Voting is now closed. This vote passes with 4 +1 votes and no 0 or -1
votes. Thank you to everyone who voted. Totals:
+1:
Michael Stack*
Steven Noels*
Enis Söztutar*
Devaraj Das*
* = IPMC
I'll send out an announcement and we'll push the release out once HBase
0.98.1 is released.
Thanks,
James
+1
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thursday, April 3, 2014, Steven Noels wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014, at 08:53 AM, Stack wrote:
>> > +1
>> >
>> > (Promoting my phoenix dev list +1 here)
>>
>> +1
>>
>> (ditto)
>>
>> Keep up the great work.
>>
>> Steven.
>>
>>
+1
On Thursday, April 3, 2014, Steven Noels wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014, at 08:53 AM, Stack wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > (Promoting my phoenix dev list +1 here)
>
> +1
>
> (ditto)
>
> Keep up the great work.
>
> Steven.
>
> -
> To uns
+1 (non-binding)
Verified checksums, built from source and ran basic example jobs.
— Hitesh
On Apr 1, 2014, at 2:42 PM, Siddharth Seth wrote:
> I have created a tez-0.4.0-incubating release candidate (rc1).
>
> This includes license and notice files missing from rc0 release artifacts
> (the
+1 (non-binding)
- verified signature and checksums
- built from source
- examined CHANGES, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, BUILDING, and README files
Jason
On 04/01/2014 04:42 PM, Siddharth Seth wrote:
I have created a tez-0.4.0-incubating release candidate (rc1).
This includes license and noti
+1 (non-binding)
Built form source and ran tests.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Siddharth Seth wrote:
> I have created a tez-0.4.0-incubating release candidate (rc1).
>
> This includes license and notice files missing from rc0 release artifacts
> (the javadoc artifact has these files under re
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Although I have a hard time understanding why people who deserve to
> accompany a podling on graduation do not deserve being on its PMC, the
> solution is simple: the newly established PMC just needs to
> re-establish those people as com
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> One question on interpreting this alternative process. It says, "For
> all releases after the first, votes cast by members of the PPMC are
> binding if a Mentor approves the Release Manifest."
>
> Do we mean all releases after the first using the
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:21 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 April 2014 06:04, Terence Yim wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is to call for a vote for releasing twill-0.2.0-incubating. This
>> is the second release for Twill.
>>
>> Vote on twill-dev:
>> http://s.apache.org/ZJP
>>
>> Result on vote on twill-dev:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> I'll upgrade my vote to +1 (binding)
>>
>> That gives us two +1's from the IPMC. Need one more to release.
>>
>> I realize many are busy (including me) finishing up ApacheCon slides.
>>
As a practical matter the tlp migration scripts seed the
committer group from the list in asf-authorization for svn.
The PMC is taken directly from the resolution, but if there
is no corresponding group in svn (say UCB applies to
the project) then the PMC chair has to seed the committer
group thems
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> ...When consider TLP graduation, all
> committers should be PPMC members?...
At the foundation level (i.e. in the board resolution that establishes
the project) we don't care about committers, it's only PMC members
which are relevant.
I always was curious about if podling has both a group of PPMC members
and a group of committers. When consider TLP graduation, all
committers should be PPMC members?
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:59 PM, sebb wrote:
> There have been a couple of graduations recently where (I think) the
> podling expec
On 3 April 2014 06:04, Terence Yim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is to call for a vote for releasing twill-0.2.0-incubating. This
> is the second release for Twill.
>
> Vote on twill-dev:
> http://s.apache.org/ZJP
>
> Result on vote on twill-dev:
> http://s.apache.org/ksD
>
> The source tarball, inclu
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:59 AM, sebb wrote:
> ...consider whether it is necessary to allow creation of a TLP with
> additional initial committers not on the PMC.
> If so, what is the process?...
Although I have a hard time understanding why people who deserve to
accompany a podling on gradu
There have been a couple of graduations recently where (I think) the
podling expected to be able to specify the initial list of committers
as different from the PMC. In at least one case the podling did not
realise that the names on the board resolution comprise the initial
PMC.
I think there are
16 matches
Mail list logo
