Hi Incubator.
I might not be up to date, thus I better ask.
I am part of a podling which decided to not have a split committer/ppmc
membership but have kind of 'flat' structure.
We now voted for a contributor to become a committer (but also PPMC member that
way). Does it need some special
Hi!
I am really happy to welcome Rob Vesse,
who has recently joined Incubator PMC!
Great to have you on board, Rob! Please
make sure to subscribe to the IPMC MLs.
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:39 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Chris Douglas
On Jan 21, 2015, at 3:39 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
+1
- Henry
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
the NPanday community and its mentors that
retirement is the only viable path
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
the NPanday community and its mentors that
retirement is the only viable path at this point:
http://markmail.org/thread/litmh5wmwbclrk6n
http://s.apache.org/Efn
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Perhaps there are one or two good ideas in the proposals, but change does
not need to be as jarring.
I hope that the Incubator can make the best of those opportunities.
For example the IPMC ought to confirm with
We should not be focusing on who is/is not ticking a box on a report - it's a
red herring and therefore a distraction.
We should be focusing on identifying and assisting podlings that are not in
receipt of adequate and appropriate mentoring.
There is nothing else of importance.
Microsoft
If you have any hbasey topics you'd think the community would like to hear
about, send in an abstract. We'd love to from you. Register at
https://easychair.org/account/signin.cgi?key=19733317.f4v8ARL3qsrpDXfI
Thanks all,
St.Ack
+1 to retire. The half full aspect is that it looks like people are
doing something more useful with their time.
Hadrian
On 01/21/2015 05:19 PM, jan i wrote:
+1 Even though I do not like to see a podling end like this, but life
support has to be terminated at a point.
rgds
jan i
On
On Jan 21, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Perhaps there are one or two good ideas in the proposals, but change does
not need to be as jarring.
I hope that the Incubator can make the best of those
Thanks, Steve!! (We'd love to talk there, BTW; the challenge is doing
so w/a teaching day-job. We'll see if we can find a volunteer who's
not schedule-conflicted that week...!)
On 1/21/15 2:44 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
+1 for the proposal: I've a lot of respect for the team...I met some of
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
We should not be focusing on who is/is not ticking a box on a report - it's
a red herring and therefore a distraction.
We should be focusing on identifying and assisting podlings that are not in
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
Statements like shepherds dilute mentor responsibility are false. A
shepherd
provides a mechanism for the IPMC to review the Podling/Mentor
relationship.
This is something the IPMC needs to do when voting to
+1
It's a cool idea, but the technology direction has gone a different way.
On Wed Jan 21 2015 at 5:15:33 PM Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
This is a vote on recommending a retirement option
for the NPanday poddling.
It comes on the hills of the general consensus of
the NPanday
That is not what *I* do as a shepherd.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Marvin Humphreymailto:mar...@rectangular.com
Sent: 1/21/2015 7:10 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.orgmailto:general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Next steps for various proposals
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org javascript:; wrote:
How is that different from pruning the
+1 for the proposal: I've a lot of respect for the team...I met some of
them at a workshop in Germany a few years back along with the (then)
Stratosphere project.
I'm would volunteer as a mentor except I'm fairly overcommitted with other
things (like the slider incubating project). If it does
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org javascript:; wrote:
How is that different from pruning the current IPMC membership by
removing inactive members?
Doing *that* would be
19 matches
Mail list logo
