Report Manager for April

2014-03-28 Thread Marvin Humphrey
Greets, We haven't recruited a Report Manager for April yet, and many potential candidates will be occupied with preparations for ApacheCon. I'll volunteer for another month. Roman, how about we divide tasks the same as last time? I plan on leaving May to someone else, though. :) Marvin Humphre

April 2014 Incubator report timeline

2014-03-28 Thread Marvin Humphrey
April 2014 Incubator report timeline: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2014 Wed April 02 -- Podling reports due by end of day Sun April 06 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day Sun April 06 -- Summary due by end of day Tue April 08 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day

Re: [DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

2014-03-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Thanks Marvin. Very useful information and has helped clarify a few things I was unclear on. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@inc

Re: [DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

2014-03-28 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:21 PM, James Taylor wrote: > Thank you, Marvin. This is very valuable, especially the way you walked > through your thought process. Glad to hear, and I know what you mean about the walk through! I didn't fully understand the NOTICE file until I had Roy walk me through

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry 1.3.0 incubating rc0

2014-03-28 Thread Sravya Tirukkovalur
Hi Karthik, Thanks for doing the release! I just realized that the changelog has not been updated from 1.2.0 release. Can you please make the necessary changes? Regards, On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Ramachandran, Karthik < kramachand...@iqt.org> wrote: > This is a release of Apache Sentr

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry 1.3.0 incubating rc0

2014-03-28 Thread Patrick Hunt
-1. The release artifact seems to be totally wrong to me, I think it was built incorrectly/accidentally, it certainly wasn't built the same way as the 1.2.0 release artifact. Some of the problems: 1) the artifact is 500MB - the previous artifact (1.2.0) was 86k, unless you added tons of test data

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry 1.3.0 incubating rc0

2014-03-28 Thread Brock Noland
Yes, I think the 500MB issue was because we moved the .tar.gz files the build downloads to a directory called "thirdparty" as opposed to "target". I made this change because downloading those files after a clean took a very long time for yokels like myself. Some of the issues would be fixed by ch

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry 1.3.0 incubating rc0

2014-03-28 Thread Sravya Tirukkovalur
I cherry-picked the above commit (Sentry-119) into the 1.3.0 local release branch. Now the size of the artifact is 335K and it also has the required files like DISCLAMIER. I can go ahead and push the change if thats ok. Regards, On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Brock Noland wrote: > Yes, I th