Thread Joe Schaefer
The board@ rescheduled the meeting at the beginning of this month.  The second round of nags had the date right; the first round didn't. Nov 7 is perhaps the board's face-to-face meeting in Vancouver.  I would expect the 16th to be the date for Nov PMC reports to be submitted, but just an educated

RE: October 2011 Incubator Board Report

2011-10-19 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> Keep in mind the board meeting isn't until > next week, so there's still time to address > the missingreports. <> We had the meeting date wrong, too. When did October move to the 4th week? And I have no idea when the November meeting will be, since there are two dates in there (7th and 16th).

Re: [VOTE] Release Droids 0.1-incubating RC4

2011-10-19 Thread Richard Frovarp
On 10/12/2011 10:08 AM, Richard Frovarp wrote: Please vote on the release candidate for Apache Droids Incubating, version 0.1-incubating. I've received two binding IPMC +1 votes and 4 non-binding +1 votes. The blockers identified by Marvin and sebb should be fixed in this release. I need one more

Re: [clutch.py] Split into data and presentation?

2011-10-19 Thread Shane Curcuru
Three cheers for sebb, David, and Christian - and others - for really making amazing improvements in the incubator website! - Shane - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-m

Re: [clutch.py] Split into data and presentation?

2011-10-19 Thread sebb
On 19 October 2011 01:18, David Crossley wrote: > sebb wrote: >> >> At present, clutch.py generates the output HTML directly. > > To clarify for others (i know that sebb knows): > It generates the whole xml into site-author, using some > fragments of html that are hard-coded in the clutch.py code.

Re: Website redirects for graduated projects

2011-10-19 Thread sebb
On 19 October 2011 09:40, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:55 AM, David Crossley wrote: >> sebb wrote: >>> The incubator site has an .htaccess file containing redirects for many >>> of the graduated podlings. >>> >>> However, not all graduated podlings are in the file; th

Re: Website redirects for graduated projects

2011-10-19 Thread sebb
On 19 October 2011 09:44, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin > wrote: > >>> Going by my experience running Clutch, it is mainly because >>> people do not completely follow the documentation that >>> has evolved for incubation. Not sure why. There

Re: October 2011 Incubator Board Report

2011-10-19 Thread Stuart Monteith
Hi, The Kato project reported in Secptember, as per our schedule. Our next report is due in December, not October. regards, Stuart On 18/10/11 18:05, Noel J. Bergman wrote: -8 ETCH, HAMA, HCATALOG (managed to do a release, though), KATO, MANIFOLDCF (also managed to do a release, tho

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] OSGi Service Diagnostics Contribution

2011-10-19 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Please review the following contribution for IP clearance: > >  http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-service-diagnostics.html Approval is by lazy consensus. If anyone has any comments, please jump in. Robert --

Re: Website redirects for graduated projects

2011-10-19 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >> Going by my experience running Clutch, it is mainly because >> people do not completely follow the documentation that >> has evolved for incubation. Not sure why. There is a lot >> of untidiness after graduation. > > +1 > > Is ther

Re: Website redirects for graduated projects

2011-10-19 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:55 AM, David Crossley wrote: > sebb wrote: >> The incubator site has an .htaccess file containing redirects for many >> of the graduated podlings. >> >> However, not all graduated podlings are in the file; the following are >> missing: > > [ snip ] > >> Should redirects

[IP CLEARANCE] OSGi Service Diagnostics Contribution

2011-10-19 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Please review the following contribution for IP clearance: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-service-diagnostics.html Thank you. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general

Re: Projects failing to repoirt for October - appropriate actions?

2011-10-19 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:05 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > On most months, I have to chase down missing reports. > RAT was discussing graduation, but still needs to report. Apologies. For podlings looking to graduate soon, monthly reporting is probably a good idea but I missed that Rat had move

Re: Projects failing to repoirt for October - appropriate actions?

2011-10-19 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:24 AM, wrote: > Can you please clarify what our responsibilities in fact are, as far as you > understand it?  If we are once again expected to report every month, we'd > appreciate receiving appropriate notification to that effect. The expectations are that you report

Re: Website redirects for graduated projects

2011-10-19 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:55 AM, David Crossley wrote: > sebb wrote: >> The incubator site has an .htaccess file containing redirects for many >> of the graduated podlings. >> >> However, not all graduated podlings are in the file; the following are >> missing: > ... >> Should redirects be added

RE: Projects failing to repoirt for October - appropriate actions?

2011-10-19 Thread karl.wright
Looking back over the email trail, it seems that there is some confusion as when certain projects need to report. ManifoldCF, for instance, was asked to report monthly for approximately the first year (or was it six months?). After that we received report notices every three months: March, Jun