Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB Hyracks 0.2.16-incubating (RC3)

On 2015-09-22 20:11, Ian Maxon wrote: First let me just preface by saying this is just how I understand it... If I am wrong anyone please feel free to chime in. There are indeed two votes, one is the vote on dev@asterixdb.a.i.o where the folks we need to vote (the binding votes) are the Podling

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB Hyracks 0.2.16-incubating (RC3)

Got it! Thx. On 9/22/15 11:11 AM, Ian Maxon wrote: First let me just preface by saying this is just how I understand it... If I am wrong anyone please feel free to chime in. There are indeed two votes, one is the vote on dev@asterixdb.a.i.o where the folks we need to vote (the binding votes)

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB Hyracks 0.2.16-incubating (RC3)

First let me just preface by saying this is just how I understand it... If I am wrong anyone please feel free to chime in. There are indeed two votes, one is the vote on dev@asterixdb.a.i.o where the folks we need to vote (the binding votes) are the Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC)

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB Hyracks 0.2.16-incubating (RC3)

Same Q here - did we need to vote on a different list too? On Sep 22, 2015 8:55 AM, "Chen Li" wrote: > Ian, > > I already did my "+1". Do I have to say "Binding" in order to include > it? Still not quite clear about the protocol. > > Chen > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:20 AM,

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB Hyracks 0.2.16-incubating (RC3)

Oh, I see, thank you for the correction Ate. I wasn't aware that the votes from IPMC members on the dev@ vote counted in the general@ vote without being recast explicitly. I'll be sure to add those votes to the tally next time around. -Ian On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Ate Douma

[VOTE] Release Apache htrace-4.0.1-incubating

Apache HTrace (incubating), has voted to release the below referenced Apache HTrace 4.0.1-incubating release candidate. Dear IPMC, please vote on our second release candidate as an Apache Incubator project. The source tarball, hashes, and signing are here:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache htrace-4.0.1-incubating

Carry-over from the htrace dev list, +1 (binding) St.Ack On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Colin P. McCabe wrote: > Apache HTrace (incubating), has voted to release the below referenced > Apache HTrace 4.0.1-incubating release candidate. > > Dear IPMC, please vote on our

Re: Evaluation the interest of EasyMock at Apache

Hi Henri, Thanks for the interest for moving EasyMock to be in Apache incubator. All projects coming in incubator should not stay longer than it needs to be. The main purpose of a project to be in incubator is to help new people coming to Apache to learn to develop in the Apache Way [1]. This

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB Hyracks 0.2.16-incubating (RC3)

Ian, I already did my "+1". Do I have to say "Binding" in order to include it? Still not quite clear about the protocol. Chen On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Ian Maxon wrote: > The vote for releasing Apache AsterixDB Hyracks 0.2.16-incubating > passed with 3 binding +1s, 0

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB Hyracks 0.2.16-incubating (RC3)

The vote for releasing Apache AsterixDB Hyracks 0.2.16-incubating passed with 3 binding +1s, 0 non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1 votes. Binding +1s: Till Westmann Justin Mclean Henry Saputra I've filed a JIRA issue to start addressing the issues Justin mentioned before the next release:

Evaluation the interest of EasyMock at Apache

Hi, I'm the current lead developer and are mostly maintaining all of EasyMock, the venerable mocking framework. I'm thinking about moving it to Apache. My main interest is to find a new community for it. However, I don't want it to stay in the incubator forever. So I won't move to Apache if I