With 10 binding +1's and 5 non-binding +1's and no -1's, the vote passes.
Thanks everyone,
Owen
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:34 PM, j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 2014-07-23 22:32, Arun Murthy wrote:
+1 (binding)
Arun
On Jul 21, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Owen
BTW, my prior offer on doing this stands. We just need interest in both
ends.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org
wrote:
+1 (binding)
Diversity and 'nonpartisan' governance will be critical for graduating a
security project, in my opinion, so it will be
Hi,
Anyone clarify this as it's not mentioned at [1].
Whose votes are binding for releases on the podlings dev list? Obviously
mentors and PPMC members, but are IPMC members votes binding? I would assume so
but don't see it stated anywhere. Would Apache members votes be binding?
Assuming IPMC
As a mentor I've (nearly) always advised that if there are three IPMC votes on
the dev list then there is no need to make further noise on the general list
with unnecessary +1's. I therefore point out in the general@ vote mail that 3
binding (IPMC) +1's have been received and therefore there is
Hi,
As a mentor I've (nearly) always advised that if there are three IPMC votes
on the dev list then there is no need to make further noise on the general
list with unnecessary +1's. I therefore point out in the general@ vote mail
that 3 binding (IPMC) +1's have been received and therefore
There is no formal PPMC. When a podling is created all initial committers
are equal. I guess some podlings might create the concept of a separate
PPMC during incubation. I've never advised that in my own podlings
(probably because I'm a believer in an absolute minimum barrier to entry).
I guess
Ross,
The incubator website would be inclined to disagree, and seems to
acknowledge there is formally a PPMC at [1].
Justin,
I think formally, if you review [2] (you may also want to scroll down, and
review later parts of this page on voting), you'll see that the PPMC votes
really don't count
My interpretation (and it's just that) is:
Example: Release Vote
A podling votes to release (VOTE email to dev@project). The PPMC and IPMC/PPMC
(i.e. Mentors) member votes are binding at the PPMC level. This means that
those votes are binding and community votes are non-binding.
If the PPMC
Sounds right to me.
As a separate matter of etiquette and community building, it is usually
good form for mentors to vote last during the community vote and first in
the IPMC vote.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:44 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
My interpretation (and it's just
Yes, this is what I had seen and recommended to podlings I have been
involved with.
- Henry
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:44 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
My interpretation (and it's just that) is:
Example: Release Vote
A podling votes to release (VOTE email to dev@project). The
10 matches
Mail list logo
