On 11 March 2013 20:17, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be
>> separate files for each hash type.
>> Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided.
>>
>
> In what way are they "wrong?" It is a perfe
Hello,
This VOTE has PASSED. There were no +0s or -1s. The +1s were:
Chris Mattmann*
Luciano Resende*
Andrew Purtell
Ioannis Canellos
Ioan Eugen Stan
Enis Söztutar*
Mahadev Konar*
Patrick Hunt*
Eric Charles
* - indicates IPMC
I'll work with Patrick to get the details rolling. Thanks to everyone
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary Martin [mailto:gary.mar...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Sunday, 10 March 2013 11:02 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: bloodhound-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Bloodhound from Incubator
>
> Hi,
>
> Following the community
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be
>> separate files for each hash type.
>> Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided.
>>
>
> In what way are they "wrong?" It i
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb wrote:
The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be
> separate files for each hash type.
> Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided.
>
In what way are they "wrong?" It is a perfectly well defined output format
that is the preferred one
Hi all,
more than 72h have passed and we got an additional binding vote from
Tommaso Teofili, with the total of 4 binding votes the current thread
can be considered concluded and passes with following resolution:
four +1 binding votes from following IPMC members:
- Mohammad Nour El-Din
- Olivi
More than 72 hours has passed and the vote has passed with the following votes:
+1 Chris Mattmann (binding)
+1 Jukka Zitting (binding)
+1 Tommaso Teofili (binding)
I will send an email to the Board asking them to include the resolution in the
agenda for the next Board meeting.
Thanks everyone!
-
Thanks!
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Matt Franklin wrote:
> On Monday, March 11, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> > If no one else is willing to take this on, I will finalize the report on
> > Wednesday 13 March in the EDT evening, and it will contain what it
> contains
> > at that moment.
Christian, your point regarding number of active contributors is valid and this
is in deed also something that we feel is a risk to the project. I would say
though that Human Inference is committed to continue the effort even if I
should personally stop committing to it - reason being that the s
On Monday, March 11, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:
> If no one else is willing to take this on, I will finalize the report on
> Wednesday 13 March in the EDT evening, and it will contain what it contains
> at that moment.
I can do it.
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Benson Margulies
>
If no one else is willing to take this on, I will finalize the report on
Wednesday 13 March in the EDT evening, and it will contain what it contains
at that moment.
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I will be travelling the week of 18 March, with somewhat uncer
I still think this is a nice project and it might fit right into the
ASF. Currently I am out of time, so I cannot champion this proposal
nor can I be the most active mentor. Unfortunately it seems nobody
else in the IPMC has an interest in helping this proposal.
Looking at:
http://eobjects.org/tr
Just for reference, I'd add to Sameer's mail that the proposal is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetaModelProposal
We would very much appreciate if one or more apache champions will help us to
get further in the process.
Kasper
-Original Message-
From: sameer arora [mailto:same
13 matches
Mail list logo
