Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.1-incubating Release

+1 (binding) So far I've checked: signatures and digests, source releases file layouts, matched git tags and commit ids, incubator suffix and disclaimer, NOTICE and LICENSE files, build sources in a clean environment (openjdk8, debian 64bits). Aligned with Justin, this new release addresses my

Re: DRAFT report February 2016 -- please review

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > > > Blur > > > > Blur is a search platform capable of searching massive amounts of data > > in a cloud computing environment. > > > > Blur has been incubating since 2012-07-24. > > > > Three

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.9.0-incubating (RC3)

On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache > SystemML version 0.9.0! > > The PPMC vote thread: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg00267.html > > And the

[VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.1-incubating Release

Hello, We are happy to announce that TinkerPop 3.1.1-incubating is ready for release. The release artifacts can be found at this location: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tinkerpop/3.1.1-incubating/ The source distribution is provided by:

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

Hi, You may want to common on / watch what happens with this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-234 (Re ASF license copyright lines in NOTICE) Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.1-incubating Release

HI, Sorry forgot to mention re NOTICE files: - year should be 2016 not 2015, although most projects tend to put a year range now [1] - project name should probably be "Apache TinkerPop (incubating)” not just "Apache TinkerPop" Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Here what I worked out needs to be added to LICENSE and NOTICE for each type > of bundled license. Good stuff! Here's a old (2002) but succinct snippet on combining licenses:

Please grant me write access to the incubator wiki

Hello, Please grant my account KatheyMarsden write access to the incubator wiki. Thank you, Kathey - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.1.1-incubating Release

Hi, +1 binding For the source release I checked: - release name contains incubating - signatures and hashed good - disclaimer exists - LICENSE and NOTICE have some minor issues (see below) - all source files have apache headers - no unexpected binary files - can compile from source License and

Re: Please grant me write access to the incubator wiki

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Katherine Marsden wrote: > Please grant my account KatheyMarsden write access to the incubator wiki. Done. Marvin Humphrey - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: >>> Does the policy need to be made clearer first? >> >> Yes, I think that's important -- it will help us to persuade PMCs that our >> proposed changes are both correct and worthwhile. > > OK lets work on that. Based on

Re: Confusion over NOTICE vs LICENSE files

Hi, > There are no active products using Apache-1.1 -- though old releases are still > available -- so this question is mostly academic. May be the case for some binary releases using old software. I can think of one project that may need to check that. > But it's very interesting

Re: DRAFT report February 2016 -- please review

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Tim Williams wrote: > As the report mentions, community growth/involvement is the most > important/only issue holding Blur back from graduating. I think a key > ingredient to progress on this could be someone stepping up to give some >

License statement third party modified code

Hello, Instructions on the website regarding source headers: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html Gives instructions for “Treatment of third-party works”. Point five says: Major modifications/additions to third-party should be dealt with on a case-by-case basis by

[VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)

The vote concluded with +4 (+3 binding) +1 binding from Justin Mclean +1 from Ian Dunlop +1 binding from John D. Ament +1 binding from Jean-Baptiste Onofré On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:23 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > LICENSE is OK > NOTICE looks good