If an objective of a podding is to build a diversified community then perhaps
it should be an explicitly defined graduation criteria? In fact, earlier I have
raised exactly the same question about Tez but I don't think it ever been
satisfactory answered.
As for chances of a project to stick with
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 Jul 2014, at 8:05, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
That's actually the part of the thread that I have a lot of interest in.
Is there
Hi,
it looks interesting.
Do you have an idea about the interactions with other projects (Knox,
Shiro, Syncope, whatever) ?
Regards
JB
On 07/15/2014 04:16 AM, Selvamohan Neethiraj wrote:
Apache Argus Proposal (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ArgusProposal)
== Abstract ==
Argus is a
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
If an objective of a podding is to build a diversified community then perhaps
it should be an explicitly defined graduation criteria? In fact, earlier I
have
raised exactly the same question about Tez but I don't
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
So, I am fond of Henry's hope that the project will solicit a more
diversified
set of mentors and initial committers.
The committer and PPMC list should be honest. If there is no
diversity, that fact must be visible
HI,
Just curious if you could give reference to Apache encourages
disjoint teams to form independent projects, even when those projects
overlap in scope statement ?
- Henry
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Selvamohan Neethiraj
sneethi...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Apache Argus Proposal
Definitely +1, active members, with lack diversity, are more useful.
My original comment was to suggest having mentors come from different
organizations so hopefully could help provide different perspectives
and inputs to the podling.
Never my intention to suggest false diversity to start an
Is it worth a thought to require that new podlings find a champion who is
not employed by the same organization?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Definitely +1, active members, with lack diversity, are more useful.
My original comment was to
There is some overlap between the goals of Argus and Apache
Sentry. Apache encourages disjoint teams to form independent
projects, even when those projects overlap in scope. Additionally,
we feel that the distinct code bases, development teams, and
different approaches to the problem should
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com
wrote:
HI,
Just curious if you could give reference to Apache encourages
disjoint teams to form independent projects, even when those projects
overlap in scope statement ?
Henry,
It generally comes from the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
The committer and PPMC list should be honest. If there is no
diversity, that fact must be visible for it to be tracked.
a big +1
Chris, I know you are pretty overloaded at the moment with podlings, but
would
you be
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com
wrote:
Have you considered reaching out to the Sentry community to see if they
would be interested in bringing Argus existing code base into Sentry?
We did consider it, but decided that the challenge of integrating the two
Hi JB
We will be centralizing the administration and auditing for Knox. And we will
be also standardizing the authentication for web applications for all
components within Hadoop ecosystem, for which we might consider Shiro. I would
like to understand more about Syncope and see how production
Hi,
Last few times I've reviewed LICENSE / NOTICE files in projects it ends up
being quite difficult knowing what exactly has been bundled and exactly how
those bits of included software are licensed. In particular some software (i.e.
bootstap) have moved form an Apache license to an MIT one
This statement might not be quite right:
Even within Hadoop complex eco-system, each components have limited or no
security controls.
How do you define the 'Hadoop complex eco-system'? If that definition
includes projects such as HBase, we have significant security controls, so
that wouldn't be
15 matches
Mail list logo
