On 24.01.2013 06:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:05:42 +0100:
There are currently no links to the actual vote threads. Also I'm having
a bit of trouble with the feed from mod_mbox, as it's quite short-term
and doesn't seem to be at all complete; that's
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
...the current results are here:
http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator-votes.html
That page (should) get updated every 4 hours...
Cool - it might make sense to integrate with https://whimsy.apache.org/
-Bertrand
On Jan 24, 2013 2:53 AM, Federico Strati fede.str...@gmail.com wrote:
...
The proposed idea is in its very early stage of conception, so any
discussion,
even if completely against it (but with good reasons), will be appreciated
as well as any pointer to related on going efforts in any project.
Hello Greg,
thanks for the reply. I just answer shortly to a couple of points you
raised.
IMO, RDBMS independence is a useless goal.
Software deployments never wake up on a Thursday, and say, let's change
our database.
Always, the goal is to store information, and to make the best use of the
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Federico Strati fede.str...@gmail.com wrote:
...Maybe you may suggest me the appropriate forum as well
As you don't seem to have code or a community yet, and there was
apparently no interest in your original proposal, it's probably better
to start
On Jan 24, 2013 5:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Federico Strati fede.str...@gmail.com
wrote:
...Maybe you may suggest me the appropriate forum as well
As you don't seem to have code or a community yet, and there was
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...While I may disagree with the concept, I have no real opposition to people
attempting to spin up projects here
Me neither, I'm not opposing, just suggesting a way that might be more
efficient.
-Bertrand
Il 24/01/2013 11:54, Bertrand Delacretaz ha scritto:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...While I may disagree with the concept, I have no real opposition to people
attempting to spin up projects here
Me neither, I'm not opposing, just suggesting a way
Good work Brane. Just one feature suggestion: Could you display the
relative time (ie '3 days ago') in the table, and the absolute time in
tooltips?
That would make it much easier to read I reckon.
Cheers,
Joe
On 24 January 2013 04:05, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
A while ago I
We all seem to want a bit of feature creep. I would probably include a
last update time for the page.
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
doesn't take cc's as being on the list or
On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
We all seem to want a bit of feature creep. I would probably include a
last update time for the page.
Guys, you're committers, the code is in Subversion, go wild :)
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
doesn't take cc's as being on the list or
On 24/01/13 16:19, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
doesn't take
If you model the IPMC as a group of volunteers who have collectively
volunteered to mentor and supervise new projects, then the current
situation strongly suggests that we have either too many projects or
not enough volunteers. Calling people 'lazy' has rarely been observed
to get them to do more
Hi !
On 1/24/13, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
So, in my entirely personal opinion, this leaves two directions: more
volunteers or less projects. In the extreme, some would read this as a
reason to close the gates to new projects until we have proven
capacity.
Is
On 24.01.2013 17:19, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
doesn't
On 24.01.2013 22:01, Branko Čibej wrote:
I've noticed before that our archives seem to be incomplete, and
indeed it appears that the mbox files contain only messages To: a
list, everything that actually gets delivered to subscribers by the
list server.
I meant to say, /not/ everything that
On 21.01.2013 21:08, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Monday, January 21, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:
Matt, can you reference the policy that category A deps can't be
sitting in svn in binary? Of course, these folks
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Masanz, James J. masanz.ja...@mayo.edu wrote:
One goal is to have a binary that contains all resources, which can be used
to install cTAKES on a system that does not have an internet connection.
For now we can focus on a first Apache release that doesn't meet
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 21.01.2013 21:08, Benson Margulies wrote:
...
I am referring to this discussion http://s.apache.org/MUZ
Well, that clear enough, even if it is a typical example of how our
founders yell at us but we have no
On 25.01.2013 01:50, Ted Dunning wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 21.01.2013 21:08, Benson Margulies wrote:
...
I am referring to this discussion http://s.apache.org/MUZ
Well, that clear enough, even if it is a typical example of how our
It's unfortunate to have this conversation in parallel here and on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-157.
Also, this thread is a combo of the discussion of ordinary
jars-of-classes (where I'd forgotten the policy) and the much more
tangled question of models, which is what the JIRA is
Great job, Brane!
On 1/24/13 3:50 AM, Joachim Dreimann joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com
wrote:
Good work Brane. Just one feature suggestion: Could you display the
relative time (ie '3 days ago') in the table, and the absolute time in
tooltips?
That would make it much easier to read I reckon.
+1 this sounds great to me, too.
Cheers,
Chris
On 1/24/13 3:08 PM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Masanz, James J. masanz.ja...@mayo.edu
wrote:
One goal is to have a binary that contains all resources, which can be
used to install cTAKES on a system
24 matches
Mail list logo
