On 10/30/2011 8:05 PM, David Crossley wrote:
Benson Margulies wrote:
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Thinking out load: perhaps just promote the project into a TLP, while
having a few IPMC members volunteer to become PMC members of the new TLP
and provide oversight?
Yup. No muss, no fuss, no new
+1
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
fyi - we already have one binding +1 (Benson) vote from our PMC vote
round so we need one more +1
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Thomas Fox thomas@seitenbau.net wrote:
+1
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Francis De Brabandere
franci...@gmail.com wrote:
fyi - we already have one binding +1 (Benson) vote from our PMC vote
round so we need one more +1
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Thomas Fox thomas@seitenbau.net wrote:
+1
Thomas
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:50 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 10/30/2011 8:05 PM, David Crossley wrote:
Benson Margulies wrote:
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Thinking out load: perhaps just promote the project into a TLP, while
having a few IPMC members volunteer to become PMC
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 08:25 -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote:
Don't worry about it. Your vote and my vote carry over from the dev list.
We're in need of a third binding vote from the IPMC.
Please, somebody, we are waiting for this release and suffering in the
community because devs hold back they
I currently look at it. Everything looks good so far, but when running
mvn test I get an error:
[INFO] Checking for local modifications: skipped.
[INFO] Updating project files from SCM: skipped.
[INFO] Executing: /bin/sh -c cd
/Users/cg/release-checking/droids-0.1.0-incubating svn
Thorsten Scherler wrote on Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 14:09:17 +0100:
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 08:25 -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote:
Don't worry about it. Your vote and my vote carry over from the dev list.
We're in need of a third binding vote from the IPMC.
Please, somebody, we are waiting for this
Turns out, there's a bug in th version buildnumber-maven-plugin that we
use that is causing it to fail.
We mark the jar manifests with svn versions, and that is what is
failing. Commenting the plugin out, or changing it to version 1.0 works
just fine.
Other projects are using that same
Given it is an incubator release and some stuff is not perfect yet,
I'll give my +1 even when this is not really nice. From the formal
point of view this all is ok to me. And as long as the source code is
there (and people have a chance to test it with your workaround).
Please cancel this vote on
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Richard Frovarp rfrov...@apache.org wrote:
Please vote on the release candidate for Apache Droids Incubating, version
0.1-incubating. I've received two binding IPMC +1 votes and 4 non-binding +1
votes. The blockers identified by Marvin and sebb
I don't think it's a blocker. We've got all of the other pieces correct
(headers, license, no category X libraries, etc). Having something
published into the repository will help us greatly. Plus it is already
fixed in svn, and hopefully we'll have a quicker turn around for the
next release.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Rainer Döbele doeb...@esteam.de wrote:
...Certainly there is no way for us to compete with projects like Subversion
or Open Office and there is no way for us to ever get
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Rainer Döbele doeb...@esteam.de wrote:
...Certainly there is no way for us to compete
Perhaps I'm biased here (and I'm also an ASF newbie), but, coming from many
one-band-man projects I feel 5 diverse, active and regular committers
that can keep their user base happy is more than enough to be described as
a succesful project. Just my 2 cents.
Regards,
Raffaele
On Mon, Oct 31,
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi
raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps I'm biased here (and I'm also an ASF newbie), but, coming from many
one-band-man projects I feel 5 diverse, active and regular committers
that can keep their user base happy is more than enough to be
Some d00d, not all. Not every healthy Apache project
needs to be a massive java experiment in social engineering.
Diversity is a good thing.
From: Robert Burrell Donkin robertburrelldon...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 31,
Robert Burrell Donkin said:
[...] Self-organising communities are only sustainable with a big
enough population.
I would also add that enough is a relative measure. Maybe (just maybe)
for empiredb enough is 5.
Ciao,
R
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Joe Schaefer
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Raffaele P. Guidi
raffaele.p.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin said:
[...] Self-organising communities are only sustainable with a big
enough population.
I would also add that enough is a relative measure. Maybe (just maybe)
for empiredb enough is 5.
David Crossley wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
The Incubator ReportingSchedule needs better management.
At the moment it is manually maintained.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
Podlings are expected to manage their entry.
Add to it when they enter the Incubator,
20 matches
Mail list logo
