Hi,
Great. Please make it available in SVN so that I can review.
Done. The files in SVN are already a little bit further then the source in
the release. So there will probably be some small changes.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1408711
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
I'm waiting for my shepherd assignments.
Good, I'll get to that in a moment!
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 14/11/2012 12:14, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
We still have two missing reports: Helix and Syncope. Helix, since
you're only just starting, a very simple report like the one from
Ripple is quite enough for now. Syncope, you already passed the
graduation vote, so there isn't that much to
Wookie is graduated? Shouldn't they be reporting as a TLP, even if
they haven't moved all their stuff yet?
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We still have two missing reports: Helix and Syncope. Helix, since
you're only just starting, a very
Droids seems to be a really easy shepherding assignment. They are on
the watch list for low activity, they are self-aware of this, and they
are having a conversation with the commons TLP about perhaps becoming
a component there. I don't know if there is any contribution any of
the rest of us could
OK, their report was misleading. I'll improve it slightly :-)
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wookie is graduated? Shouldn't they be reporting as a TLP, even if
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wookie is graduated? Shouldn't they be reporting as a TLP, even if
they haven't moved all their stuff yet?
Their graduation vote
Ignore my message, my eyeballs were clearly not awake the first time I
read their report. It was fine.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, their report was misleading. I'll improve it slightly :-)
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Jukka Zitting
-Original Message-
From: Jason Letourneau [mailto:jletournea...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:19 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Steams Project
Hi Andrew -
Sounds great - we'd love to have you onboard.
Just add your name to the
-Original Message-
From: Davide Palmisano [mailto:dpalmis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:17 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Steams Project
Hi there,
I'm working to something[1] (not yet fully open source released) which
could somehow
Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in good
shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the Incubator.
The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StreamsProposal and also
copied as text below.
Please vote.
[ ] +1 Accept Streams into the
Thanks Matthew,
but the page is an immutable one.
how can I do?
cheers,
Davide
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Davide Palmisano [mailto:dpalmis...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:17 PM
To:
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Franklin, Matthew B.
mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in good
shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the Incubator.
The proposal is at:
+ 1 (binding)
All the best,
Suresh
On Nov 14, 2012, at 7:37 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in good
shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the Incubator.
The proposal is at:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B.
mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
Please vote.
[x] +1 Accept Streams into the incubator
Though I do think there's some life also in the alternative name,
Apache Screams, that came up in discussion during ACEU. ;-)
BR,
Jukka Zitting
+1
(Love the idea of Apache Screams, we could then have a Wookie Scream in a
Rave)
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 November 2012 14:49
To: general
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project
Hi,
On
+1
Sander
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
+1
(Love the idea of Apache Screams, we could then have a Wookie Scream in a
Rave)
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 November 2012
+1
On 14 Nov 2012, at 15:24, Ross Gardler wrote:
+1
(Love the idea of Apache Screams, we could then have a Wookie Scream in a
Rave)
+100
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 November 2012 14:49
To: general
Subject: Re:
Great work!
I've got the following questions concerning the ./LICENSE file for the
source release:
There is a list of jar files in the ./LICENSE file of the following form:
activation-1.1.jar doc/LICENSE.cddl
What is the point of including licenses for files which are
+1
-Andrew
On 11/14/2012 04:37 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in good
shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the Incubator.
The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StreamsProposal and also
+1
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
+1
(Love the idea of Apache Screams, we could then have a Wookie Scream in a
Rave)
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitt...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 November 2012 14:49
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Andrew Hart ah...@apache.org wrote:
Could someone please grant me karma to edit the incubator wiki? I'd like to
add my name to a proposal. My wiki username is 'AndrewHart'.
Done.
Incidentally, it looks like Davide Palmisano (see below) is in the same
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:16 AM, James M Snell jasn...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
wrote:
+1
(Love the idea of Apache Screams, we could then have a Wookie Scream in a
Rave)
Ross
+1 to release (IPMC, binding)
[ apologies for the extreme delay :-( ]
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Joachim Dreimann
joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the second release of
Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the
Oh. Forgot one item: so the below is conditional on resolving: the
.md5 does not match the .tar.gz. (I did not examine the signature
(.asc) to see if it matches the .tar.gz)
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to release (IPMC, binding)
[ apologies for the
+1 (binding)
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3
Apologies for any typos
On Nov 14, 2012 6:36 PM, Ryan Baxter rbaxte...@apache.org wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:16 AM, James M Snell jasn...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Ross Gardler
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 11/14/2012 01:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in good
shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the Incubator.
The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StreamsProposal and also
Hi,
2012/11/14 Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com
Oh. Forgot one item: so the below is conditional on resolving: the
.md5 does not match the .tar.gz. (I did not examine the signature
(.asc) to see if it matches the .tar.gz)
I haven't checked the files, but they are placed in svn, and when
Hi all,
more than 72h passed and that vote can be closed and passes with the
following resolution:
six +1 binding votes from following IPMC members:
* Christian Grobmeier
* Alan Cabrera
* Mohammad Nour El-Din
* Roman Shaposhnik
* Bertrand Delacretaz
* Olivier Lamy
two +1 non-binding
Quick followup: couldn't resist so I started creating the main issue
(with subtaks) for Onami, please follow
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5521
best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
On Nov 14, 2012 2:13 PM, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
2012/11/14 Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com
Oh. Forgot one item: so the below is conditional on resolving: the
.md5 does not match the .tar.gz. (I did not examine the signature
(.asc) to see if it matches the
Hi Alexei,
activation-1.1.jar et al are downloaded as part of the build. They're not
included in the source because that's contrary to the Apache principles.
That was noted in our July report (and tracked at [#1]).
Regarding the LICENSE / doc/LICENSE.* files: initially, we kept each
license in a
I've confirmed this discrepancy is the same as what Alexander
Broekhuis posted about, as noted in INFRA-5445.
So 0.2 is all good to go!!
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh. Forgot one item: so the below is conditional on resolving: the
.md5 does not match
+1 (binding)
Ralph
On Nov 14, 2012, at 4:37 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in good
shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the Incubator.
The proposal is at:
34 matches
Mail list logo
