I thought about this a bit last night. If y'all are interested I too could
also mentor the project. That should add some diversity to the mentors
list. I see value in it and would like to see this community succeed.
I'm not affiliated with any company.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Eric
This looks like an interesting and useful project. I'd like to volunteer as
a mentor on it.
Thanks,
Tom
On 11 Feb 2013 14:56, Kevin Minder kevin.min...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Knox Gateway Proposal
== Abstract ==
Knox Gateway is a system that provides a single point of secure access for
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
...I'm -1 on this graduation...
-1 from me as well, I agree with Chris' points.
This looks either like an umbrella project (which we don't want
anymore) or a PMC not trusting its committers.
IMO
Hi Everyone,
Our sponsor reached out to Chris Douglas (Microsoft) and Chris Mattmann
(NASA) and they have agreed to be mentors. I have updated the proposal
wiki http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/knox to reflect that.
I'm very encouraged with the level of support we are getting for this
Hi Hadrian,
Currently I would like to keep the focus on Hadoop services to make sure
that we can produce a useful product in a reasonable time frame. We
have been careful with the initial code however to treat all Hadoop
integrations as modular plugins. So we have and will consider
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Kevin Minder
kevin.min...@hortonworks.com wrote:
...Our sponsor reached out to Chris Douglas (Microsoft) and Chris Mattmann
(NASA) and they have agreed to be mentors. I have updated the proposal wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/knox to reflect
Does anyone feel inclined to communicate anything to the board except
'here's the usual podling-by-podling report'
?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
...I'm -1 on this graduation...
-1 from me as well, I agree with Chris' points.
Yes these were good
I wonder: would the Hive community be willing to take an active role
in supervising the work of the hcatalog people with an eye toward
reaching the conclusion that they could be accepted as committers en
bloc?
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue,
Hi Kevin,
I'd like to offer joining the project if accepted for incubation.
I'm actively working in Hadoop (PMC member) and Oozie (PMC member), helped
driving Oozie through incubation and graduation. I'm also the initial
developer of hadoop-auth and httpfs (standalone WebHDFS gateway). In, Oozie
On Feb 12, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
I wonder: would the Hive community be willing to take an active role
in supervising the work of the hcatalog people with an eye toward
reaching the conclusion that they could be accepted as committers en
bloc?
How are you proposing this
Checksum and signature match, NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER look in order.
+1 (binding), aside from a quick check: there are a few jars included
in the source tarball:
apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-src/ctakes-assertion/lib/med-facts-i2b2-1.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
Hi Chris,
Yes, there were a few remaining 3rd party jars that were not available in maven
central yet.
They are tracked via: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-76 and will
be addressed in the subsequent releases (r.1444112 fixed in trunk).
--Pei
Hi folks,
Happy to see such a hugely positive response on the proposal. I'll put
up a vote tomorrow.
Now, on the mentors, I think we have enough at this point and we have
also addressed the diversity concern. I had got the confirmation from
Chris Douglas and Chris Mattmann yesterday afternoon
I thought that the need for diversity referred to the community, not to the
mentors.
I strongly advocate for newly incubating projects choosing their own
initial members (you need only search for the epic thread that resulted
from the Crunch Proposal circa May 2012), but it seems like recent data
So I'm not clear what the next step is here. The 72 hours have passed, we have
5 +1 votes, 2 -1 votes, and a -0.
Based on this page http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html this appears to
be a procedural vote so it just requires a majority.
Are we done or is it traditional to allow
It has always seemed to me that graduation votes are just
recommendations from the incubator to the board. Only the board can
establish a TLP.
In this case, the vote is even less important. The HCatalog gang
proposed to merge into Hive. Hive proposes to give them a less than
warm welcome by some
Classifying this as a procedural vote gives the easy out of majority rule.
It is the IPMC's recommendation to the board that the board then evaluates
to become a TLP or not. Based on Benson's later email he is shucking all
of that to the board. Benson, I would hope you consider -1s to be VETO in
18 matches
Mail list logo
