[VOTE][RESULT] Retire Ripple

The VOTE passes, with the following +1s (* indicates IPMC): Luciano Resende* Roman Shaposhnik* Ross Gardler* Brad Kolarov Danese Cooper* Christian Grobmeier* Konstantin Boudnik* Thanks for voting, everyone. I plan to hold off on closing down the Ripple development resources until

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > Attached a patch to: > 1. change from poding.i.a.o to poding.a.o > 2. Require the incubator logo and that it be prominent Thanks, Niall. However, the general@incubator list is configured to strip attachments,

RE: [PORPOSAL] Fineract

For those who didn't work on the proposal I can assure you there is no confusion in this incoming community over who makes the decisions. I recommended the same model I advocate in the IPMC. The model we started with. Champion brings the project in, is responsible if problems arise but is nt

[RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] JMeter Dashboard / Report

Hello, == +1 votes == * David Nalley (ke4qqq) * Bruno Demion (milamber) * Philippe Mouawad (pmouawad) With no -1 vote, the IP Clearance for JMeter Dashboard / Report vote passes. I will update the status page of IP Clearance to add the acceptance of donation. Thanks for the voters.

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: > > > Attached a patch to: > > 1. change from poding.i.a.o to poding.a.o > > 2. Require the incubator logo and that it be

Re: [PORPOSAL] Fineract

Hey all, hope this finds you well. : o) For now I'll leave my Jedi mind power aside: As part of the proposing community I was following this conversation with mixed feelings. On one side I think it is good to see some healthy conversation about a topic, on the other side it feels a bit weird to

Re: [PORPOSAL] Fineract

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Markus Geiß wrote: >... > Joining Apache, preparing the proposal, nominating the initial committers, > and agreeing on mentors is a process governed by our community by having a > healthy discussion and finding consensus on all of these things. >

Re: [PORPOSAL] Fineract

Thanks for the reply ... maybe I wasn't clear enough ... I was referring to our work prior to proposal ... we wanted our community to be in consensus with this step b/c it also has an impact to us in a whole ... we are very excited to join Apache and are aware of the fact that there could not be

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Hi Owen This is good. The SGA stuff is still in progress. Cisco is very interested in Metron and would like to be involved (in fact the opensrc folks at Cisco seem to be unaware of the Metron proposal - till we talked about the SGA). Would it be possible to put an addendum to the original

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

Debo, Typically, at this point, it would be recommended to vote in additional committers. John On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 8:43 PM Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: > Hi Owen > > This is good. > > The SGA stuff is still in progress. Cisco is very interested in Metron and > would like

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: > Hi Owen > > This is good. > > The SGA stuff is still in progress. Cisco is very interested in Metron and > would like to be involved (in fact the opensrc folks at Cisco seem to be > unaware of the Metron proposal -

Re: svn commit: r1718228 - in /incubator/public/trunk/content: podlings.xml projects/metron.xml

Owen, I'd strongly advise you to add Metron to reporting group 1 and make the first report in January instead of trying to rush a report in for this month. The podling reports are already past due. John On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 4:50 PM wrote: > Author: omalley > Date: Sun

Re: svn commit: r1718228 - in /incubator/public/trunk/content: podlings.xml projects/metron.xml

Thanks, that is a good point. .. Owen On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 3:48 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Owen, > > I'd strongly advise you to add Metron to reporting group 1 and make the > first report in January instead of trying to rush a report in for this > month. The podling

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

With 10 binding +1's and 10 non-binding +1's and no -1's, the vote to accept Metron in the Apache Incubator passes. Thank you everyone. Binding +1's: Owen O'Malley Chris Nauroth Chris Mattmann Seetharan Venkatesh P. Taylor Goetz Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli Brock Noland Billie Rinaldi

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> > Attached a patch to: >> > 1. change from poding.i.a.o to poding.a.o >> > 2. Require the incubator logo and that it be prominent Thanks, Niall. For the time being, I'm -1 and going to play devil's advocate,

Re: December reports - Eagle and Concerted are running late

I just posted Concerted’s report to the wiki. Apologies that it is so late, but Guarav Shukla from Concerted wrote the report a couple of days ago and wasn’t able to post it due to lack of karma. I figured that if they’ve gone to the effort to write the report, we might as well file it. I also

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Metron into Apache Incubator

The vote has finished, but I think it is important to get an SGA here. This is exactly the issue that hung up Kylin's graduation. On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) >