Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

2013-10-30 Thread Till Westmann
Hi Dave, On Oct 11, 2013, at 6:08 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:03 AM, ant elder wrote: > >> Vinayak, the release does not need to be redone yet. If it really looks >> like this will hold up getting another vote raise a ASF legal JIRA ( >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

Re: [Vote] Release Apache Stratos 3.0.0 Incubating RC4

2013-10-30 Thread Chris Mattmann
+1 from me (binding): SIGS/checksums pass: [terra:~/tmp/apache-stratos-3.0.0-RC4] mattmann% stage_apache_rc apache-stratos 3.0.0-incubating-source-release https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stratos/3.0.0-incubating-r c4/ % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime

Re: [PROPOSAL] Weave for Apache Incubator

2013-10-30 Thread David Nalley
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Upayavira wrote: > And Apache Wave too (which is what I first saw before I read the title > more carefully). > > Upayavira > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013, at 09:12 PM, Matt Benson wrote: >> Hi, >> I am concerned about potential confusion with Apache Commons Weaver >>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating (RC5)

2013-10-30 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Thanks On Oct 30, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Apologize for the delay @MRQL guys. Just casted my +1 binding VOTE. > > Congrats! > > - Henry > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Leonidas Fegaras wrote: >> Hello, >> It has been 16 days since we opened this vote for our first

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating (RC5)

2013-10-30 Thread Henry Saputra
Apologize for the delay @MRQL guys. Just casted my +1 binding VOTE. Congrats! - Henry On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Leonidas Fegaras wrote: > Hello, > It has been 16 days since we opened this vote for our first MRQL > release. We have collected two IPMC votes but we still need one more > IPM

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating (RC5)

2013-10-30 Thread Henry Saputra
Signatures look ok Hashes look ok License file looks fine (assuming no other 3rd party files licenses involved) RAT report looks good. +1 (binding) Good luck guys and congrats! - Henry On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Leonidas Fegaras wrote: > Hello, > This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL

Re: [PROPOSAL] Weave for Apache Incubator

2013-10-30 Thread Steve Rowe
Random lurker project name suggestion: yarnbomb - see < http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yarn_bombing> /me relurking Steve On Oct 30, 2013 2:00 PM, "Donald Whytock" wrote: > Knit, crochet, macrame? > > Though, honestly, pulling lower-level components together into higher-level > ones sounds a lit

Re: [PROPOSAL] Weave for Apache Incubator

2013-10-30 Thread Donald Whytock
Knit, crochet, macrame? Though, honestly, pulling lower-level components together into higher-level ones sounds a little like granny squares... Don On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote: > Pardon my ignorance, I just looked it up and realized that warp and weft > are indeed r

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating (RC5)

2013-10-30 Thread Leonidas Fegaras
Hello, It has been 16 days since we opened this vote for our first MRQL release. We have collected two IPMC votes but we still need one more IPMC vote to approve the release. We are planning to close this vote on Monday and declare it void if we do not get another IPMC vote. This is our first rele

Re: please follow through to publish doc changes

2013-10-30 Thread Kevin Minder
This was apparently caused by me trying to clean up the Knox status. I will review the procedures. I was nievly expecting a svnpubsub to publish the site and I was wondering why it wasn't. I see now that I missed step #9 here http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html Apologies On 10/2

Re: Code import for Apache Accumulo

2013-10-30 Thread David Nalley
Hi Josh: Separate repo (or not), release cycles, etc are project decisions. As far as importation of the code; it almost certainly needs to go through IP Clearance. http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ If you have questions or need help with that process, don't hesitate to ask. --David On

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Marmotta as TLP

2013-10-30 Thread Jakob Frank
On 30 October 2013 00:55, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > * The mission scope in the resolution looks good. (I didn't do a > line-by-line check of the whole thing.) It's basically the template [1] with the variables replaced and the paragraph about creating bylaws removed: we didn't see the need f

Re: Code import for Apache Accumulo

2013-10-30 Thread Eric Whyne
+1 The authors like the contrib project idea too. On Oct 28, 2013 7:28 PM, "David Medinets" wrote: > +1 for the RStudio integration to be in its own repository. > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Over at Apache Accumulo, we just got a nice bit of code tha

Re: Code import for Apache Accumulo

2013-10-30 Thread David Medinets
+1 for the RStudio integration to be in its own repository. On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > Hi, > > Over at Apache Accumulo, we just got a nice bit of code that > integrates the R programming language (via RStudio) with Accumulo. > This was done completely by the community