[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Ignite (Incubating) 1.0-RC3

This vote passes with the following tally: 3 +1s from IPMC (binding) +1 - Konstantin Boudnik +1 - Branko Cibej +1 - Roman Shaposhnik Also the following PPMC members votes +1 Yakov Zhdanov +1 Sergi Vladykin +1 Semyon Boikov +1 Alexey Goncharuk +1 Valentin Kulichenko Thanks to everyone. I will

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Slider 0.70.1-incubating

Hi Ted, That¹s exactly what our intent was. Our next release will be called 0.80.0-incubating. Thank you for looking into this. -Gour On 3/24/15, 11:15 AM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: >So the .1 notation is essentially a release candidate notation? > >Sounds reasonable. > > >On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Slider 0.70.1-incubating

So the .1 notation is essentially a release candidate notation? Sounds reasonable. On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Gour Saha wrote: > Hi Ted, > > There has been only one call for vote prior to 0.70.1-incubating. It was > 0.70.0-incubating. However there were 2 issues identified (SLIDER-815 a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Slider 0.70.1-incubating

> On 23 Mar 2015, at 16:40, Gour Saha wrote: > > Hello, > > This is a call for a vote for releasing Apache Slider 0.70.1-incubating. > > This is a source+binary release with one .tar file (appdef_1.tar), which is a > text file used for -ve testing. > > The following 2 issues were identified

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

Thanks, Ted. That's exactly my point. But obviously the choice is up to you (collectively; IPMC). I support however you'd like to proceed. And of course, we'll be following you from @TheASF Cheers, Sally From: Ted Dunning To: "general@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Slider 0.70.1-incubating

Hi Ted, There has been only one call for vote prior to 0.70.1-incubating. It was 0.70.0-incubating. However there were 2 issues identified (SLIDER-815 and SLIDER-814) which are fixed in this release. -Gour On 3/24/15, 9:50 AM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: >Why have there been three release votes on Sl

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Just my 2 cents - "asfincubator" is preferable to "apacheincubator" in > 1) clarity ("apache" alone is less clear) and 2) shorter, and saving > characters on twitter is important. > The counter argument is that outsiders will not have a cl

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Tim Williams wrote: > > Roman, as VP, do you want to start setting this up? > > "...as VP..."? that creates an odd, undesirable, implication. :) No big deal. Just a way of picking one person out of the crowd. And it is already done anyway.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Slider 0.70.1-incubating

Why have there been three release votes on Slider this month (0.70, 0.70.0 and 0.70.1) ? On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > +1 binding > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Gour Saha wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > This is a call for a vote for releasing Apache Slider 0.70.1-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Slider 0.70.1-incubating

+1 binding On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Gour Saha wrote: > Hello, > > This is a call for a vote for releasing Apache Slider 0.70.1-incubating. > > This is a source+binary release with one .tar file (appdef_1.tar), which > is a text file used for -ve testing. > > The following 2 issues were i

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > On 3/23/15 7:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> I would *really* prefer if run it via twitterdeck. Managing group >> accounts that way is WAY better than sharing credentials. >> I'm enjoying this with @TheASF right now and I think this >> way

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

Just my 2 cents - "asfincubator" is preferable to "apacheincubator" in 1) clarity ("apache" alone is less clear) and 2) shorter, and saving characters on twitter is important. On Tue, Mar 24, 2015, at 10:47 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > Roman is the former vp. And I set up ASF Incubator yesterday a

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

Roman is the former vp. And I set up ASF Incubator yesterday and will set up ApacheIncubator today. Then we can hash out which we want to use and how. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 24, 2015, at 5:51, Shane Curcuru wrote: > > Roman, as VP, do you want to start setting this up?

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

I am committing to just that for now. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 24, 2015, at 1:07, jan i wrote: > > But if someone is committing to maintaining @ASFIncubator I am happy with > that. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsub

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

Just as a heads up, you can do this "natively" with TweetDeck teams now w/o sharing passwords: https://blog.twitter.com/2015/introducing-tweetdeck-teams On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > On 3/23/15 7:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > I would *really* prefer if run it via t

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

Yup - @TheASF is an official voice of the Foundation overall, and Sally (and shared team) do a great job running it, and there aren't any changes expected there. @ASFIncubator should be something the IPMC uses to talk about the incubation process and podlings specifically, as well as (perhaps) poi

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

On 3/23/15 7:58 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > I would *really* prefer if run it via twitterdeck. Managing group > accounts that way is WAY better than sharing credentials. > I'm enjoying this with @TheASF right now and I think this > way needs to be promoted for all the @ASFxxx accounts. +1 I woul

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

Thanks, Joe. That is correct: we did issue a very brief blog post when Groovy was submitted to the Incubator, primarily to explain what incubation meant. There are two other occasions where this had happened: the first was for Subversion five years ago; the other was OpenOffice. Again, done in

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015, at 03:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1 to keep @TheASF, will avoid noise or misunderstanding when a project > is graduated + for general announcements it is more consistent. CC'ing press@ If I am not mistaken, we don't promote incubator releases, etc. from @TheASF as th

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

The idea is good, but it takes someone to manage it consistently, exactly what we have with @TheASF. so I am +1 to keep @TheASF But if someone is committing to maintaining @ASFIncubator I am happy with that. rgds jan I. On 24 March 2015 at 08:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1 to keep @TheAS

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

+1 to keep @TheASF, will avoid noise or misunderstanding when a project is graduated + for general announcements it is more consistent. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > ...should we leverage @TheASF for > the incubator-level announcements or should we > establish our own handle?... I would prefer using @TheASF and keeping Sally in the loop so the can keep the overview on those announcements. But if peo

Re: Incubating into Apache

On Tuesday, March 24, 2015, Amareshwari Sriramdasu wrote: > Hi all, > > Its been nice woking for incubating Lens into Apache. Have created a doc at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LENS/Incubating+into+Apache > with respect to Lens work items. I thought it will be useful for new > pr