Incubator Lists

2016-02-05 Thread Christopher
Hi all, I'm just getting familiar with the incubator project, because I am anticipating working with some future projects which might submit proposals to go through incubation, and I'd like to gain some greater familiarity with how things operate in this space. I've already started reading

Re: Incubator Lists

2016-02-05 Thread Gaurav Shukla
Hi Christopher, Thanks for your interest in incubator community, I am also quite new to the community but here's what I've figured out so far. - All the project proposals and general discussion regarding incubator projects happen at general@incubator.apache.org - Each podling has a dev

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

2016-02-05 Thread Sean Busbey
Encouraging use of Whisker from the Apache Creadur project is another avenue: http://creadur.apache.org/whisker/ On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > >> But better conventions on the format and content of the files that would > >> make

Re: Making license adjustment tools publicly available

2016-02-05 Thread sebb
On 5 February 2016 at 00:14, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > a podling recently asked me why: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/ > https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/copy2license.pl > are only available to commiters. I see >

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

2016-02-05 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > When I saw this topic in the past, the answer was "nothing" [1] What we’re legally required to do (i.e. nothing) is reasonably clear, but what policy or culturally is the best option is perhaps unclear. Thanks, Justin -

Re: Making license adjustment tools publicly available

2016-02-05 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 11:24 AM, sebb wrote: > On 5 February 2016 at 00:14, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> Hi! >> >> a podling recently asked me why: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/relicense/ >>

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

2016-02-05 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
Hi, A bit of status. Most of the infrastructure is created. The Jira space is waiting for a reboot of the system and will only be available next Tue. The git repo is however available and we can start the code grant process (by litbit, whom afaik owns the IP). Committers should continue to

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

2016-02-05 Thread Tony Faustini
Hi Hadrian, thanks so much for setting up the infrastructure. I will ask the remaining individuals to submit their ICLA and also ask Litbit to submit it’s CCLA. I will likely volunteer to take care of the initial admin duties until we get a flow of communication and a decision making via the

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept the iota project into the Apache Incubator

2016-02-05 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Is the code grant process you are referring to below the CCLA or is it an > additional requirement? CCLA are optional [1][2], software grants [3][4] are required. So yes that’s an additional requirement, SG give the ASF the rights to use to code that is donated. Thanks, Justin 1.