Hello,
We are short of 1 binding vote. Appreciate if any one can review.
Thanks,
Kishore G
On Nov 18, 2013 6:51 PM, "Kanak Biscuitwala" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> Helix 0.6.2-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our
Hi Alex,
I like where you are going with this, but I think that rather than invent a new
role within the ASF we might actually be on the track to how we make the IPMC
more like a normal PMC.
What you are calling IP Auditors is really one example of "Incubator Committer"
- there are two kinds o
Dear Incubator, Please check this IP-Clearance form (see
http://incubator.staging.apache.org/ip-clearance/uima-ducc.html
).
-Marshall Schor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional command
This month two projects, Ambari and Marmotta, are graduating as Apache
Top Level Projects. So taking the words our new VP Jakob, "the podling
is leaving the nest". For me incubation has been a really rewarding
experience, and I'll stay around to help wherever I could.
Thanks guys!
Or
FWIW, I've been saying that I might be interested in helping with IP
auditing of podling releases, but not in the larger role of IPMC member.
You're right that temporary and restricted IPMC membership may be less
work, but here's a larger proposal anyway:
1. Establish role of 'IP Auditor' ('Stewa
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:33 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
> I think this is getting too hung up on vetting releases is the be all and
> end all of PMC membership when really there are other just as if not more
> important things.
Let's say we
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Still, this isn't the hill I want to die on. I think that starting with an
> empty PPMC is good policy for a variety of reasons, but I'm willing to be
> flexible for the sake of building consensus on how to address the truly
> damaging di
