Re: Permissive UI Libraries

Tk is a bit difficult to make not look like motif. It can be made look modern, no question, but it takes effort. And the lack of interest in the recent years made it a bit outdated with regards to accessibility and i18n. No question, you can fix all those. But is that a good base for an apache

Re: Permissive UI Libraries

Ask the Apache Tcl project :-) On Sep 9, 2015 4:30 PM, "Jochen Theodorou" wrote: > Tk is a bit difficult to make not look like motif. It can be made look > modern, no question, but it takes effort. And the lack of interest in the > recent years made it a bit outdated with

[VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 0.8.0-incubating [rc2]

This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache Brooklyn 0.8.0-incubating. The Apache Brooklyn community have voted in favour of making this release: Vote thread: https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-brooklyn-dev/201509.mbox/%3C55E9C778.80907%40CloudsoftCorp.com%3E

[DISCUSS] Unomi incubation proposal

Hi! I would like to start a discussion on accepting UNOMI into ASF Incubator. The proposal is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/UnomiProposal and is also attached to the end of this email. This is a bit of a first for me and I’d like to thank all the people that have so far

Re: [DISCUSS] Unomi incubation proposal

Of course +1 ;) Regards JB On 09/09/2015 05:29 PM, Serge Huber wrote: Hi! I would like to start a discussion on accepting UNOMI into ASF Incubator. The proposal is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/UnomiProposal and is also attached to the end of this email. This is a bit

Re: [DISCUSS] Unomi incubation proposal

Sounds great! I'd like to participate in this incubation. My profile in the ASF and with regards to the projects cited in your proposal: PMC Member of Apache Camel, getting involved in Apache Ignite, with 4+ years experience with Apache Karaf at debug level, contributor at OPS4j, 8+ years with

Re: [DISCUSS] Unomi incubation proposal

Hello Raul, Thanks for your quick reply and interest ! As a Karaf and CXF application I think that Unomi could definitely benefit from your involvement ! So welcome on board ! I don't have write permissions on the Wiki but maybe JB could add you ? Best regards, Serge Envoyé de mon iPhone

Re: [NOTICE] corinthia PPMC+committer -= dortef, franz, gbg, ianc, jani, louis, pmkelly

Hello; I am sad to see corinthia move outside the ASF. It looks like it's pretty late to change that and as someone said Apache is not for everyone. In any case I thought I'd comment: In Apache OpenOffice we considered the same situation with GTK, and the general consensus at the time is

Re: Calcite graduation vote

Indeed! Huge step and best of luck to you guys as a future TLP. Thanks, Roman. On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:50 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Big step. > > > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > >> Pursuant to the graduation policy[1] it is my

[VOTE] Release Apache htrace-4.0.0-incubating

Apache HTrace (incubating), has voted to release the below referenced Apache HTrace 4.0.0-incubating release candidate. Dear IPMC, please vote on our second release candidate as an Apache Incubator project. The source tarball, hashes, and signing are here:

Re: [NOTICE] corinthia PPMC+committer -= dortef, franz, gbg, ianc, jani, louis, pmkelly

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hello; > > I am sad to see corinthia move outside the ASF. It looks like it's pretty > late to change that and as someone said Apache is not for everyone. In any > case I thought I'd comment: > > In Apache OpenOffice we

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache htrace-4.0.0-incubating

+1 (Carry-over from the htrace dev list) St.Ack On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Colin P. McCabe wrote: > Apache HTrace (incubating), has voted to release the below referenced > Apache HTrace 4.0.0-incubating release candidate. > > Dear IPMC, please vote on our second

Re: [VOTE] Accept MADlib into the Apache Incubator

+1 (not binding) On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Atri Sharma wrote: > +1 > On 10 Sep 2015 08:11, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 07:37PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > Following the discussion earlier: > > >

Re: Calcite graduation vote

That's great news! As a Calcite fan, I am personally looking forward to it happening. On 9 Sep 2015 10:42, "Julian Hyde" wrote: > Pursuant to the graduation policy[1] it is my pleasure to inform the IPMC > that the Calcite community has completed a discussion on graduation[2]

[VOTE] Accept MADlib into the Apache Incubator

Following the discussion earlier: http://s.apache.org/TE6 I would like to call a VOTE for accepting MADlib community as a new ASF incubator project. The proposal is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MADlibProposal and is also included at the bottom of this email. Vote is

Re: [VOTE] Accept MADlib into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 07:37PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Following the discussion earlier: >http://s.apache.org/TE6 > > I would like to call a VOTE for accepting > MADlib community as a new ASF incubator > project. > > The proposal is available at: >

Re: [VOTE] Accept MADlib into the Apache Incubator

+1 On 10 Sep 2015 08:11, "Konstantin Boudnik" wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 07:37PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Following the discussion earlier: > >http://s.apache.org/TE6 > > > > I would like to call a VOTE for accepting > > MADlib community as a new