For the packaging, a clean source package and a separate binary release is
preferred [1]. This isn't the blocker in my opinion, but something that
you should look at.
[1]:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-typ
es
On 2/25/12 2:52 AM, Edward J. Yoon
Rats - please ignore my vote. I accidentally +1'd the wrong thread.
Ralph
On Feb 24, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
+1 (binding)
Ralph
On Feb 24, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 24/02/12 14:04, sebb wrote:
The directory structures align:
+1
Ralph
On Feb 24, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator.
Sqoop entered Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added three
new committers from diverse organizations, added two new PPMC members,
and made two
On 2/25/12 8:12 PM, Edward J. Yoon edwardy...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks. Actually we're trying to separate them but there's some issues
related with packaging web resources e.g.,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-494
If it's not a blocker, I'd like to fix this issue in the next release.
+1
Verified checksums and signature, ran unit tests, checked license and
notice. I also successfully ran MRUnit tests against Hadoop 1.0 and
0.23 code.
Tom
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Brock Noland br...@cloudera.com wrote:
This is an incubator release for Apache MRUnit, version
I added W3C® SOFTWARE NOTICE AND LICENSE text additionally.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.4/LICENSE.txt
Is this fix the LICENSE problem? If so, I'll re-create new one with this.
Thanks.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Franklin, Matthew B.
mfrank...@mitre.org
+1 (binding)
2012/2/24 Arvind Prabhakar arv...@apache.org:
This is a call for vote to graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator.
Sqoop entered Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added three
new committers from diverse organizations, added two new PPMC members,
and made two
