Release votes are expected to be a decision of the list of people
empowered by the foundation to make that decision. How that list
of people is populated for podlings is up to the PMC. Right now,
the only list we have is the IPMC itself, as appointed by the board.
If the Incubator wants to
Hi,
Anyone can volunteer.
Just added myself.
I'm not an IPMC member but seen a project through incubation and I'm a PMC
member.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
Hi,
I've put up my hand before but had no response.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (non binding)
Congrats Andreas and folks.
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.comwrote:
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept Twill into the Incubator
--
Regards,
Venkatesh
+1
Thanks,
+Vinod
On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like
to call a vote for Twill to become an incubated project.
The proposal
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
Andrea,
thanks for the link, we did see that project but thought that it is not
relevant because it has not had any activity for 6 years, so it is probably
dead.
Should we be more concerned about this?
There is a
The vote has passed with 13 binding and 10 non-binding +1 votes and no +0
or -1 votes. We are looking forward to the next steps.
-Andreas.
Binding (+1)
1. Roman Shaposhnik
2. Doug Cutting
3. Oliver Lamy
4. Ted Dunning
5. Arun C. Murthy
6. Andrei Savu
7. Arvind Prabhakar
This is valuable feedback, and I am not quite sure how to deal with this
after the vote has already passed.
I took a look at retwill, and it seems that it has not had any activity
(wiki edits, issues, pull requests, releases, commits) for about 18 months.
In fact, it appears that it was abandoned
FYI my vote is binding. :-)
Patrick
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
The vote has passed with 13 binding and 10 non-binding +1 votes and no +0
or -1 votes. We are looking forward to the next steps.
-Andreas.
Binding (+1)
1. Roman Shaposhnik
2.
Of course, IPMC member votes are binding :-)
Here is the corrected result: 16 binding +1, 7 non-binding +1, no +0 or -1
votes.
-Andreas.
Binding (+1)
1. Roman Shaposhnik
2. Doug Cutting
3. Oliver Lamy
4. Patrick Hunt
5. Ted Dunning
6. Tom White
7. Arun C. Murthy
8. Andrei
We had similar issue with MetaModel where there are a lot of projects
with name MetaModel but the name was approved given it needs to always
mentioned as Apache MetaModel.
I think we could do similar approach with Twill?
- Henry
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org
Hi -
Apologies for not getting around to it. I've been on the road and work
continues to be a grind.
Aurora is starting out and Open Climate Workbench looks fine - graduation soon?
That was my initial look at the start, and then oops time's up.
Regards,
Dave
On Nov 11, 2013, at 3:04 PM,
I compared the text of your resolution to that of the template.
All appears to be okay.
Good to see a solid number of people on your initial PMC.
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
Jakob Frank wrote:
Hi all,
the Marmotta podling, whose goal is to provide an Open Platform for
Linked Data, entered incubation in December 2012. Since then, the
codebase has stabilized and two releases were published following ASF
policies and guidelines.
The community has grown, two new
Hi,
Apache Flex is just voting on is guidelines (and is likely to pass
tomorrow) if you need something to base yours off. [1]
We didn't realise that we actually needed guidelines, but a couple of
things come up and we released we didn't know what the default rules
actually were and teh existing
Ping - just a friendly reminder that we're seeking votes on our first
release here.
- hyunsik
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org wrote:
Dear IPMC members,
If there are some reasons why you do not vote, please leave reasons
here. I would like to proceed or cancel
Clean up voting monitoring
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks
This is the first release candidate for Apache Tajo-0.2-incubating,
and it is also the first official release for Tajo.
The PPMC vote [1][2] was passed with 5 binding +1s and no -1.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org wrote:
Ping - just a friendly reminder that we're seeking votes on our first
release here.
Thanks for being patient and persistent, Hyunsik.
The latest Tajo release candidate (RC3) was presented to dev@tajo.incubator on
October
Thanks for that Roy.
So, we _can_ let podlings have their own binding release votes and we
could do our own pTLP type experiments without even needing to go to
the board. We should try that. Not for every podling but just for
select ones where the circumstances mean it will work better than the
19 matches
Mail list logo
