Hi, > We will take care of this for the next release. Is this a blocker for the > release? I'm willing to see other people thoughts on it - but it's likely to be so.
I am also willing to change my vote if someone with more experience than me says it's OK for now. >> There's a binary in the release > This is in test source and is used to run a workflow which only uses jar > files. Again, since this is part of test code, is this a blocker for the > release? IMO yes having a jar in a source release is a blocker - even if it is used for testing. It there anyway you can include the source and/or compile it? > You mean the file names in the release should have apache as the prefix? It's not mandated but does give some extra legal protection.[1] > Maven Doxia plugin fails to convert to html if we add the headers. Will > explore. Perhaps add a README or similar that states all files in this directory are under ALv2 and the reason why the headers can't be added? Thanks, Justin 1. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
