Hi.
I really like our open way of reporting using the wiki but we have a small
flaw in the procedure.
The wiki is not the place to report a section, so I
will send it to private@i.a.o and hope it will be included.
rgds
jan i.
On 29 August 2015 at 01:00, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Greetings,
Please read all the emails in a thread before responding. Nuff said.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 28, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
> wrote:
>
> Dave, please bring specific, concrete details of alleged ASF Trademark abuse
> by The Document Foundation to the AOO PMC private list. Alter
Forwarding my vote from the Calcite community vote:
+1 (binding)
Julian
> On Aug 28, 2015, at 7:00 PM, Jacques Nadeau wrote:
>
> Thanks for helping clarify Marvin. I didn't realize that Julian was an
> IPMC. I was only counting the two mentors that voted in our vote.
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 20
Dave, please bring specific, concrete details of alleged ASF Trademark abuse by
The Document Foundation to the AOO PMC private list. Alternatively, take them
privately to the trademarks@ a.o list and also get clarification on what
qualifies as trademark abuse.
Please.
This is not the place fo
Thanks for helping clarify Marvin. I didn't realize that Julian was an
IPMC. I was only counting the two mentors that voted in our vote.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Jacques Nadeau
> wrote:
>
> > Vote result:
> > 8 binding +1 votes
Dennis this is now triple posted including one private list. I request you no
longer contact me directly as I thought I was replying privately to our prior
conversation and would have moderated some of my language. BTW what I wrote has
NOTHING to do with the Incubator. I am sure the IPMC has zer
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> ...most of the core developers are currently NOT affiliated
>> with the ASF and would require new ICLAs before committing to the
>> project
> ...
>> == Affiliations ==
>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:47 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
>> wrote:
>>>... There's some GPL/LGPL stuff in there, IMO the proposal should include
>>> a plan for copin
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I would like to start a discussion on accepting HAWQ
>> into ASF Incubator. The proposal is available at:
>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HAWQProposal
>> and
Our trademark is abused by LibreOffice. How do we find a policy where can get
Linux distributions near compliance.
Since LO rebased and declared a new license we can impute how much of that is
really AL 2 via a diff. If the LO code is a nominal percent Apache OO then we
say it is "sufficient" t
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:12 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I believe the BatchEE podling is incorrectly set to monthly reports.
>
> If I look at the schedule, they should have reported in June, but were late
> and reported in July. I believe they should have been taken off monthly
> but weren't and
[Not cross-posting to a private list.]
Dave,
I don't exactly understand what it is expected that trademarks@ would be doing
or clarifying with regard to your specific Foo Manchu case.
Please explain what you mean by a percentage.
- Dennis
PS: How do you see a case where the Manchu project ma
Greets,
Podling reports are due next Wednesday, September 2nd.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2015
Wed September 02 -- Podling reports due by end of day
Sun September 06 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sun September 06 -- Summary due by end of day
Tue Septemb
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Jacques Nadeau wrote:
> Vote result:
> 8 binding +1 votes
> 1 non-binding +1 votes
> No -1 votes
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-calcite-dev/201508.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD%3DPUH70eyPY3u25O4ayimwOXfBBxiX2txUEcNbUCYODXg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
To remove th
Again mixed. Let's substitute a real case.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 28, 2015, at 6:21 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
>
> (Please note mixed private/public lists)
>
>> On 8/25/15 5:17 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>> So there is - to my mind - the obvious stuff:
>>
>> 1. The package description sh
Hi all,
The Calcite community has voted on and approved a proposal to release
Apache Calcite 1.4.0-incubating.
Proposal:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-calcite-dev/201508.mbox/%3CCAKa9qD%3DWA1s03rUEuCUbUbWiBgmC_9N%3D1r39dXjLAKevRt6UCQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Vote result:
8 bindin
/me notes the mixed public and private lists
>
> I.e. assume you're a developer or sysadmin who is *not* an Apache
> committer. You know you need to get a software project management tool
> for the linux machines you maintain, and you've heard of something
> called "Maven".
>
> - What is the actu
Hi
thanks for voting,
we have 3 +1 , 0 +0, 0 -1.
We will continue making the release artifacts.
rgds
jan i.
On 23 August 2015 at 13:43, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - signatures and hashes correct
> - file names contain incubator rather than incubating - but i
(Please note mixed private/public lists)
On 8/25/15 5:17 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
> So there is - to my mind - the obvious stuff:
>
> 1. The package description should ACK our marks. End of Story there.
> 2. The package description should call out those cases where there are
> significant devi
Ping! Any takers for a final IPMC vote? This should be a fairly easy one to
validate, as there were very few changes since the last release (but one of
those is an important fix we need to get out).
Thanks!
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler [mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com]
20 matches
Mail list logo
