Re: 54 podlings - too many?

Hi, > We're currently at 54 podlings in the incubator. A more use stat would perhaps to see: a) How long they have been in incubation? b) How many releases have they made? May be easier to then target one that should graduate or perhaps retire? Thanks, Justin

Re: 54 podlings - too many?

I think it's a lot, but shouldn't be a worry as long as mentors are keeping up, right? And that the incubator report manager isn't overburdened. ;) There's also the topic of shepherds. I seem to recall a sentiment to the effect that incubator shepherds weren't adding value (from whom, I forget

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

Hi, > There's been a long tradition in the Incubator of "carrying over" IPMC > votes from the podling dev list. And let's consider why -- is there > really a benefit to having IPMC members cast votes twice Yes it’s then clear on the this list how many +1 votes there currently is before the

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 8:53 PM Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > From memory it was that they are not automatically transferred (but I > could > > be wrong). Otherwise podlings could skip

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > From memory it was that they are not automatically transferred (but I could > be wrong). Otherwise podlings could skip voting on the incubator list > altogether if they had 3 +1 votes on the dev list. IMO It’s not

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

Hi, > This has come up before, and I believe the last consensus was that votes on > the dev lists automatically transferred. From memory it was that they are not automatically transferred (but I could be wrong). Otherwise podlings could skip voting on the incubator list altogether if they had

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > No a big deal (as it passed), but only votes on the incubator list by the > incubator PMC are binding. Hi Justin, There's been a long tradition in the Incubator of "carrying over" IPMC votes from the

54 podlings - too many?

All, We're currently at 54 podlings in the incubator. I feel like that's a lot. Anyone else have any concerns with so many podlings? John

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 8:34 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > No a big deal (as it passed), but only votes on the incubator list by the > incubator PMC are binding. > This has come up before, and I believe the last consensus was that votes on the dev lists

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

Hi, No a big deal (as it passed), but only votes on the incubator list by the incubator PMC are binding. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating)

The vote for releasing Apache FreeMarker 2.3.24 (incubating) passed with 5 binding "+1" votes, and no "0" or "-1" votes. Binding votes: Jacopo Cappellato +1 Jean-Baptiste Onofré +1 John D. Ament +1 Justin Mclean +1 Sergio Fernández +1 (voted on d...@freemarker.incubator.apache.org only)

Re: Report Manager for April

You da man. On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:46 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > Unless someone else wants to take it on, I'm going to volunteer to take > care of the board report for April. > > John >

Report Manager for April

All, Unless someone else wants to take it on, I'm going to volunteer to take care of the board report for April. John