Thanks for taking a look Seb.
Let me mix the issues you mentioned and Ill upload a new tarball.
thanks
mahadev
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 March 2013 00:24, Mahadev Konar maha...@apache.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is a call for a vote to release
Just for reference, I'd add to Sameer's mail that the proposal is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MetaModelProposal
We would very much appreciate if one or more apache champions will help us to
get further in the process.
Kasper
-Original Message-
From: sameer arora
I still think this is a nice project and it might fit right into the
ASF. Currently I am out of time, so I cannot champion this proposal
nor can I be the most active mentor. Unfortunately it seems nobody
else in the IPMC has an interest in helping this proposal.
Looking at:
If no one else is willing to take this on, I will finalize the report on
Wednesday 13 March in the EDT evening, and it will contain what it contains
at that moment.
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
Folks,
I will be travelling the week of 18 March,
On Monday, March 11, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:
If no one else is willing to take this on, I will finalize the report on
Wednesday 13 March in the EDT evening, and it will contain what it contains
at that moment.
I can do it.
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Benson Margulies
Christian, your point regarding number of active contributors is valid and this
is in deed also something that we feel is a risk to the project. I would say
though that Human Inference is committed to continue the effort even if I
should personally stop committing to it - reason being that the
Thanks!
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Matt Franklin m.ben.frank...@gmail.comwrote:
On Monday, March 11, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote:
If no one else is willing to take this on, I will finalize the report on
Wednesday 13 March in the EDT evening, and it will contain what it
contains
More than 72 hours has passed and the vote has passed with the following votes:
+1 Chris Mattmann (binding)
+1 Jukka Zitting (binding)
+1 Tommaso Teofili (binding)
I will send an email to the Board asking them to include the resolution in the
agenda for the next Board meeting.
Thanks everyone!
Hi all,
more than 72h have passed and we got an additional binding vote from
Tommaso Teofili, with the total of 4 binding votes the current thread
can be considered concluded and passes with following resolution:
four +1 binding votes from following IPMC members:
- Mohammad Nour El-Din
-
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be
separate files for each hash type.
Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided.
In what way are they wrong? It is a perfectly well defined output format
that is the
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be
separate files for each hash type.
Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided.
In what
-Original Message-
From: Gary Martin [mailto:gary.mar...@wandisco.com]
Sent: Sunday, 10 March 2013 11:02 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc: bloodhound-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Bloodhound from Incubator
Hi,
Following the community
Hello,
This VOTE has PASSED. There were no +0s or -1s. The +1s were:
Chris Mattmann*
Luciano Resende*
Andrew Purtell
Ioannis Canellos
Ioan Eugen Stan
Enis Söztutar*
Mahadev Konar*
Patrick Hunt*
Eric Charles
* - indicates IPMC
I'll work with Patrick to get the details rolling. Thanks to
On 11 March 2013 20:17, Owen O'Malley omal...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be
separate files for each hash type.
Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided.
In what way are
14 matches
Mail list logo
