+1
Signatures and checksums look good. I could successfully build from
source. RAT ran cleanly.
Cheers,
Tom
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Brock Noland wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version
> 0.5.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issue
On 2011-11-23, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is
> available and ready for your testing and voting.
This release has one IPMC +1 so far (mine) and needs at least two more.
Stefan
---
All,
I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is available and
ready for your testing and voting.
Release candidate artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/
SVN tag revision:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tag
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:28:06PM +0100, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
> > ...2) We redefine the term Champion to be a sort of meta-mentor who,
> > somehow, watches out for bears or missing mentors without necessarily
> > getting deeply i
Thanks Bertrand.
I guess my whole point is that I think what you guys are discussing
as Champion is what I've always felt it was.
Anyhoo, take care and Happy Holidays (at least out here in the States!) :-)
Cheers,
Chris
On Nov 22, 2011, at 3:36 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>> ...But as you say that role evaporates once the project starts, so it
>> seems to make sense to give more meaning to it, considering that that
>> fills some existing gaps.
On Nov 22, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> [..snip..]
> But as you say that role evaporates once the project starts, so it
> seems to make sense to give more meaning to it, considering that that
> fills some existing gaps.
That hasn't been my experience at all. I've been a Champion
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> 3. The Champion is not necessarily a mentor.
>
> Not sure if that actually makes sense. I think a Champion is a mentor
> by default somehow...
Not if a podling PPMC me
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> ...2) We redefine the term Champion to be a sort of meta-mentor who,
> somehow, watches out for bears or missing mentors without necessarily
> getting deeply involved...
That's exactly what I'm suggesting.
>
> ...As far as I'm concerned
The last time I was in this neighborhood, I was told (by no less than
our esteemed chairman) that the Champion's role was purely to play
Virgil on a podling's initial tour of the Foundation and the
Incubator. Once the podling was accepted, the Champion evaporated.
If I add Bertrand and Christian's
+1 on everything, just a few comments...
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> 3. The Champion is not necessarily a mentor.
Not sure if that actually makes sense. I think a Champion is a mentor
by default somehow
> 4. The podling can elect a new Champion at any time
I
Hi Incubator PMC,
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> ...Should we appoint one of the mentors at the start to be the "chair" of the
> PPMC, in the same
> way as a full project? I would see them as responsible for ensuring the
> podling is reporting, and
> that all of the ment
On 22 November 2011 18:08, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> The following point was recently made on another list:
>> You were given a commit bit on the expectation that you'll use it
>> reasonably and with common sense.
>
> Does Incubator communicate to initial podling commiters the above, and
> other expe
I feel very lucky that my podlings have gotten this sort of thing
right pretty much without me. I've been thinking that I should, in
future, grab their attention and remind them of some things early and
often.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> The following point was recentl
I went over the whole thread and I like idea, but I have one concern, what
if the non of the mentors agreed to be the initial chair of the podling,
Does this stop the podling from being accepted ?
Does this mean that all mentors are not allowed to be accepted as mentors ?
Or
Champion needs to find
The following point was recently made on another list:
> You were given a commit bit on the expectation that you'll use it
> reasonably and with common sense.
Does Incubator communicate to initial podling commiters the above, and
other expectations from commiters? Does anyone point initial commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Description: The Rat podling brought together aRat and
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>>
>> soft time limits (sign off copyright within 3
>> months or expect IPMC scrutiny) would probably be useful, I think.
>
> +1
I think we might be in a position now to document a
On 22 November 2011 14:08, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> To me a lot of the problem stems from the fact that the reports are
>> misdirected- instead of informing the board about the activities of
>> the IPMC, it tells them about the podling's
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
>
> soft time limits (sign off copyright within 3
> months or expect IPMC scrutiny) would probably be useful, I think.
+1
> Robert
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
I've setup a JIRA project [1] and worked through[2] an outline
process[3] for "rat". I plan to head over to the trademarks team and
get feedback + interpretation sometime soon.
So now would be a good opportunity to jump in with improvements
(documentation and process) and objections.
Please feel
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> But I think you mentioned something important, the fuzzy benchmarks. There
> are some we can make more critical, like: sign copyright stuff within
> 3 months or leave. Something like that.
Legal stuff isn't always clear cut (Sam's f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin updated PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1:
--
Evidence Of Use On World Wide Web:
Searched for "rat"
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> To me a lot of the problem stems from the fact that the reports are
> misdirected- instead of informing the board about the activities of
> the IPMC, it tells them about the podling's activities, which doesn't
> scale properly.
>
> We should b
I am +1 to Joe's formulation of short-term action items. I'd like to
graduate one or two of my personal ducklings before I sign up to start
acting as a wandering nuncio to others.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> On 22 November 2011 10:20, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>> On T
The vote has now closed. We had already received 1 IPMC +1 vote (plus an
additional 3 PPMC +1 votes) during the release voting on wookie-dev.
We now have 2 additional IPMC votes (3 in total).
Results:
IPMC Members/Mentors:
+1 [3]
0 [0]
-1 [0]
PPMC Members:
+1 [3]
0 [0]
-1 [0]
The vote is
It's time to call the vote on the "community graduation vote" for ACE. The
results:
+1: Bertrand Delacretaz (***), Karl Pauls (***), Carsten Ziegeler (***), Felix
Meschberger (**), Toni Menzel, Brian Topping, Clement Escoffier (**), Angelo
van der Sijpt, , Alexander Broekhuis, David
Bosschaert
On 22 November 2011 10:20, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>>... We should be reporting to the board about OUR work, not the work of
>>> the podlings. Podlings should only be brought in for a
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>>... We should be reporting to the board about OUR work, not the work of
>>> the podlings. Podlings should only be brought in
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>>... We should be reporting to the board about OUR work, not the work of
>>> the podlings. Podlings should only be brought in
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>... We should be reporting to the board about OUR work, not the work of
>> the podlings. Podlings should only be brought in for a few specific
>> examplesto mention. That's the first thing
+1 (binding)
Hadrian
On 11/17/2011 05:42 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
In my opinion, ACE is ready to begin the process of graduating from the Apache
Incubator to a Top Level Project.
Since joining the incubator in in May 2009 we've added 4 new committers (12 in
total now) from diverse organiza
Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity.
On Nov 22, 2011 1:40 AM, "Shane Curcuru" wrote:
>
>
...
> +1 to what Joe is saying below. The Incubator needs to do a far better
job both supporting it's projects (better mentors, better IPMC oversight),
as well as managing itself (
33 matches
Mail list logo
