[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache SINGA 0.1.0 (incubating)

Thanks everyone for your votes and comments. I'm delighted to announce that this vote passes with the following results: 3 binding +1s: Alan Gates Thejas Nair Edward J. Yoon 0 non-binding +1s No 0s or -1s. We will remove the suffix (RC2) of the file names (thanks to Edward for pointing it

[DISCUSS] Concerted Incubation Proposal

Hi All, We would like to propose accepting Concerted, a DIY platform for building highly scalable and performance oriented in memory support engines for big data platforms into ASF Incubator. Please find proposal at following link: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ConcertedProposal Please find

Re: [DISCUSS] Mynewt Incubation Proposal

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Sterling Hughes wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:24 PM, David Nalley wrote: >> Hi Sterling, this looks fascinating. >> I have a few questions for you: >> >> How many arches are you targeting initially? I saw ARM and MIPS >>

Re: Concerted Proposal

Thanks for your opinion. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > I just wanted to state the fact that mentoring is not expected to take an > active role in technical questions. I agree for that and I understand that we are not looking for technical

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SINGA 0.1.0 (incubating)

+1 Examined the LICENSE, NOTICE, README, and DISCLAIMER files. Checked the signatures and checksum. The sha256 checksum matches what is in the email, however, the .sha256 file seems like a different binary file. The .md5 hash is the only hash most projects seem to publish, so that might be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SINGA 0.1.0 (incubating)

+1 The final release is generally w/o any suffix, e.g., "-SNAPSHOT", "-RC*". So, if the vote closes positive, the binary files will need to be renamed and digitally signed again, before upload them on the distribution sites. On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Thejas Nair

Re: Concerted Proposal

Hi, On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > ...Concerted isn't > what most of the Incubator proposals are these days. > It is much more about promise of technology rather > than something that exists today I don't see a problem with incubating that

Re: Concerted Proposal

I just wanted to state the fact that mentoring is not expected to take an active role in technical questions. Moreover arguing that "bootstrapping the existing code base and community into ASF will generate much more interest" clearly shows an excessive fascination with the Apache brand. In the

Re: Concerted Proposal

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote: > ...I just wanted to state the fact that mentoring is not expected to take an > active role in technical questions I agree that's not required from mentors, and I don't think people were asking for that. OTOH if

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SINGA 0.1.0 (incubating)

+1 I looked at the signatures, the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files, checked for any binary files in the distro, and checked that source files have the appropriate license header. Alan. Wang Wei September 29, 2015 at 19:47 Hi all, The SINGA community

Re: [DISCUSS] Mynewt Incubation Proposal

>> We have two types of regression tests currently implemented: >> >> - "Native": Simulated on Linux and Mac OS X. We compile the OS & >> libraries with 32-bit GCC, and then use setjmp() and longjmp() to save >> and restore our task stacks, and signals to provide a timing interval. >> Every egg