I'm not so much opinionated as confused here, perhaps because I have a
very linear view of governance.
I like to know how a vote fits into a governance structure or process,
and I've felt for some time that this case (podling goes to existing
TLP) is not well-explained by our structure.
Back in
Absolutely, that's the right thing to do. I, and I believe Greg, were
answering Matt's question rather than you actions ;-)
Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
On 14 Feb 2013 01:15, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
The chair here is trying to lure others
Yups!
:-)
On Feb 14, 2013 6:11 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Absolutely, that's the right thing to do. I, and I believe Greg, were
answering Matt's question rather than you actions ;-)
Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity
On 14 Feb 2013 01:15,
Hi *,
this might seems a bit off topic here but I have noticed that
http://pulse.apache.org/ is not working anymore (and when it was working it was
out of date).
The reason why I write this here (I will probably open some INFRA ticket as
well) is because I believe this site was really useful
Hi Antonio,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Antonio Sanso asa...@adobe.com wrote:
...this might seems a bit off topic here but I have noticed that
http://pulse.apache.org/ is not working anymore
(and when it was working it was out of date)
That's a known issue, I have just created
Thanks Bertrand!
Hopefully will be back one day :)
just taking the chance to restate the utility of this service IMHO (overall for
podlings :))
Regards
Antonio
On Feb 14, 2013, at 5:26 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi Antonio,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Antonio Sanso
I'd like second and extend Benson's point about clarifying how these things
should work. In addition to clarifying what it means to graduate into a
subproject now that that is frowned upon, clarifying how these votes work would
help. I think Chris felt that we ignored his vote and pushed
Hey Alan,
Great point -- thanks for highlighting the concern, and yes, Benson, I'd
like the Incubator PMC to request this clarification from the board. BTW,
not frustrated with you guys at all and wish you the best. Just trying to
help (even if it didn't seem like it) based on my existing
It is a majority decision. In theory, the PMC could decide to
create special bylaws that would change that to a lazy consensus
decision, but then I would have to lay the smack down about why
it is that the US government sucks because supermajorities are
designed to deny proper governance.
In the
Hi Folks,
Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a VOTE
for acceptance of Apache Knox Hadoop Gateway Project into the
Incubator. The vote will close on Feb 21 at 6:00 p.m.
[ ] +1 Accept Apache Open Climate Workbench into the Incubator
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't
s/Apache Open Climate Workbench/Apache Knox Hadoop Gateway/ :)
May want to resend the [VOTE] thread.
On 2/14/13 5:26 PM, Devaraj Das d...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Thanks for participating in the discussion. I'd like to call a VOTE
for acceptance of Apache Knox Hadoop Gateway Project
Hi Guys,
+1 from me.
SIGS pass:
[chipotle:~/tmp/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc7] mattmann%
$HOME/bin/verify_gpg_sigs
Verifying Signature for file apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
gpg: Signature made Wed Feb 6 14:06:28 2013 PST using RSA key ID D218BB0A
gpg: Good signature from
Hi Everyone,
This VOTE has passed with the following tallies:
+1
Chris Mattmann*
Andrew Hart*
Daniel Gruno
Paul Ramirez*
Gary Martin
Ross Gardler*
Ted Dunning*
Alexei Fedotov
Dave Fisher*
Suresh Marru*
Tommaso Teofili*
Andrea Pescetti
Chris Douglas*
Emmanuel Lécharny*
Tsengdar Lee
* -
Thanks for the clarification, Roy.
Cheers,
Chris
P.S. Almost want them to change to lazy consensus, bc you laying smack
down is full of win.
On 2/14/13 11:38 AM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
It is a majority decision. In theory, the PMC could decide to
create special bylaws that
14 matches
Mail list logo
