Re: [VOTE] Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator Podling

+1 (binding) -C On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > OK the discussion is now completed. Please VOTE to accept Joshua > into the Apache Incubator. I’ll leave the VOTE open for at least > the next 72 hours, with hopes

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)

Hello esteemed PPMCs, is there something you need for Apache Wave to get some more traction on this mailinglist? Right now this is kinda blocking here, while we're toiling along inside the project ;) Please consider investing a modest amount of time to get this through the door. The really

[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.9.0-incubating (RC3)

Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache SystemML version 0.9.0! The PPMC vote thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00267.html And the result: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00279.html The tag

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)

LICENSE file looks good NOTICE file looks good DISCLAIMER file exists Signature file looks good Hash files look good +1 (binding) Small nit, the NOTICE file seemed to have need the year to be updated. - Henry On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Andreas Kotes wrote:

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

If no one else steps forward to pick up the task of integrating this new material into the Licensing How-To, I'm happy to. Marvin Humphrey On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > Thanks so much for helping to clarify these details. Having just worked >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator Podling

OK, cool... Just thought the topic warranted some level of discussion ;) > On Feb 1, 2016, at 10:31 AM, Tom Barber wrote: > > Hello! I'm a code-aholic, you'll be getting regular commits from me. > > Regards, > > Tom > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Mattmann, Chris

Re: [VOTE] Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator Podling

I know this is specifically called-out in the proposal, but it does seem worthy of further discussion. This has a pretty small list of initial committers, esp when one considers how over-booked 2 of them appear to be. So, realistically, how active do both Chris and Lewis expect to be? > On Jan

New mentors for Taverna?

The majority of the mentors of the Taverna podling have raised concerns that they no longer have sufficient time available to help Taverna in the incubator. In effect we will then have 2 semi-active mentors remaining for continuity. This has become a concern because Taverna is picking up speed

[RESULT][VOTE] Accept Beam into the Apache Incubator

Hi all, this vote passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Jean-Baptiste Onofré, Bertrand Delacretaz, Sergio Fernandez, Henry Saputra, Taylor Goetz, Jim Jagielski, Suresh Marru, Daniel Kulp, Chris Nauroth, James Taylor, Greg Stein, John D. Ament, Ted Dunning, Venkatesh Seetharam,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator Podling

Hello! I'm a code-aholic, you'll be getting regular commits from me. Regards, Tom On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Hey Jim, > > This is a valid concern, one that I hope is mediated by taking > however long it takes in Incubation

Re: [VOTE] Accept Joshua as an Apache Incubator Podling

Hey Jim, This is a valid concern, one that I hope is mediated by taking however long it takes in Incubation to attract some new committers to work on the project. Hopefully too you saw how long I took to allow the discussion to occur and so forth. Lewis has actively contributed to Joshua already