The way I understand it, we are not taking away any power or
possibility from the project.
The PMC can decide to create bylaws at a later point, we're just
starting off with an empty set for now.
In the end, it feels wrong to just copy some default bylaws for
graduation while we had no need for
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Yusaku Sako yus...@hortonworks.com wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate Ambari from Apache Incubator
+1, congrats!
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Andrei Savu as...@apache.org wrote:
[X ] +1 Retire the Provisionr podling
Please tally the vote at [1], right now it's left hanging AFAICS.
-Bertrand
[1] http://s.apache.org/xtG
-
To
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Craig L Russell
craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote:
...I think Storm could do the same. There is specific interest in the
incubating Storm community
but not general interest in the wider Apache community...
+1
Another similar (but older) example is Wicket which
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
...
My guess is that Lazy Majority is used because Majority implies more than
50% of possible voters need to vote.
My guess is that it is a misprint for Lazy
Andrei Savu wrote:
Hi -
We voted [1] to retire the Provisionr podling form the Apache Incubator.
Following the retirement guide, it is now time for an IPMC vote to ratify
the decision.
[ ] +1 Retire the Provisionr podling
[ ] +0 Neither here nor there
[ ] -1 Do not retire the podling
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
...
My guess is that Lazy Majority is used because Majority implies more
than 50% of possible voters need to vote.
My guess
Hi David,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:52 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
...lazy majority is mentioned at
http://ant.apache.org/bylaws.html but I didn't know there was such a
concept in our projects.
Many projects use it. See this Google search:
The reason it might be dis-empowering is that currently one of the main
roles of the PPMC is voting in new committers so if the PPMC is initially
just the mentors then the other podling members wont be involved in that.
It might still be worth trying the approach as an experiment if a willing
Then lets disambiguate by not referring to the
“IP Stewards” as being the PPMC. Seems simple
enough.
On Nov 19, 2013, at 4:34 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason it might be dis-empowering is that currently one of the main
roles of the PPMC is voting in new committers so if
well that type of lazy majority is really a majority of binding votes
cast with a quorum which differs from majority of binding votes cast,
majority of votes cast and quorum (i.e. the needs 3x+1 to release...
because remember you cannot veto releases ;-) though only a fool of a
release manager
Hi all,
I'm happy to announce that this VOTE has passed with the following 7
+1's (all binding):
Mahadev Konar*
Arun Murthy*
Owen O'Malley*
Devaraj Das*
Chris Mattman*
Roman Shaposhnik*
Bertrand Delacretaz*
* - indicates IPMC
Thank you all for voting!
Regards,
Yusaku Sako
On Fri, Nov 15,
Hi,
This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Helix 0.7.0-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our fourth
release at Apache.
Apache Helix is a generic cluster management framework that makes it easy
to build partitioned and replicated, fault tolerant
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:43 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.orgwrote:
So far we've got 2 votes from IPMC members (not counting my own):
I don't understand why yours would not be counted.
And that makes 3.
I'm counting my vote as a PPMC member mainly because I've joined the
IPMC
Hello,
I understand from here[1] that Mentors must be part of the IPMC. Is
there an official application or set of questions that one should fill
out if he or she would like to be considered?
Thanks,
James
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#mentors-ipmc
Hey James
Thanks for your interest in helping out. The IPMC is like any other PMC
within the ASF as the members are voted on based on merit, the one
exception is that ASF members may ask to join the IPMC freely. The
following links explain in detail the structure of the incubator and how
things
+1 for the release.
Mahadev Konar
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Zhen Zhang zzh...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Helix 0.7.0-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our
Please follow the incubation graduation guide
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html see the
Transferring resources
#3.2 user Websites
Websites
1. Transfer the podling website
1. Load the website into its new home. See infra
noteshttp://www.apache.org/dev/#web
.
When I tried to commit the change, I get:
svn: E175013: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: E175013: Access to '/repos/asf/!svn/me' forbidden
On Nov 19, 2013, at 7:49 PM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
Please follow the incubation graduation guide
On Nov 19, 2013, at 10:40 PM, Jordan Zimmerman randg...@apache.org wrote:
Can someone please explain to me what I need to do to have
curator.incubator.apache.org redirect to curator.apache.org?
You need to create an .htaccess file at the top-level of your tree with the
following contents
On Nov 19, 2013, at 10:50 PM, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Nov 19, 2013, at 10:40 PM, Jordan Zimmerman randg...@apache.org wrote:
Can someone please explain to me what I need to do to have
curator.incubator.apache.org redirect to curator.apache.org?
You need to
Greetings,
The Incubator PMC has voted to invite Dave Brondsema, of the Allura
podling and the Forrest PMC, to join its ranks. Dave has accepted our
invitation.
Welcome aboard, Dave!
Marvin Humphrey, on behalf of the Incubator PMC
Greetings,
The Incubator PMC has voted to offer membership to Till Westmann of
the VXQuery podling, and he has accepted.
Thanks for joining up, Till!
Marvin Humphrey, on behalf of the Incubator PMC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
Can someone please explain to me what I need to do to have
curator.incubator.apache.org redirect to curator.apache.org?
You asked this a few hours ago on infrastructure@ and were given
complete and additional answers by various separate people.
Now you have more people
David Crossley wrote:
Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
Can someone please explain to me what I need to do to have
curator.incubator.apache.org redirect to curator.apache.org?
You asked this a few hours ago on infrastructure@ and were given
complete and additional answers by various separate
No there’s a difference. Before he was asking what
infra was going to do to magically make this happen.
That request was denied.
Now we have a better question: what can he do himself
to make this happen? Here there are some answers to
questions that should be addressed in the incubator docs
Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
When I tried to commit the change, I get:
svn: E175013: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: E175013: Access to '/repos/asf/!svn/me' forbidden
Are you able to commit to other stuff?
e.g. your podling status page
or to podlings.xml file.
You would have had that access
Already resolved. A Forbidden response instead
of a failed auth request almost always implies
committing using http.
On Nov 20, 2013, at 12:28 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
When I tried to commit the change, I get:
svn: E175013: Commit failed
Joseph Schaefer wrote:
No there’s a difference. Before he was asking what
infra was going to do to magically make this happen.
That request was denied.
Now we have a better question: what can he do himself
to make this happen? Here there are some answers to
questions that should be
Joseph Schaefer wrote:
Already resolved. A Forbidden response instead
of a failed auth request almost always implies
committing using http.
Great, thanks for following up.
What a committer trap that one is.
A while ago we added that to the FAQ:
Google: site:apache.org/dev committer https
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 7:05 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
...A while ago we added that to the FAQ:
http://www.apache.org/dev/committers.html#commit-403
(although that seems to use old terminology).
http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html
I have moved (and linked) the
31 matches
Mail list logo
