Hey guys,
Sorry I didn't see Henry and Justin's comments until just now. Per
Justin's primary concerns about the License stuff: I think we've just made
mistakes in the notice and license files as to exactly how we reference
things. All the category B licenses are mvn binary dependencies (per
One additional thought. As I'm thinking more about the NOTICE and LICENSE
files I think it would be really helpful to have some reviews from you guys
much earlier in the process than the next release vote. While the docs are
helpful and we'll do our best, I'm skeptical we'll get it exactly right
Also, I think that it is important that *all* dependency licenses be
documented in the source release. Speaking as a consumer, I need to know
what dependencies will come in when I compile the code. Marking the
dependencies as source inclusions or as compile time or as test
dependencies or as
Hi Ted,
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, I think that it is important that *all* dependency licenses be
documented in the source release. Speaking as a consumer, I need to know
what dependencies will come in when I compile the code. Marking the
Hi folks,
I'm canceling the vote for Falcon 0.5-incubating, candidate 3 as there were
issues with license. Will have a new RC soon.
--
Regards,
Venkatesh
“Perfection (in design) is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.”
- Antoine de
Looks like the feedback has been well received.
Any reason not to start a vote?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Byung-Gon Chun bgc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jake,
Thank you for the comment.
We had discussions on how to structure mailing lists with our mentors.
We took our
Hi,
Justin, would you be willing to review these changes
once we get them up so that we can make sure we're not making other foolish
mistakes?
Sure just ping me and I'll take a look - it's reasonably straight forward if
you follow this [1]
Justin
Hi Roman,
I will send an email to start a vote soon.
Thanks!
-Gon
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Looks like the feedback has been well received.
Any reason not to start a vote?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Byung-Gon Chun
Hi,
Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on REEF. The discussion
has calmed. I would like to call a vote for acceptance of REEF into the
Apache Incubator.
The proposal is attached below, and it is also available at
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReefProposal
Let's keep this
[x] +1 Accept REEF into the Incubator
On 8 August 2014 22:40, Byung-Gon Chun bgc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on REEF. The discussion
has calmed. I would like to call a vote for acceptance of REEF into the
Apache Incubator.
The proposal
10 matches
Mail list logo