The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we
have added three new committers from diverse organizations and added two
new PPMC members. The codebase of our product has steadily grown and we
have made two releases following the ASF policies and guidelines. Thanks to
the
+1
Jarcec
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 01:00:57AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we
have added three new committers from diverse organizations and added two
new PPMC members. The codebase of our product has steadily grown and
Thanks Arvind!
+1
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Arvind Prabhakar arv...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we
have added three new committers from diverse organizations and added two
new PPMC members. The codebase of our product has
The Apache Lucy community has voted[0] to graduate. We now ask that the IPMC
vote on recommending this resolution (included below) to the ASF Board.
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1 yes, I recommend Lucy's graduation
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 no, don't recommend yet, because...
cheers,
pek
[0]
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Peter Karman kar...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache Lucy community has voted[0] to graduate. We now ask that the IPMC
vote on recommending this resolution (included below) to the ASF Board.
[x] +1 yes, I recommend Lucy's graduation
BR,
Jukka Zitting
+1 (binding)
Awesome work guys Lucy rox!
Cheers,
Chris
On Feb 18, 2012, at 9:31 PM, Peter Karman wrote:
The Apache Lucy community has voted[0] to graduate. We now ask that the IPMC
vote on recommending this resolution (included below) to the ASF Board.
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1 yes,
+1
- Original Message -
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org;
kar...@apache.org kar...@apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Lucy as TLP
+1 (binding)
+1 binding
(It's President's weekend here in the US. It may be a good idea to keep this
vote open until EOD Tuesday)
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 18, 2012, at 9:31 PM, Peter Karman wrote:
The Apache Lucy community has voted[0] to graduate. We now ask that the IPMC
vote on recommending this
Hi,
I will have to cancel this vote thread due to a typo in the vote options in
my original mail below. Specifically, the option to reject the vote
is mentioned as +1 when it should be -1 instead. In order to make sure that
there is absolutely no ambiguity in the vote, I will send out a new vote
The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we
have added three new committers from diverse organizations and added two
new PPMC members. The codebase of our product has steadily grown and we
have made two releases following the ASF policies and guidelines. Thanks to
the
Hi Arvind,
I would encourage removing another ambiguity that I saw -- I think you meant
to only hold this on sqoop-dev, right? That's because by the time it gets to the
IPMC, at least one thing I'm interested in is the proposed PMC, if there are
3 ASF members or not, etc., and that would be
+1.
Jarcec
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 09:22:01AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we
have added three new committers from diverse organizations and added two
new PPMC members. The codebase of our product has steadily grown and
Thanks Chris for your feedback. Yes, this vote is only intended to be held
in the Sqoop community. However, according to the guide on graduation [2],
the guidance on community graduation vote explicitly suggests copying the
Incubator general list when the vote is proposed. Hence, I added the
Hi Arvind,
Okey dok, just thought if you were going to cut down on confusion, it might
make sense to *not* include general@, regardless of the guidelines :) Otherwise,
some IPMC person like me might think (regardless of what you put in your email)
that you are intending it as a VOTE for the
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Imo it's always good to have a few pair of (active!) eyes having oversight.
It's just simply too easy to miss something important - even for a
long-time committed mentor.
True, it is also important about how they
+1 Thanks Arvind!
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Arvind Prabhakar arv...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we
have added three new committers from diverse organizations and added two
new PPMC members. The codebase of our product has
I received Too many unapproved licenses: 39 too but I don't see any
unapproved licenses ( http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/rat.txt )
and any files missing license header except 'conf/groomservers' and
'hama-eclipse-formatter.xml'.
It looks like a bug that rat:check shows the number of
Oh, sorry. I found some files missing license header. I'm going to fix
this problem.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
I received Too many unapproved licenses: 39 too but I don't see any
unapproved licenses (
18 matches
Mail list logo
