+1. Checked the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files. Checked the
md5, sha, and asc signatures. Built and ran the tests on my mac.
Alan.
Julian Hyde mailto:jul...@hydromatic.net
August 22, 2014 at 0:34
Hi all,
The Optiq community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache
On 23 August 2014 18:51, Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com wrote:
+1. Checked the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files. Checked the md5,
sha, and asc signatures. Built and ran the tests on my mac.
Alan.
Documentation looks good.
I am a bit concerned about the xml files.
Hi!
I was hoping that other mentors (who were explicitly CCed)
would reply, but apparently Richard is the last mentor standing.
Although we can wait for a week or so more (after all, vacations
are in full swing right now) I think it is time for me to ask
this question: Richard, do think that with
I'm not sure that I'm comfortable with the fact that all of your source
code is under net.hydromatic.optiq rather than org.apache.optiq. Your
apache headers also look a bit weird. Every other apache licensed that
I've seen looks like [1], rather than your mix of single line and multi
line
Hi!
in my never ending quest to help boost the
graduation rate I've come across a few cases
where I had to reach out to project mentors.
Typically the initial list would be around 3
individuals, but the reply would only come
from a single one.
I believe we owe it to the projects to monitor
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 3:14 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure that I'm comfortable with the fact that all of your source
code is under net.hydromatic.optiq rather than org.apache.optiq. Your
apache headers also look a bit weird. Every other apache licensed that
Sorry https://github.com/chrismattmann/apachestuff
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 23, 2014, at 3:22 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Check my apachestuff GitHub repo
https://guthub.com/chrismattmann/apachestuff
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 23, 2014, at
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 3:14 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not sure that I'm comfortable with the fact that all of your source
code is under net.hydromatic.optiq rather than org.apache.optiq.
This is pretty cool but I think it underscores the need to get off of free form
files that need to be scraped.
I think that maybe for future reports we can have a JSON file in svn that
people can update. We could then have our report automatically generated from
the JSON file for the board
Hi,
+1 binding
- vote good
- release has incubating in it's name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENCE and NOTICE ok
- No binary files in release
- All source file have apache headers
- can compile source
- test pass
You may want to consider changing for the next release:
-
This vote is now closed, and passes with 10 binding +1 votes, and no +0 or -1
votes.
Vote results:
+1:
Chris Mattmann*
John D. Ament*
Ted Dunning*
Henry Saputra*
Justin Mclean*
Jake Farrell*
Andrew Purtell*
Chris Douglas*
Alan D. Cabrera*
Jan Iverson*
*IPMC binding vote
Thank you to everyone
11 matches
Mail list logo