Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > I'd like to call a VOTE on that proposal, which is on the wiki at > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ImpalaProposal, and which I've pasted > below. > > During the discussion period, the proposal has been amended to add

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Mike Percy wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson > wrote: > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on that proposal, which is on the wiki at > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ImpalaProposal, and

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Best Regards! - Luke Han On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Julien Le Dem wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Mike Percy wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Best Regards! - Luke Han On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Julien Le Dem wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Edward J. Yoon > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:26

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Nov 24, 2015 14:33, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to > call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is > pasted below and also available on the wiki at: >

Re: Incubator mail archives lagging badly

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Mike Percy wrote: > Thanks Shane for the pointer! I hacked a bit on the Javascript over the > weekend and was able to make the window panes resizable. I also added some > keyboard shortcuts ("j", "k") to move between messages. This is what I

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:29PM, Harbs wrote: > This kind of underscores my observation that a large part of this debate is > driven by source control technologies. > > RTC seems popular for projects using Git, while CTR seems popular in > communities using SVN. Well, Apache Bigtop is now

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 02:00AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > The suggestion is to add it to the proposal template - that's before > incubation starts. I think this is a great idea! > -Original Message- > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, November 23,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck! On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to >> call a VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to > call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is > pasted below and also available on the wiki

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:17AM, Chris Mattmann wrote: > Hi Alex, > > We don’t have to hear from every author. If we don’t have an ICLA > or SGA on file for them, we’ll remove their code from the initial Yup, that's the concern I was trying to address by asking to reach out to the contributors.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Luke Han wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > > Best Regards! > - > > Luke Han > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Julien Le Dem wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:49 PM,

Re: Incubator mail archives lagging badly

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Mike Percy wrote: > > http://45.79.81.207/archives/incubator-general/201511.mbox/thread > > Mike, as someone who uses the archives a lot, I really appreciate the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:39 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > +1 > On Nov 24, 2015 14:33, "Todd Lipcon" wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like > to > > call a VOTE on acceptance of

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Alex, > > Please re-read my email. As I stated we don’t take code that > authors don’t want us to have. Surely it depends on how that work was licensed before the ASF?

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > On 11/23/15, 8:23 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" > wrote: > > >Alex, > > > >Please re-read my email. As I stated we don’t take code that > >authors don’t want us to have. So far, we haven’t

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 11/23/15, 8:23 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" > > wrote: > > > > >Alex, > > > > > >Please re-read my email. As I

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tuesday, November 24, 2015, Carl Steinbach wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Luke Han > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Best Regards! > > - > > > > Luke Han > > > > On

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

-1 (binding). I'd like to see the community start with CTR, rather than mandatory reviews via gerrit. On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > Hi - > > The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been > sufficient opportunity for

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tuesday, November 24, 2015, Carl Steinbach wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:39 PM, John D. Ament > > wrote: > > > +1 > > On Nov 24, 2015 14:33, "Todd Lipcon" > > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

-1 (binding) I’d like to see the project start with CTR and use RTC only for specific cases (like where tests must be modified, over X (1000 lines?) of code added, etc. Ralph > On Nov 24, 2015, at 2:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > > Hi - > > The [DISCUSS] thread has been

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

-1 (binding) I’d like to see the project start with CTR and use RTC only for specific cases (like where tests must be modified, over X (1000 lines?) of code added, etc. I must say I do find the part about achieving quality through automation attractive, but following that up with requiring RTC

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > -1 (binding) > I’d like to see the project start with CTR and use RTC only for specific > cases (like where tests must be modified, over X (1000 lines?) of code > added, etc. > > I must say I do find

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > -1 (binding) > I’d like to see the project start with CTR and use RTC only for specific > cases (like where tests must be modified, over X (1000 lines?) of code > added, etc. > > Ralph > > > > On Nov

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

-1 (binding) Starting with RTC is a poor way to attract new community members. I'd like to see this community use CTR instead of mandating gerrit reviews. (ref: other-threads about lack of trust, and control issues; poor basis for a community) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Todd Lipcon

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > Personally, I am saying RTC is destructive, and am willing to give every > podling that message. Delivering that message by informing podlings of your experience is completely acceptable. However, if anyone attempts to

RE: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

Brock, I can assure you that's not Greg's style so I doubt you have anything to worry about. -Original Message- From: Brock Noland [mailto:br...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 9:54 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...) >

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

Thanks, Ross. Quite true. ... and I said as much, but you[Brock] clipped it. Right before that "Personally, ...", I wrote this line: "Nobody is forcing anything." On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > Brock, I can assure you that's not Greg's

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

Great! :) (I admittedly clipped a clipped message so I apologize for missing "Nobody is forcing anything.") On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Thanks, Ross. Quite true. ... and I said as much, but you[Brock] clipped > it. Right before that "Personally, ...",

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Patrick Angeles > wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Jake Farrell >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 Great to see this coming to the foundation! On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like > > to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards, Arvind Prabhakar On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to > call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is > pasted below and

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -Jake On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to > call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is > pasted below and also available on the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to > call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is > pasted below and also available on the wiki at: >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 from me. ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > Hi - > > The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been > sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring Impala > to the ASF Incubator. > > I'd like to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Good luck! On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to > call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is > pasted below and also available

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > Hi - > > The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's > been sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring > Impala to the ASF Incubator. > > I'd like to call a VOTE on

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 Regards JB On 11/24/2015 08:32 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: Hi all, Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is pasted below and also available on the wiki at:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards, Arvind Prabhakar On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > Hi - > > The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been > sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring Impala > to the ASF

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > Arvind Prabhakar > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Jake Farrell wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -Jake > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like > to > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

+1 from me binding ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: >> [X] +1, accept Kudu into the Incubator > > (binding) > > Jarcec > >> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems

Re: [VOTE] Accept S2Graph into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) Good luck. On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 24 November 2015 at 09:55, Julien Le Dem wrote: >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Stack wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>>

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Patrick Angeles wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Jake Farrell wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> -Jake >> >> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Todd Lipcon

Re: [VOTE] Accept S2Graph into Apache Incubation

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > +1 > good luck > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > > Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal. > > > > I would like to

Re: [VOTE] Accept S2Graph into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > Hello folks, > > Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal. > > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on S2Graph joining the ASF as an > incubation project. > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours:

Re: [VOTE] Accept S2Graph into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > Hello folks, > > Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal. > > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on S2Graph joining the ASF as an > incubation project. > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours:

Re: [VOTE] Accept S2Graph into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Stack wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > > > Hello folks, > > > > Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal. > > > > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on

[VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

Hi all, Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is pasted below and also available on the wiki at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KuduProposal The proposal is unchanged since the

Re: [VOTE] Accept S2Graph into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) On 24 November 2015 at 09:55, Julien Le Dem wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Stack wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: >> >> > Hello folks, >> > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like > to call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal > is pasted below and also available on the wiki at: >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 > On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:33 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like >> to call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to > call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal is > pasted below and also available on the wiki at: >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

> [X] +1, accept Kudu into the Incubator (binding) Jarcec > On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:32 AM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > Hi all, > > Discussion on the [DISCUSS] thread seems to have wound down, so I'd like to > call a VOTE on acceptance of Kudu into the ASF Incubator. The proposal

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenMiracl for Incubation

On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 07:43 +, Brian Spector wrote: > Hi All, > > thanks for everyone's feedback and Sterling thank you for graciously coming > on board as an additional mentor. > > I'd like to propose that the proposed Apache OpenMiracl incubation project > be renamed to Apache Milagro.

Re: [VOTE] Accept S2Graph into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) Good luck Rob On 24/11/2015 00:53, "Hyunsik Choi" wrote: >Hello folks, > >Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal. > >I would like to call for a [VOTE] on S2Graph joining the ASF as an >incubation project. > >The vote is open for at least 72 hours:

Re: [VOTE] Accept S2Graph into Apache Incubation

I forgot to throw my +1 for S2Graph. Here is my +1 (binding). Best regards, Hyunsik On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Seetharam Venkatesh wrote: > +1 binding. > > Thanks! > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:06 PM Byung-Gon Chun wrote: > >> +1 non-binding

[RESULT][VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.0-incubating Release

The vote for releasing Apache TinkerPop 3.1.0-incubating passed with 3 binding +1s, 0 non-binding +1s, and no 0 or -1. Binding +1s: Daniel Gruno Sergio Fernández Justin Mclean Thanks to those who were able to take the time to vote. Justin/Sergio, will try to get LICENSE/NOTICE solid for the

Re: [VOTE] Accept S2Graph into Apache Incubation

+1 (binding) On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Rob Vesse wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Good luck > > Rob > > On 24/11/2015 00:53, "Hyunsik Choi" wrote: > > >Hello folks, > > > >Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal. > > > >I would like to

Re: Incubator mail archives lagging badly

Thanks Shane for the pointer! I hacked a bit on the Javascript over the weekend and was able to make the window panes resizable. I also added some keyboard shortcuts ("j", "k") to move between messages. This is what I have so far: http://45.79.81.207/archives/incubator-general/201511.mbox/thread

Re: [VOTE] Accept S2Graph into Apache Incubation

+1 good luck On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > Hello folks, > > Thanks for all the feedback on the S2Graph Proposal. > > I would like to call for a [VOTE] on S2Graph joining the ASF as an > incubation project. > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours: >