[VOTE] Apache ACE as a TLP

2011-12-17 Thread Marcel Offermans
Hello all, As the discussion about the resolution [1] offered no further feedback, it is time for the Apache ACE community to request that the IPMC vote on recommending this resolution [2] to the ASF board. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1 to recommend ACE's graduation [ ] 0 don't care [ ] -1

Re: [VOTE] Apache ACE as a TLP

2011-12-17 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote: As the discussion about the resolution [1] offered no further feedback, it is time for the Apache ACE community to request that the IPMC vote on recommending this resolution [2] to the ASF board. Please

Re: [VOTE] Apache ACE as a TLP

2011-12-17 Thread Mark Struberg
+1 (binding) LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 12:55 PM Subject: [VOTE] Apache ACE as a TLP Hello all, As the discussion about the resolution [1]

Re: [VOTE] Apache ACE as a TLP

2011-12-17 Thread j...@nanthrax.net
+1 (binding) Regards JB -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://wwx.talend.com - Reply message - From: Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache ACE as a TLP Date: Sat, Dec 17, 2011

Re: [VOTE] Apache ACE as a TLP

2011-12-17 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Regards JB On 12/17/2011 12:55 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote: Hello all, As the discussion about the resolution [1] offered no further feedback, it is time for the Apache ACE community to request that the IPMC vote on recommending this resolution [2] to the ASF board. Please cast

Re: [VOTE] Apache ACE as a TLP

2011-12-17 Thread Senaka Fernando
+1 (binding) Thanks, Senaka. On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote: Hello all, As the discussion about the resolution [1] offered no further feedback, it is time for the Apache ACE community to request that the IPMC vote on recommending this

[VOTE] Gora Graduation Resolution

2011-12-17 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hey Guys, The Gora community has VOTEd to graduate from the Incubator. DISCUSS thread here: http://s.apache.org/fm VOTE thread here: http://s.apache.org/AbC RESULT thread here: http://s.apache.org/6Wz In our community VOTE above, 3 IPMC members (myself, Julien and Enis) VOTEd +1. The

Re: [VOTE] Apache ACE as a TLP

2011-12-17 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
+1 (binding). G'luck guys! Cheers, Chris On Dec 17, 2011, at 3:55 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote: Hello all, As the discussion about the resolution [1] offered no further feedback, it is time for the Apache ACE community to request that the IPMC vote on recommending this resolution [2] to

Re: [VOTE] Apache ACE as a TLP

2011-12-17 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 (binding) 2011/12/17 Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl: Hello all, As the discussion about the resolution [1] offered no further feedback, it is time for the Apache ACE community to request that the IPMC vote on recommending this resolution [2] to the ASF board. Please cast

Re: [VOTE] Gora Graduation Resolution

2011-12-17 Thread Niclas Hedhman
I think the Board might have an issue with the 'purpose' of the project (I would if I was in the Board). The formulation a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to persistence, storage, and retrieval middleware for relational and

Re: [VOTE] Gora Graduation Resolution

2011-12-17 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi Niclas, On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: I think the Board might have an issue with the 'purpose' of the project (I would if I was in the Board). The formulation a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of open-source software related

Re: [VOTE] Gora Graduation Resolution

2011-12-17 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Niclas Hedhman wrote on Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:16:46 +0800: is very vague and encompassing. When read, it could mean anything. I recommend a more narrow definition, or risk the Board to reject it. Or, you know, email board@ and ask.